Skip to Main Content
American Society of Mechanical Engineers: Digital Collection
Cart
header search
Search
Advanced Search
Skip Nav Destination

Proceedings Papers

Proceedings Volume Cover
2018 12th International Pipeline Conference
September 24–28, 2018
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Conference Sponsors:
  • Pipeline Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-5187-6
Volume 2: Pipeline Safety Management Systems; Project Management, Design, Construction, and Environmental Issues; Strain Based Design; Risk and Reliability; Northern Offshore and Production Pipelines

Pipeline Safety Management Systems

Competency

Management System Competency Model and Development Program
Mark S. Jean, Lynn A. Sikorski, Laura P. Zaleschuk
IPC 2018; V002T01A001https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78148
View Articletitled, Management System Competency Model and Development Program
PDF
Topics: Competencies , Design , Pipelines , Roads
Achieving and Demonstrating Pipeline Engineering Capability: The Role of Competency Standards, and Their Use for Qualifications and Registration
Chris Harvey
IPC 2018; V002T01A002https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78321
View Articletitled, Achieving and Demonstrating Pipeline Engineering Capability: The Role of Competency Standards, and Their Use for Qualifications and Registration
PDF
Topics: Pipeline engineering , Pipelines , Engineers , Blocks (Building materials) , Design , Ocean engineering , Petroleum pipelines , Competencies , Engineering disciplines , Pressure
Competency Standards for the Pipeline Industry
Michelle Unger, Phil Hopkins
IPC 2018; V002T01A003https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78477
View Articletitled, Competency Standards for the Pipeline Industry
PDF
Topics: Pipelines , Competencies , Governments , Mentoring , Performance , Regulations

Industry/Pipeline Performance

Safety Culture Assessment and Continuous Monitoring Approach
Mark S. Jean, Laura P. Zaleschuk
IPC 2018; V002T01A004https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78150
View Articletitled, Safety Culture Assessment and Continuous Monitoring Approach
PDF
Topics: Safety , Chernobyl Nuclear Accident, Chornobyl, Ukraine, 1986 , Disasters , Failure , Petroleum industry
Accelerating Industry Performance Through Collaborative Continual Improvement
Coral Lukaniuk, Chris Coupal
IPC 2018; V002T01A005https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78285
View Articletitled, Accelerating Industry Performance Through Collaborative Continual Improvement
PDF
Topics: Computer software , Emergency management , Leadership , Pipeline integrity , Pipelines , Safety , Transparency , Water
How Do We (Actually) Know Our Quality Is Improving?
Justin R. Papp, William H. Forbes, Matthew A. R. Yarmuch
IPC 2018; V002T01A006https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78407
View Articletitled, How Do We (Actually) Know Our Quality Is Improving?
PDF
Topics: Corrective actions , Data collection , Design , Performance , Pipeline construction , Pipelines , Pipes , Resolution (Optics) , Safety , Valves
Asset Integrity Management System Audits for the National Gas Company of Trinidad and Tobago
Michiel P. Brongers, Steven J. Weichel, Rafer Mohammed, Amanda Kissoon
IPC 2018; V002T01A007https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78632
View Articletitled, Asset Integrity Management System Audits for the National Gas Company of Trinidad and Tobago
PDF
Topics: Energy industry , Gas industry , Natural gas
Are Pipelines Being Held to an Unreasonably High Standard of Performance?
Alan Murray
IPC 2018; V002T01A008https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78744
View Articletitled, Are Pipelines Being Held to an Unreasonably High Standard of Performance?
PDF
Topics: Pipelines , Errors , Risk , Biomedicine , Drugs , Contamination , Crude oil , Industrial wastes , Petroleum , Statistics

Pipeline Safety/Integrity

Operational Change Assessments: A Proactive Approach to Managing Pipeline Integrity
Kelsey Fernuik, Sean Keane, Saheed Akonko, Omer Jomha, Wayne Limming
IPC 2018; V002T01A009https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78585
View Articletitled, Operational Change Assessments: A Proactive Approach to Managing Pipeline Integrity
PDF
Topics: Failure , Fitness-for-service , Flow (Dynamics) , Pipeline integrity , Pipeline integrity management , Pipelines , Pressure , Probability , Reliability , Risk
Are Integrity Management Programs Making a Difference?
Joe Paviglianiti, Alan Murray, Tijani (TJ) Elabor
IPC 2018; V002T01A010https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78597
View Articletitled, Are Integrity Management Programs Making a Difference?
PDF
Topics: Failure , Failure mechanisms , Hazards , Pipelines , Regulations , Safety , Stress corrosion cracking
Implementing API RP 1173, Pipeline Safety Management Systems: Tools and Resources to Facilitate Industry Implementation
Aaron Duke, Dave Murk, Bill Byrd, Stuart Saulters
IPC 2018; V002T01A011https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78656
View Articletitled, Implementing API RP 1173, Pipeline Safety Management Systems: Tools and Resources to Facilitate Industry Implementation
PDF
Topics: American Petroleum Institute , Pipelines , Safety

