Stainless steel is the most widely used alloys of steel. The reputed variety of stainless steel having customised material properties as per the design requirements is Duplex Stainless Steel and Austenitic Stainless Steel. The Austenite Stainless Steel alloy has been developed further to be Super Austenitic Stainless Steel (SASS) by increasing the percentage of the alloying elements to form the half or more than the half of the material composition. SASS (Grade-AL-6XN) is an alloy steel containing high percentages of nickel (24%), molybdenum (6%) and chromium (21%). The chemical elements offer high degrees of corrosion resistance, toughness and stability in a large range of hostile environments like petroleum, marine and food processing industries. SASS is often used as a commercially viable substitute to high cost non-ferrous or non-metallic metals. The ability to machine steel effectively and efficiently is of utmost importance in the current competitive market. This paper is an attempt to evaluate the machinability of SASS which has been a classified material so far with very limited research conducted on it. Understanding the machinability of this alloy would assist in the effective forming of this material by metal cutting. The novelty of research associated with this is paper is reasonable taking into consideration the unknowns involved in machining SASS. The experimental design consists of conducting eight milling trials at combination of two different feed rates, 0.1 and 0.15 mm/tooth; cutting speeds, 100 and 150 m/min; Depth of Cut (DoC), 2 and 3 mm and coolant on for all the trials. The cutting tool has two inserts and therefore has two cutting edges. The trial sample is mounted on a dynamometer (type 9257B) to measure the cutting forces during the trials. The cutting force data obtained is later analyzed using DynaWare supplied by Kistler. The machined sample is subjected to surface roughness (Ra) measurement using a 3D optical surface profilometer (Alicona Infinite Focus). A comprehensive metallography process consisting of mounting, polishing and etching was conducted on a before and after machined sample in order to make a comparative analysis of the microstructural changes due to machining. The microstructural images were capture using a digital microscope. The microhardness test were conducted on a Vickers scale (Hv) using a Vickers microhardness tester. Initial bulk hardness testing conducted on the material show that the alloy is having a hardness of 83.4 HRb. This study expects an increase in hardness mostly due to work hardening may be due to phase transformation. The results obtained from the cutting trials are analyzed in order to judge the machinability of the material. Some of the criteria used for machinability evaluation are cutting force analysis, surface texture analysis, metallographic analysis and microhardness analysis. The methodology followed in each aspect of the investigation is similar to and inspired by similar research conducted on other materials. However, the novelty of this research is the investigation of various aspects of machinability and drawing comparisons between each other while attempting to justify each result obtained to the microstructural changes observed which influence the behaviour of the alloy. Due to the limited scope of the paper, machinability criteria such as chip morphology, Metal Removal Rate (MRR) and tool wear are not included in this paper. All aspects are then compared and the optimum machining parameters are justified with a scope for future investigations.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2015 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition
November 13–19, 2015
Houston, Texas, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- ASME
ISBN:
978-0-7918-5735-9
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
A Preliminary Study on Machinability of Super Austenitic Stainless Steel
Ashwin Polishetty,
Ashwin Polishetty
Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Mohanad Fakhri Abdulqader Alabdullah,
Mohanad Fakhri Abdulqader Alabdullah
Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Nihal Pillay,
Nihal Pillay
Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Guy Littlefair
Guy Littlefair
Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Ashwin Polishetty
Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Australia
Mohanad Fakhri Abdulqader Alabdullah
Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Australia
Nihal Pillay
Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Australia
Guy Littlefair
Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Australia
Paper No:
IMECE2015-50224, V02AT02A037; 8 pages
Published Online:
March 7, 2016
Citation
Polishetty, A, Alabdullah, MFA, Pillay, N, & Littlefair, G. "A Preliminary Study on Machinability of Super Austenitic Stainless Steel." Proceedings of the ASME 2015 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. Volume 2A: Advanced Manufacturing. Houston, Texas, USA. November 13–19, 2015. V02AT02A037. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2015-50224
Download citation file:
31
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Directionally Independent Failure Prediction of End-Milling Tools During Pocketing Maneuvers
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (August,2007)
Abrasive Wear in Machining: Experiments With Materials of Controlled Microstructure
J. Eng. Mater. Technol (April,1981)
A Geometrical Simulation System of Ball End Finish Milling Process and Its Application for the Prediction of Surface Micro Features
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (February,2006)
Related Chapters
Effectiveness of Minimum Quantity Lubrication (MQL) for Different Work Materials When Turning by Uncoated Carbide (SNMM and SNMG) Inserts
Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Technologies (MIMT 2010)
Cutting Performance and Wear Mechanism of Cutting Tool in Milling of High Strength Steel 34CrNiMo6
Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Technologies (MIMT 2010)
Investigation of Some Problems In Developing Standards for Precracked Charpy Slow Bend Tests
Developments in Fracture Mechanics Test Methods Standardization