The challenges in designing high performance combustion systems have not changed significantly over the years, but the approach has shifted towards a more sophisticated analysis process. A technical discussion on combustion technology status and needs will show that the classic impediments that have hampered progress towards near stoichiometric combustion still exist. Temperature rise, mixing, liner cooling, stability, fuel effects, temperature profile control and emissions continue to confront the aerodynamic and mechanical designers with a plethora of engineering dilemmas and trade-offs. The process of combustion chamber design has taken a new meaning over the past several years as three dimensional codes and other advanced design and validation tools have finally changed the approach from a "cut and burn" technique to a much more analytical process. All of these new aspects are now integral elements of the new equation for advanced combustor design that must be fully understood and utilized. Only then will the operable, high temperature capable or low emission combustor systems needed for future military and civil aircraft as well as for stationary gas turbines can be developed. The present paper is an attempt to analyze the flow patterns within the combustion chamber of a 20 kW gas turbine engine using a CFD code CFX. It summarize the CFD simulation of the complete combustion chamber including primary zone, intermediate zone and dilution zone and finally attempts to achieve temperature distribution in the entire combustion chamber. These CFD results are then compared with experimental readings which not only validates analytical results but leads towards improved design.

1.
O. Mahias, F. Bastin, F. Ravet and C. Francois, “Lean premixed combustor emissions performance modeling using 3D CFD codes”, AIAA Paper2000–3199, 2000
2.
Mehra
Amit
,
Zhang
Xin
,
Ayon
Arthuro A.
,
Waitz
Ian A.
,
Schmidt
Martin A.
and
Spadaccinni
Christopher M.
, “
A Six Wafer Combustion System for a Silicon Micro Gas Turbine Engine
”,
Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems
, Vol.
9
, No.
4
, pg.
517
527
, December
2000
.
3.
Grant Swenson, “Numerical Simulations of Combustion Instabilities in Gas Turbine Combustors with Applications”, Ph. D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology, 1999.
4.
M. Coussirat, J. van Beeck, M. Mesters, E. Egusguiza, Buchlin and X. Escaler, “Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of Impinging Gas-Jet Systems: Assessment of Eddy Viscosity Models”, ASME Journal of Fluid Energy, vol. 127, 2005.
5.
L. Eca and M. Hoekstra, “On the Grid Sensitivity of the Wall Boundary Condition of the k-w Turbulence Model”, ASME Journal of Fluid Energy, vol. 126, 2004.
6.
N. Hughes & J. F. Carrotte, “Unsteadiness of the Port Feed and Jet Flows within Gas Turbine Combustion Chamber”, ASME Journal of Fluid Energy, vol. 126, 2004.
7.
W. Meier, U. Meier, M. Aigner and B. Lehmann, “Instabilities in a Gas Turbine Model Combustor”, ASME Journal of Fluid Energy, vol. 127, 2005.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.