Regulatory

Is the Push for More Prescriptive Regulation Making Us Less Safe?
Charlene B. Wright, Mark S. Jean
IPC 2018; V002T01A012https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78151
View Articletitled, Is the Push for More Prescriptive Regulation Making Us Less Safe?
PDF
Topics: American Petroleum Institute , Engineering standards , Natural gas , Performance , Pipelines , Pressure , Regulations , Safety
Is Public Safety Impacted by the Multiple Regulatory Regimes for Gas Pipelines and Networks?
Jan Hayes, Lynne Chester, Dolruedee Kramnaimuang King
IPC 2018; V002T01A013https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78160
View Articletitled, Is Public Safety Impacted by the Multiple Regulatory Regimes for Gas Pipelines and Networks?
PDF
Topics: Pipelines , Safety , Risk , Failure , Accidents , Inspection , Maintenance , Performance , Pipeline systems , Regulations
Compliance Oversight of Operators’ Integrity Management Program for Pipelines: A Risk Based Evaluation Approach Incorporating Safety Culture
Bushra Waheed, Brodie Couch, Gouri Bhuyan, Hassan Iqbal, Eddie Lee
IPC 2018; V002T01A014https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78240
View Articletitled, Compliance Oversight of Operators’ Integrity Management Program for Pipelines: A Risk Based Evaluation Approach Incorporating Safety Culture
PDF
Topics: Pipelines , Risk , Safety , Arches , Cycles , Decision making , Engineering standards , Failure mechanisms , Failure mode and effects analysis , Pipeline integrity management
Using Alternate Technologies and Advancements Through Special Permits, Waivers, and Other Technology Notifications
Kenneth Y. Lee, M. “Buddy” Secor, Jr.
IPC 2018; V002T01A015https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78549
View Articletitled, Using Alternate Technologies and Advancements Through Special Permits, Waivers, and Other Technology Notifications
PDF
Topics: Hazardous substances , Pipelines , Regulations , Safety , Transportation systems

Risk-Based/Informed Decision Making

Integrity Risk-Informed Decision Making
Sherif Hassanien, Doug Langer, Mona Abdolrazaghi
IPC 2018; V002T01A016https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78149
View Articletitled, Integrity Risk-Informed Decision Making
PDF
Topics: Risk-based decision making , Safety , Decision making , Risk , Aviation , Nuclear industry , Pipeline integrity , Pipeline integrity management , Pipelines , Regulations
Formalizing Integrity Management Workflows: Towards Integrity Process Modelling
Alejandro Reyes, Otto Huisman
IPC 2018; V002T01A017https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78512
View Articletitled, Formalizing Integrity Management Workflows: Towards Integrity Process Modelling
PDF
Topics: Modeling , Workflow , Engineers , Risk assessment , Transparency , Blocks (Building materials) , Decision making , Risk management , Information technology risk , Performance

Project Management, Design, Construction, and Environmental Issues

Environmental Issues

Evolving Standards of Indigenous Peoples Engagement and Managing Project Risk
Bruce D. Vincent, Indra L. Maharaj
IPC 2018; V002T02A001https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78319
View Articletitled, Evolving Standards of Indigenous Peoples Engagement and Managing Project Risk
PDF
Topics: Engineering standards , Governments , Pipelines , Risk
Using 2D and 3D Oil Spill Trajectory and Fate Models to Assess the Risk of Accidental Crude Oil Releases Along the Enbridge Line 3 Replacement Program Pipeline
Matthew G. S. Horn, Jeremy M. Fontenault
IPC 2018; V002T02A002https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78372
View Articletitled, Using 2D and 3D Oil Spill Trajectory and Fate Models to Assess the Risk of Accidental Crude Oil Releases Along the Enbridge Line 3 Replacement Program Pipeline
PDF
Topics: Crude oil , Pipelines , Risk , Trajectories (Physics) , Modeling , Contamination , Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy , Health risk assessment , Lakes , Performance
CSA Z663: Land Use Planning in the Vicinity of Pipelines
Ed Plant, Sue Capper
IPC 2018; V002T02A003https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78808
View Articletitled, CSA Z663: Land Use Planning in the Vicinity of Pipelines
PDF
Topics: Emergency response , Engineering standards , Pipeline integrity , Pipeline systems , Pipelines , Regulations , Safety , Workshops (Work spaces)

