An extensive 3-D conjugate numerical study is conducted to assess the thermal performance of the novel 54 lead SOIC (with inverted exposed Cu pad) packages for automotive applications. The thermal performance of the modified designs with exposed pad are investigated, ranging from smaller die/flag size to larger ones, with single or multiple heat sources operating under various powering conditions. The thermal performance is compared to other existing packages with typical application to the automotive industry. The impact of the lead frame geometrical structure and die attach material on the overall thermal behavior is evaluated. Under one steady state (4W) operating scenario, the package reaches a peak temperature of 117.1°C, corresponding to a junction-to-heatsink thermal resistance Rjhs of 4.27°C/W. For the design with a slightly smaller Cu alloy exposed pad (Cu Alloy), the peak temperature reached by the FETs is 117.8°C, slightly higher than for the design with the intermediate size flag. In this case, the junction-to-heatsink thermal resistance Rj-hs is 4.45°C/W. The worst case powering scenario is identified, with 1.312W/FET and total power of 10.5W, barely satisfying the overall thermal budget. The variation of the peak (junction) temperature is also evaluated for several powering scenarios. Finally, a comparison with a different exposed pad package is made. The impact of the higher thermal conductivity (solder) die attach is evaluated and compared to the epoxy die attach in the 54 lead SOIC package. Several cases are evaluated in the paper, with an emphasis on the superior thermal performance of new packages for automotive applications.

1.
“Overall Roadmpap Technology Characteristics”, International technology roadmap for semiconductors update, http://public.itrs.net/
2.
Chiriac, Victor A., and Lee, Tien-Yu Tom, - “Thermal Assessment of a Power Amplifier Module in Wireless Handsets”, Proceedings of ASME IMECE Congress, New Orleans, LA, November 17-22, 2002.
3.
Khatir, Z., and Lefevre, S., 2001, “Thermal Analysis of Power Cycling Effects,” Proceedings, 17-th IEEE SEMITHERM Symposium, San Jose, CA, pp. 27–34.
4.
Zuo
Z. J.
,
North
M. T.
, and
Wert
K. L.
, “
High Heat Flux Heat Pipe
”,
Proceedings of 35th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, Las Vegas, NV
, Vol.
2
, pp.
122
128
.
5.
Chiriac
Victor A.
, and
Ortega
Alfonso
- “
A Numerical Study of the Unsteady Flow and Heat Transfer in a Transitional Confined Slot Jet Impinging on an Isothermal Surface
”,
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Pergamon Press
, Vol.
45
, pp.
1237
1248
,
2002
.
6.
Phelan
Patrick
,
Chiriac
Victor
, and
Lee
Tom
. - “
Current and Future Miniature Refrigeration Cooling Technologies for High Power Microelectronic
”,
IEEE Transactions of Components and Packaging Technologies
, Vol.
25
, No.
3
, pp.
356
365
, September
2002
.
7.
Chiriac, Victor A., Rosales, Jorge L., and Lee, Tien-Yu Tom - “Microelectronic Cooling Techniques Using Single and Dual Oscillatory Impinging Air Jets”, Proceedings of ASME IMECE Congress, New Orleans, LA, November 17-22, 2002.
8.
Lee
Tien-Yu
,
Tom
Chambers, B.
, and
Ramakrishna
K.
, “
Thermal Management of Handheld Telecommunication Products
,”
Electronics Cooling Magazine
,
4
, No.
2
, pp.
30
33
, May
1997
.
9.
Chiriac, Victor A., Lee, Tom and Hause, Vern. - “Thermal Performance Optimization of RF Packages for Wireless Communication”, Proceedings of ASME IMECE Congress, Washington D. C., November 15-121, 2003.
10.
Galloway, J. E., “Thermal Analysis Strategy for Portable Electronic Devices,” Motorola Internal Report, 1997.
11.
Mudawar, I., “Keynote Address on Thermal Management”, ITHERM 2000, International Conference on Thermal Mechanics and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems, Las Vegas, Nevada, pp. 1–20.
12.
FLOTHERM® Version 5.1, Flomerics Ltd., Surrey England, 2004.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.