In this paper, verification and validation analysis for a nonpremixed methane/air laminar flame is presented. Numerical results were obtained using the finite volume method on structured grids. The verification of the numerical solutions was performed by using the Grid Convergence Index (GCI) and Richardson extrapolation techniques. A set of three different grids is used to calculate the error due to discretization where each grid was generated by doubling the number of cells in each direction of the coarser grid. The local value of GCI was used to calculate the observed order of convergence of the numerical method for local values of temperature and mass fractions of reaction products at various points along the flow domain. The largest error band at the finest grid solution was observed to be 4.6% for the static temperature, 0.5% for the mass fraction of methane and 2.9% for the mass fraction of water vapor. Finally the numerical results were validated with experimental data using the local measurements of temperature and species mass fractions. The results indicate that there is relatively good agreement between the present results and experimental data although a simple one-step reaction model was used for the methane/air combustion. The average deviation was found to be around 25%, 21% and 10% for temperature, methane mass fraction and water vapor mass fraction respectively.

1.
Roy
C. J.
,
Oberkarapf
W. L.
, and
McWherter-Payne
M. A.
,
2003
, “
Verification and Validation for Laminar Hypersonic Flowfields, Part 2: Validation
,”
AIAA Journal
,
41
(
10)
pp.
1944
1954
.
2.
Roache, P. J., 1998, “Verification and Validation in Computational Science and Engineering,” Hermosa Publishers, Albuquerque, NM,
3.
Oberkampf, W. L., Sindir, M. M., and Conlisk, A. T., 1998, “Guide for the Verification and Validation of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations,” AIAA, G-077–1998, Reston, VA.
4.
Flynn
M. R.
, and
Eisner
A. D.
,
2004
, “
Verification and Validation Studies of the Time-Averaged Velocity Field in the very Near-Wake of a Finite Elliptical Cylinder
,”
Fluid Dynamics Research
,
34
(
4)
pp.
273
288
.
5.
Wilson
R. V.
,
Stern
F.
, and
Coleman
H. W.
,
2001
, “
Comprehensive Approach to Verification and Validation of CFD Simulations - Part 2: Application for RANS Simulation of a Cargo/Container Ship
,”
Journal of Fluids Engineering-Transactions of the Asme
,
123
(
4)
pp.
803
810
.
6.
Simonsen
C. D.
, and
Stern
F.
,
2003
, “
Verification and Validation of RANS Maneuvering Simulation of Esso Osaka: Effects of Drift and Rudder Angle on Forces and Moments
,”
Computers and Fluids
,
32
(
10)
pp.
1325
1356
.
7.
Claramunt
K.
,
Consul
R.
, and
Perez-Segarra
C. D.
,
2004
, “
Multidimensional Mathematical Modeling and Numerical Investigation of Co-Flow Partially Premixed methane/air Laminar Flames
,”
Combustion and Flame
,
137
(
4)
pp.
444
457
.
8.
Peters, N., 1988, “Laminar Flamelet Concepts in Turbulent Combustion,” Symposium (International) on Combustion, 21 St, Munich, Federal Republic of Germany, pp. 1231–1250.
9.
Bennett
B. A. V.
,
McEnally
C. S.
, and
Pfefferle
L. D.
,
2000
, “
Computational and Experimental Study of Axisymmetric Coflow Partially Premixed methane/air Flames
,”
Combustion and Flame
,
123
(
4)
pp.
522
546
.
10.
McEnally
C. S.
, and
Pfefferle
L. D.
,
1999
, “
Experimental Study of Nonfuel Hydrocarbon Concentrations in Coflowing Partially Premixed methane/air Flames
,”
Combustion and Flame
,
118
(
4)
pp.
619
632
.
11.
Roy
C. J.
,
2005
, “
Review of Code and Solution Verification Procedures for Computational Simulation
,”
Journal of Computational Physics
,
205
(
1)
pp.
131
156
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.