Project Construction

Automated Creation of the Pipeline Digital Twin During Construction: Improvement to Construction Quality and Pipeline Integrity
Joseph Hlady, Matt Glanzer, Lance Fugate
IPC 2018; V002T02A004https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78146
View Articletitled, Automated Creation of the Pipeline Digital Twin During Construction: Improvement to Construction Quality and Pipeline Integrity
PDF
Topics: Construction , Pipeline integrity , Pipelines , Life cycle management , Data collection , Ditches , Engineering simulation , Geometry , Maintenance , NASA
Post-Construction ILI Execution Planning Guidelines for Pipeline Quality Verification
Brian D. Brooks, Hubert Lindner
IPC 2018; V002T02A005https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78358
View Articletitled, Post-Construction ILI Execution Planning Guidelines for Pipeline Quality Verification
PDF
Topics: Construction , Pipelines , Inspection , Pipeline construction , Delays , Performance
The Application of a Knowledge Transfer Taxonomy to Pipeline Construction Inspection Best Practices
Ritch Rappel, Julian Dorscht, Reena Sahney
IPC 2018; V002T02A006https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78523
View Articletitled, The Application of a Knowledge Transfer Taxonomy to Pipeline Construction Inspection Best Practices
PDF
Topics: Construction , Inspection , Maintenance , Pipeline construction , Pipeline systems , Pipelines , Teams
How Dry Is Dry?
C. Hartloper, K. K. Botros, V. Liu, G. Lalonde, J. Lu, Y. Saud de Puche
IPC 2018; V002T02A007https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78580
View Articletitled, How Dry Is Dry?
PDF
Topics: Air flow , Dewatering , Drying , Evaporation , Gas flow , Natural gas , Pipelines , Pipes , Pressure , Temperature
A Canadian Operator Based Framework for Pipeline Pressure Tests: Lessons Learned
Nicole-Lee M. Robertson, Bob Campbell
IPC 2018; V002T02A008https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78666
View Articletitled, A Canadian Operator Based Framework for Pipeline Pressure Tests: Lessons Learned
PDF
Topics: Pipelines , Pressure , Instrumentation , Quality control , Regulations , Roads

Project Design

Inelastic Deformation of Pipelines Induced by Temporary Ground Deformations
Nobuhisa Suzuki, Takekazu Arakawa
IPC 2018; V002T02A009https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78205
View Articletitled, Inelastic Deformation of Pipelines Induced by Temporary Ground Deformations
PDF
Topics: Deformation , Pipelines , Design methodology , Stress-strain curves , Finite element analysis
Integrity Assessment of Pipelines With Ovality
Fan Zhang, Michael Rosenfeld
IPC 2018; V002T02A010https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78281
View Articletitled, Integrity Assessment of Pipelines With Ovality
PDF
Topics: Pipelines , Pressure , Pipes , Fatigue damage , Failure , Finite element analysis , American Petroleum Institute , Cycles , Geometry , Inspection
Combining Expert Knowledge and Automation to Maximize Pipeline Route Optionality and Defensibility: A Case Study of the Aurora Pipeline
Kevin Seel, Adam Phillips
IPC 2018; V002T02A011https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78289
View Articletitled, Combining Expert Knowledge and Automation to Maximize Pipeline Route Optionality and Defensibility: A Case Study of the Aurora Pipeline
PDF
Topics: Pipelines , Teams , Construction , Tradeoffs , Uncertainty
Evaluation of Hydraulic Fracturing Models and Their Limitations to Predict No-Drill Zones for Horizontal Directional Drilling
Saeed Delara, Kendra MacKay
IPC 2018; V002T02A012https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78304
View Articletitled, Evaluation of Hydraulic Fracturing Models and Their Limitations to Predict No-Drill Zones for Horizontal Directional Drilling
PDF
Topics: Drills (Tools) , Horizontal directional drilling , Hydraulic fracturing , Drilling , Soil , Pressure , Safety , Fracture (Materials) , Fracture (Process) , Pipelines
Strengthening the Current Class Location Designation System
Diana Willson, Iain Colquhoun, Dean Carnes
IPC 2018; V002T02A013https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78672
View Articletitled, Strengthening the Current Class Location Designation System
PDF
Topics: Cities , Corrosion , Damage , Density , Design , Failure , Hazards , Pipeline systems , Pipelines , Pipes
Well-Integrated Design of Surge Relief Systems in Oil Storage Facilities
Emma Perez, Ashishkumar Mehta
IPC 2018; V002T02A014https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78682
View Articletitled, Well-Integrated Design of Surge Relief Systems in Oil Storage Facilities
PDF
Topics: Design , Relief valves , Storage , Surges , Pressure , Flow (Dynamics) , Engineering simulation , Fluids , Pipelines , Pipes
The Optimum Pipeline Burial Depth Considering Slow Downslope Soil Movement and Seasonal Temperature Variation
Mohammad Katebi, Hongwei Liu, Pooneh Maghoul, James Blatz
IPC 2018; V002T02A015https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78736
View Articletitled, The Optimum Pipeline Burial Depth Considering Slow Downslope Soil Movement and Seasonal Temperature Variation
PDF
Topics: Pipelines , Soil , Temperature , Thermal stresses , Design , Displacement , Heat transfer , Numerical analysis , Stress
What Lies Beneath: Geophysical Approaches for Assessing Trenchless Water Crossings
Alastair McClymont, Paul Bauman, Erin Ernst, Dan Parker
IPC 2018; V002T02A016https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78782
View Articletitled, What Lies Beneath: Geophysical Approaches for Assessing Trenchless Water Crossings
PDF
Topics: Water , Horizontal directional drilling , Cables , Case studies , Drilling , Engineering design , Granular materials , Seismic refraction surveying , Uncertainty

Project Management

Earned Schedule and the Use of Schedule Execution Reporting Metrics
Philip J. Beck, Dennis Kovacs
IPC 2018; V002T02A017https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78067
View Articletitled, Earned Schedule and the Use of Schedule Execution Reporting Metrics
PDF
Topics: Corrective actions , Finishes , Performance , Project management , Risk , Teams , Transparency
Utilizing Value Management to Increase Project Competitiveness
Michael Tozer, Debra Tetteh-Wayoe
IPC 2018; V002T02A018https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78230
View Articletitled, Utilizing Value Management to Increase Project Competitiveness
PDF
Topics: Design , Manufacturing industry , Teams , Transportation systems , Workshops (Work spaces)

