This paper introduces a new, active methodology to modeling and leak detection intended to mitigate the effects of data uncertainty in such challenging situations, and presents three case studies. The American Petroleum Institute (API) has coined the phrase Computational Pipeline Monitoring (CPM) to encompass several methods of leak detection. The use of real-time transient hydraulic simulation tools, driven by data gathered by a Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system, is one form of CPM system. Such real-time simulations impose SCADA-gathered data (typically pressures, flows, temperatures) onto a characterization of the pipeline (the model) and the fluids in the system. In a tuned CPM system, if the SCADA-gathered data cannot be successfully imposed on the model without transgressing the laws of fluid mechanics, this signifies a pipeline anomaly, which may be a release. However, in reality, many pipeline hydraulic anomalies are due to changing uncertainties in the data presented to the model and if annunciated to the pipeline operators would constitute a “false leak alarm.” While they typically are not large enough to compromise pipeline operations, uncertainties abound in the SCADA-gathered data. Even were the SCADA-gathered pressure and temperature data to contain no uncertainty, the fluid properties might not be sufficiently characterized for the simulation to accurately calculate how the fluid behaves under pressure and/or temperature changes. Measurement failure further complicates the task of the CPM application, as does slack line flow. Uncertainty in the CPM-driving data is not constant, it is ever-changing with variations in the pipeline flow rate, the characterization of the fluids in the line, and the quality of the individual measurement data, to mention only a few. CPM systems use a variety of methodologies to vary their sensitivity according to the uncertainty in the data used for their calculations. However, in general terms, the more uncertainty there is in the data, the lower the resulting system sensitivity becomes. Active features in a CPM leak detection system can mitigate the performance degradation due to varying data uncertainty.
Skip Nav Destination
2002 4th International Pipeline Conference
September 29–October 3, 2002
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Conference Sponsors:
- Pipeline Division
ISBN:
0-7918-3620-7
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Computational Pipeline Monitoring in Challenging Situations
James E. Short
James E. Short
Advantica Stoner, Houston, TX
Search for other works by this author on:
James E. Short
Advantica Stoner, Houston, TX
Paper No:
IPC2002-27240, pp. 1043-1048; 6 pages
Published Online:
February 24, 2009
Citation
Short, JE. "Computational Pipeline Monitoring in Challenging Situations." Proceedings of the 2002 4th International Pipeline Conference. 4th International Pipeline Conference, Parts A and B. Calgary, Alberta, Canada. September 29–October 3, 2002. pp. 1043-1048. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2002-27240
Download citation file:
3
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Elastohydrodynamic Analysis of an Elastomeric Hydraulic Rod Seal During Fully Transient Operation
J. Tribol (July,2009)
Mathematical Modeling of Pneumatic Pipes in a Simulation of Heterogeneous Engineering Systems
J. Fluids Eng (December,2011)
Thermodynamic Analysis of Thermal Responses in Horizontal Wellbores
J. Energy Resour. Technol (May,2015)
Related Chapters
System Automation
Pipeline Operation & Maintenance: A Practical Approach, Second Edition
PSA Level 2 — NPP Ringhals 2 (PSAM-0156)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Pipeline Integrity and Security
Continuing and Changing Priorities of the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes and Standards