Strain Based Design

Poster

Compression Capacity and the Seismic Integrity of Locally Deformed Line Pipes
Atsushi Suganuma, Junpei Kono, Masataka Hayashiguchi
IPC 2018; V002T06A001https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78320
View Articletitled, Compression Capacity and the Seismic Integrity of Locally Deformed Line Pipes
PDF
Topics: Compression , Pipes , Finite element analysis , Pipelines , American Petroleum Institute , Earthquakes , Deformation , Earthquake resistant design , Stress-strain curves , Work hardening

Strain Capacity and Burst Pressure

A Strain Based Criterion to Evaluate the Tensile Capacity of Transmission Pipelines Under Large Scale Cyclic Bending
Y. Andrés Plata Uribe, Claudio Ruggieri
IPC 2018; V002T06A002https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78103
View Articletitled, A Strain Based Criterion to Evaluate the Tensile Capacity of Transmission Pipelines Under Large Scale Cyclic Bending
PDF
Topics: Pipelines , Ductile fracture , Pipes , Stress , Tension , Buckling , Damage , Structural steel , Surface mount components , Carbon steel
Effect of UOE Forming Process on the Buckling Strains of Steel Pipes
Majid Tanbakuei Kashani, Magdi Mohareb, Mahyar Asadi, Mathew Smith
IPC 2018; V002T06A003https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78131
View Articletitled, Effect of UOE Forming Process on the Buckling Strains of Steel Pipes
PDF
Topics: Buckling , Pipes , Steel , Residual stresses , Deformation , Finite element analysis , Shapes , Flat plates , Pipelines , Stress
Influence of Material Heterogeneity on the Strain Capacity of Pipelines
Susanne Höhler, Andreas Mondry, Christoph Kalwa, Kaveh Samadian, Wim De Waele, Stijn Hertelé
IPC 2018; V002T06A004https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78397
View Articletitled, Influence of Material Heterogeneity on the Strain Capacity of Pipelines
PDF
Topics: Pipelines , Pipes , Deformation , Design , Collapse , Electromagnetic scattering , Materials properties , Mechanical properties , Pressure , Simulation
Girth Weld Strength Matching Effect on Tensile Strain Capacity of Grade X70 High Strain Line Pipe
Hisakazu Tajika, Takahiro Sakimoto, Tsunehisa Handa, Rinsei Ikeda, Joe Kondo
IPC 2018; V002T06A005https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78778
View Articletitled, Girth Weld Strength Matching Effect on Tensile Strain Capacity of Grade X70 High Strain Line Pipe
PDF
Topics: Pipes , Buckling , Pipelines , Deformation , Pipe bending , Rupture , Design , Electrical discharge machining , Gas metal arc welding , Gas tungsten arc welding
Assessment of Dents Under High Longitudinal Strain
Bo Wang, Yong-Yi Wang, Brent Ayton, Mark Stephens, Steve Nanney
IPC 2018; V002T06A006https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78797
View Articletitled, Assessment of Dents Under High Longitudinal Strain
PDF
Topics: Numerical analysis , Pipeline construction , Pipelines , Pipes , Pressure
Tensile and Compressive Strain Capacity in the Presence of Corrosion Anomalies
Honggang Zhou, Yong-Yi Wang, Mark Stephens, Jason Bergman, Steve Nanney
IPC 2018; V002T06A007https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78802
View Articletitled, Tensile and Compressive Strain Capacity in the Presence of Corrosion Anomalies
PDF
Topics: Corrosion , Pipelines , Pipes , Construction , Design , Dimensions , Hazardous substances , Materials properties , Safety , Transportation systems
Burst Pressure of Pipelines With Corrosion Anomalies Under High Longitudinal Strains
Honggang Zhou, Yong-Yi Wang, Mark Stephens, Jason Bergman, Steve Nanney
IPC 2018; V002T06A008https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78803
View Articletitled, Burst Pressure of Pipelines With Corrosion Anomalies Under High Longitudinal Strains
PDF
Topics: Corrosion , Pipelines , Pressure , Pipes , Numerical analysis , Failure , Hazardous substances , Performance , Pipeline integrity , Safety
Burst Pressure of Wrinkles Under High Longitudinal Strain
Honggang Zhou, Yong-Yi Wang, Steve Nanney
IPC 2018; V002T06A009https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78804
View Articletitled, Burst Pressure of Wrinkles Under High Longitudinal Strain
PDF
Topics: Pressure , Pipes , Numerical analysis , Pipelines

Strain Demand and Assessment

Using Controlled Global Buckling to Improve Buried Pipelines Performance Under Large Compressive Ground Displacements
Ali Fathi, Onyekachi Ndubuaku, Samer Adeeb
IPC 2018; V002T06A010https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78084
View Articletitled, Using Controlled Global Buckling to Improve Buried Pipelines Performance Under Large Compressive Ground Displacements
PDF
Topics: Buckling , Pipelines , Pipes , Boundary-value problems , Deformation , Design methodology , Failure , Hardening , Shapes
Assessment of Stress Based Design Pipelines Experiencing High Axial Strains
Robert Andrews, Mark Stephens, Malcolm Carr, Johannes Brückner
IPC 2018; V002T06A011https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78111
View Articletitled, Assessment of Stress Based Design Pipelines Experiencing High Axial Strains
PDF
Topics: Design , Pipelines , Stress , Pipes , Welded joints , Buckling , Compression , Flow charts , Fracture toughness , Inspection
The Effect of Ground Displacement and Stress Relief on Pipeline Behaviour: A Case Study
Hamid Karimian, Chris Campbell, Chris Blackwell, Colin Dooley, Pete Barlow
IPC 2018; V002T06A012https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78245
View Articletitled, The Effect of Ground Displacement and Stress Relief on Pipeline Behaviour: A Case Study
PDF
Topics: Displacement , Pipelines , Stress , Finite element analysis , Landslides , Deformation , Inspection , Pipes , Rivers , Soil
Methodologies for Establishing the Probability of Pipeline Failure at Slope Crossings
Millan Sen, Sherif Hassanien, Yves Cormier, Smitha Koduru
IPC 2018; V002T06A013https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78352
View Articletitled, Methodologies for Establishing the Probability of Pipeline Failure at Slope Crossings
PDF
Topics: Failure , Pipelines , Probability , Hazards , Buckling , Containment , Elongation , Failure mechanisms , Reliability , Risk
Landslide Pipe-Soil Interaction: State of the Practice
Geoffrey N. Eichhorn, Stuart K. Haigh
IPC 2018; V002T06A014https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78434
View Articletitled, Landslide Pipe-Soil Interaction: State of the Practice
PDF
Topics: Landslides , Pipes , Soil , Pipelines , Modeling , Springs , Beams (Structural) , Sands , Spacetime , Stress
Improving Fitness-for-Purpose Methodology and Safety Target Definitions on Geohazard Related Pipe Deformation
Nader Yoosef-Ghodsi, Kurt Baraniecki, Mike Hill, Yvan Hubert
IPC 2018; V002T06A015https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78710
View Articletitled, Improving Fitness-for-Purpose Methodology and Safety Target Definitions on Geohazard Related Pipe Deformation
PDF
Topics: Deformation , Pipes , Safety , Pipelines , Soil , Inspection , Uncertainty , Finite element analysis , Maintainability , Maintenance

Risk and Reliability

Assessment of the Threat From Wildfires on Above Ground Natural Gas Facilities
Clive G. Robinson, Zoë E. Wattis, Colin Dooley, Sladjana Popovic
IPC 2018; V002T07A001https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78059
View Articletitled, Assessment of the Threat From Wildfires on Above Ground Natural Gas Facilities
PDF
Topics: Cables , Compressors , Control systems , Damage , Emergency preparedness , Failure , Fire , Flames , Flow (Dynamics) , High pressure (Physics)
Corrosion Growth Modeling Based on Mass In-Line Inspection Data Using Variational Inference
Monica Birkland, Markus R. Dann
IPC 2018; V002T07A002https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78081
View Articletitled, Corrosion Growth Modeling Based on Mass In-Line Inspection Data Using Variational Inference
PDF
Topics: Corrosion , Inspection , Modeling , Pipelines , Uncertainty , Approximation , Chain , Density , Errors , Gages
Semi-Quantitative Reliability-Based Ranking Method for Assessment of Pipeline Dents With Stress Risers
Doug Langer, Sherif Hassanien, Janine Woo
IPC 2018; V002T07A003https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78156
View Articletitled, Semi-Quantitative Reliability-Based Ranking Method for Assessment of Pipeline Dents With Stress Risers
PDF
Topics: Pipeline risers , Pipelines , Reliability , Risers (Casting) , Stress , Pipeline systems , Uncertainty , Failure , Risk , Errors
Estimating Landslide Induced Probability of Failure to Pipelines Using a Structured Reductionist Approach
Richard Guthrie, Emma Reid
IPC 2018; V002T07A004https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78157
View Articletitled, Estimating Landslide Induced Probability of Failure to Pipelines Using a Structured Reductionist Approach
PDF
Topics: Failure , Landslides , Pipelines , Probability , Pipes , Statistics , Hazards , Boundary-value problems , Pipeline integrity management , Risk management
Effective Risk Management for In Service Pipelines: Achieving ALARP by Pressure Management and Slab Protection
Francis Carroll, Jan Hayes
IPC 2018; V002T07A005https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78170
View Articletitled, Effective Risk Management for In Service Pipelines: Achieving ALARP by Pressure Management and Slab Protection
PDF
Topics: Pipelines , Pressure , Risk management , Slabs , Risk , Safety , Augers , Cities , Density , Design
A Methodology to Assess the Gas Supply Capacity and Gas Supply Reliability of a Natural Gas Pipeline Network System
Weichao Yu, Kai Wen, Yichen Li, Weihe Huang, Jing Gong
IPC 2018; V002T07A006https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78173
View Articletitled, A Methodology to Assess the Gas Supply Capacity and Gas Supply Reliability of a Natural Gas Pipeline Network System
PDF
Topics: Natural gas distribution , Reliability , Flow (Dynamics) , Liquefied natural gas , Pipelines , Simulation , Uncertainty , Algorithms , Failure , Maintenance
Development and Execution of Consequence Assessment for Liquid Pipeline Facilities
C. M. Refaul Ferdous, Chris Beaudin, Anthony Payoe, Lily Li
IPC 2018; V002T07A007https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78180
View Articletitled, Development and Execution of Consequence Assessment for Liquid Pipeline Facilities
PDF
Topics: Pipelines , Risk , Risk assessment , Safety , Algorithms , Risk-based decision making , Design , Failure , Plant maintenance , Regulations
Risk Assessment for Small Diameter Piping for Liquid Pipeline Facilities
C. M. Refaul Ferdous, Amanda Kulhawy, Jessica Farrell, Chris Beaudin, Anthony Payoe, Lily Li
IPC 2018; V002T07A008https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78182
View Articletitled, Risk Assessment for Small Diameter Piping for Liquid Pipeline Facilities
PDF
Topics: Pipelines , Pipes , Risk assessment , Risk , Failure , Maintenance , Pipeline systems , Pressure sensors , Pumps , Risk-based inspection
Developing a Full Risk Picture for Gas Pipeline Consequences
Ken E. Oliphant, David A. Joyal, Vida Meidanshahi
IPC 2018; V002T07A009https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78217
View Articletitled, Developing a Full Risk Picture for Gas Pipeline Consequences
PDF
Topics: Pipelines , Risk , Density , Modeling , Pipes , Pressure , Probability
Effect of Model Error on Reliability Analysis of Surface Cracks
Mahmoud Ibrahim, Karmun Doucette, Sherif Hassanien, Doug Langer
IPC 2018; V002T07A010https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78237
View Articletitled, Effect of Model Error on Reliability Analysis of Surface Cracks
PDF
Topics: Errors , Event history analysis , Surface cracks , Failure , Reliability , Pipelines , Pipeline systems , Risk , Safety , Uncertainty
Quantitative Risk Assessment Techniques Based on Uncertainty Theory for Natural Gas Distribution Station
Jiao Zhou, Xingyu Peng, Dongchi Yao
IPC 2018; V002T07A011https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78260
View Articletitled, Quantitative Risk Assessment Techniques Based on Uncertainty Theory for Natural Gas Distribution Station
PDF
Topics: Natural gas distribution , Risk assessment , Uncertainty , Accidents , Failure , Decision making , Failure data , Fuzzy set theory , Pipeline systems , Pipelines
Development of Empirical Method to Calculate Natural Gas Pipelines Rupture Exposure Radius
Abdulaziz N. Ababtain, Arafat M. Aloqaily
IPC 2018; V002T07A012https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78272
View Articletitled, Development of Empirical Method to Calculate Natural Gas Pipelines Rupture Exposure Radius
PDF
Topics: Natural gas distribution , Rupture , Pipelines , Modeling , Valves , Computational methods , Emergencies , Safety , Wall thickness , Computer software
Use of Risk and Engineering Assessments to Improve Safety in Class Location Changes: South American Case Study
John Erick Malpartida Moya
IPC 2018; V002T07A013https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78302
View Articletitled, Use of Risk and Engineering Assessments to Improve Safety in Class Location Changes: South American Case Study
PDF
Topics: Risk , Safety , Pipelines , Design , Maintenance , Pressure , Regulations , Wall thickness , ASME Standards , Construction
A Multi-Module Systemic Approach for the Supply Reliability Analysis of Multi-Product Pipeline Under Pump Units Failure
Xingyuan Zhou, Qi Liao, Mengyun Lv, Haoran Zhang, Yongtu Liang, Chengcheng Xiang
IPC 2018; V002T07A014https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78367
View Articletitled, A Multi-Module Systemic Approach for the Supply Reliability Analysis of Multi-Product Pipeline Under Pump Units Failure
PDF
Topics: Event history analysis , Failure , Pipelines , Pumps , Reliability , Failure mode and effects analysis , Pipeline systems , China , Economics , Failure mechanisms
Updates on Pipeline Integrity Reliability Targets
Alex Nemeth, Sherif Hassanien, Len Leblanc
IPC 2018; V002T07A015https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78378
View Articletitled, Updates on Pipeline Integrity Reliability Targets
PDF
Topics: Pipeline integrity , Reliability , Failure , Pipelines , Probability , Risk , Safety , Pipeline integrity management , Risk-based decision making
The Application of Bayesian Network Threat Model for Corrosion Assessment of Pipeline in Design Stage
Guanlan Liu, Francois Ayello, Jiana Zhang, Peter Stephens
IPC 2018; V002T07A016https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78388
View Articletitled, The Application of Bayesian Network Threat Model for Corrosion Assessment of Pipeline in Design Stage
PDF
Topics: Corrosion , Design , Pipelines , Network models , Uncertainty , Chemistry , Erosion , Failure , Flow (Dynamics) , Modeling
Third-Party Damage Model for Gas Distribution Pipelines
Joseph S. Santarelli, Wenxing Zhou, Carrie Dudley-Tatsu
IPC 2018; V002T07A017https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78400
View Articletitled, Third-Party Damage Model for Gas Distribution Pipelines
PDF
Topics: Damage , Pipelines , Temperature programmed desorption , Probability , Failure , Emergency preparedness , Failure analysis , Maintenance , Natural gas , Pipeline systems
The Use of Sensitivity Analyses for Optimum Data Gathering in Risk and Threats Assessments
Francois Ayello, Hao Chen, Narasi Sridhar, Lydia Ruiz, Travis Sera, Mari Shironishi
IPC 2018; V002T07A018https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78402
View Articletitled, The Use of Sensitivity Analyses for Optimum Data Gathering in Risk and Threats Assessments
PDF
Topics: Risk , Sensitivity analysis , Risk assessment , Data collection , Pipelines , Engineers , Risk reduction
Statistical Analyses of Incidents on Onshore Hazardous Liquid Pipelines Based on PHMSA Database
Shengli Liu, Yongtu Liang, Xiao Wang, Dong Han
IPC 2018; V002T07A019https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78528
View Articletitled, Statistical Analyses of Incidents on Onshore Hazardous Liquid Pipelines Based on PHMSA Database
PDF
Topics: Databases , Pipelines , Statistical analysis , Failure , Safety , Accidents , Corrosion , Engineers , Hazardous substances , Hazards
CO2SAFE-ARREST: A Full-Scale Burst Test Research Program for Carbon Dioxide Pipelines — Part 3: Dispersion Modelling
Ajit Godbole, Xiong Liu, Guillaume Michal, Cheng Lu, Clara Huéscar Medina
IPC 2018; V002T07A020https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78530
View Articletitled, CO2SAFE-ARREST: A Full-Scale Burst Test Research Program for Carbon Dioxide Pipelines — Part 3: Dispersion Modelling
PDF
Topics: Carbon dioxide , Modeling , Pipelines , Computational fluid dynamics , Fracture (Materials) , Fracture (Process) , Engineering simulation , Explosives , Nitrogen , Pipes
Limit States Design Checks for Geotechnical Loads
Maher A. Nessim, Smitha D. Koduru
IPC 2018; V002T07A021https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78569
View Articletitled, Limit States Design Checks for Geotechnical Loads
PDF
Topics: Design , Stress , Reliability , Safety , Buckling , Creep , Deformation , Landslides , Pipelines , Risk
A Brazilian Pipeline Incident Database: The PETROBRAS and TRANSPETRO Initiative
Douglas Alves, Ana Bahiense, Michelle Bastos, Cassiano Borges, Gilson Lima
IPC 2018; V002T07A022https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78584
View Articletitled, A Brazilian Pipeline Incident Database: The PETROBRAS and TRANSPETRO Initiative
PDF
Topics: Databases , Pipelines , Safety , Failure , Transportation systems , Architecture , Construction , Cycles , Data collection , Decision making
Development of Reliability-Based Criteria for Corrosion Assessment
Riski Adianto, Maher Nessim, Dongliang Lu
IPC 2018; V002T07A023https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78605
View Articletitled, Development of Reliability-Based Criteria for Corrosion Assessment
PDF
Topics: Corrosion , Reliability , Pipelines , Safety , Failure , Leakage , Pressure , Probability , Density , Design
System Wide Risk Assessment in the 21st Century: TransCanada’s Approach
Aleksandar Tomic, Terry Huang, Shahani Kariyawasam
IPC 2018; V002T07A024https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78657
View Articletitled, System Wide Risk Assessment in the 21<sup>st</sup> Century: TransCanada’s Approach
PDF
Topics: Risk assessment , Risk , Failure , Cycles , Decision making , Failure analysis , Inspection , Maintenance , Pipelines , Regulations
Geohazard Management Approach Within Safety Case
Dario Zapata, Ingrid Pederson, Sean Keane
IPC 2018; V002T07A025https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78678
View Articletitled, Geohazard Management Approach Within Safety Case
PDF
Topics: Safety , Maintenance , Pipeline systems , Risk , Hazards , Pipeline integrity management , Pipelines
A Robust Risk Assessment Model for Stress Corrosion Cracking
Mohammad Al-Amin, Shahani Kariyawasam, Elvis SanJuan Riverol
IPC 2018; V002T07A026https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78694
View Articletitled, A Robust Risk Assessment Model for Stress Corrosion Cracking
PDF
Topics: Risk assessment , Stress corrosion cracking , Stress , Coating processes , Coatings , Pipes , Soil , Compressors , Drainage , Failure
Pipeline Dent Fatigue Crack Leak Rate for Liquids Pipelines and the Application to Release Consequence Assessment
Sanjay Tiku, Mark Piazza, Vlado Semiga, Binoy John, Aaron Dinovitzer
IPC 2018; V002T07A027https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78716
View Articletitled, Pipeline Dent Fatigue Crack Leak Rate for Liquids Pipelines and the Application to Release Consequence Assessment
PDF
Topics: Fatigue cracks , Leakage , Pipelines , Fracture (Materials) , Pressure , Pipes , Cracking (Materials) , Emergency response , Failure , Failure mechanisms
Application of In-Line Inspection and Failure Data to Reduce Subjectivity of Risk Model Scores for Uninspected Pipelines
Yannick Beauregard, Aaron Woo, Terry Huang
IPC 2018; V002T07A028https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78735
View Articletitled, Application of In-Line Inspection and Failure Data to Reduce Subjectivity of Risk Model Scores for Uninspected Pipelines
PDF
Topics: Failure data , Inspection , Pipelines , Risk , Coating processes , Coatings , Corrosion , Soil
An Update to the Recommended UKOPA External Interference Frequency Prediction Model and Pipeline Damage Distributions
Graham Goodfellow, Chris Lyons, Susannah Turner, Fraser Gray, Simon Joyce
IPC 2018; V002T07A029https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78767
View Articletitled, An Update to the Recommended UKOPA External Interference Frequency Prediction Model and Pipeline Damage Distributions
PDF
Topics: Damage , Pipelines , Failure , Databases , Chisels , Accidents , Carbon dioxide , Dimensions , Hazards , Reliability
Guidelines for Quantitative Risk Model Development
Smitha D. Koduru, Jason B. Skow
IPC 2018; V002T07A030https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78783
View Articletitled, Guidelines for Quantitative Risk Model Development
PDF
Topics: Model development , Risk , Pipelines , Failure , Hazardous substances , Natural gas , Risk analysis , Risk assessment , Safety , Transportation systems
Development of Strain Demand and Capacity Distributions to Use in Limit States Design for Geotechnical Loads
Smitha D. Koduru, Maher A. Nessim
IPC 2018; V002T07A031https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78784
View Articletitled, Development of Strain Demand and Capacity Distributions to Use in Limit States Design for Geotechnical Loads
PDF
Topics: Design , Stress , Creep , Pipelines , Soil , Landslides , Modeling , Movements (Mechanisms) , Pipes , Reliability

Northern Offshore and Production Pipelines

Northern and Production Pipelines

Optimization of Hydrate Management in Deepwater Gas Well Testing Operations
Shangfei Song, Bohui Shi, Weichao Yu, Wang Li, Jing Gong
IPC 2018; V002T08A001https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78269
View Articletitled, Optimization of Hydrate Management in Deepwater Gas Well Testing Operations
PDF
Topics: Natural gas wells , Optimization , Testing , Flow (Dynamics) , High pressure (Physics) , Low temperature , Petroleum industry , Pipelines , Risk , Seas
Comparative Study on Atmospheric Temperature Models for the Buried Hot Oil Pipeline
Qing Yuan, Zhiming Wu, Wang Li, Bo Yu, Changchun Wu
IPC 2018; V002T08A002https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78451
View Articletitled, Comparative Study on Atmospheric Temperature Models for the Buried Hot Oil Pipeline
PDF
Topics: Pipelines , Temperature , Approximation , Computer simulation , Transportation systems , Crude oil , Soil
A Simplified Simulation Model for Buried Hot Oil Pipeline Temperature Field During Shutdown
Lei Chen, Junjie Gao, Gang Liu, Cheng Chen
IPC 2018; V002T08A003https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78812
View Articletitled, A Simplified Simulation Model for Buried Hot Oil Pipeline Temperature Field During Shutdown
PDF
Topics: Pipelines , Simulation models , Temperature , Crude oil , Boundary-value problems , Heat transfer , Soil , Convection , Cooling , Finite volume methods

Offshore Pipelines and Risers

Case Studies Highlighting Rapid Repair Methods of Pressurised Pipelines Damaged by Anchors
Dale Millward
IPC 2018; V002T08A004https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78105
View Articletitled, Case Studies Highlighting Rapid Repair Methods of Pressurised Pipelines Damaged by Anchors
PDF
Topics: Maintenance , Pipelines , Underwater pipelines , Damage , Hazards , Pipeline systems , Vessels , Buoyancy , Containment , Downtime
Advanced SAWL Developments and Optimizations for High Toughness, Low Hardness and Sour Environment
Fernando F. Silva, Fabio Arroyo, Philippe Darcis, Marcelo Fritz, Marcelo Salani, Adriano Silva
IPC 2018; V002T08A005https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78108
View Articletitled, Advanced SAWL Developments and Optimizations for High Toughness, Low Hardness and Sour Environment
PDF
Topics: Fracture toughness , Welding , Hydrogen , Metals , Pipes , Alloys , Ferrites (Magnetic materials) , Hydrogen embrittlement , Mechanical properties , Stress
Program to Evaluate Readiness Levels of Pipeline-Oriented Technologies
Chris Alexander, Satish Kulkarni
IPC 2018; V002T08A006https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78238
View Articletitled, Program to Evaluate Readiness Levels of Pipeline-Oriented Technologies
PDF
Topics: Pipelines , Risk , High pressure (Physics) , Inspection , Aerospace industry , Composite materials , Defense industry , Imaging , Optical fiber
All Years

ASME Journals

ASME Conference Proceedings

ASME eBooks

Resources

Opportunities

  • Crossref Logo
  • Crossref Open Funder Registry Logo
  • Crossref Open Cited-By Logo
  • Crossref Crossmark Logo
  • Crossref Similarity Check Logo
  • Chorus Logo
  • Counter Logo
  • Cope Logo
  • STM Logo
Copyright © 2024 The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy.
Accept