This paper describes the design and implementation of a senior level course in mechatronic system integration for students completing a mechatronics engineering option in mechanical engineering. The course is designed to give students theoretical and practical experience with a large-scale mechatronic system, and a variety of control, sensing and actuating architectures. The lecture component of the course introduces students to large-scale project integration and interface design, as well as system architecture design. Students learn about alternative control hardware platforms commonly used in industry, such as motion control hardware, field programmable gate arrays and programmable logic controllers. The selection and system integration of various industrial sensors, including vision, are presented. Students also learn about networked control and discrete event control approaches for large-scale industrial systems. The course contains a significant practical laboratory component. In a series of laboratory sessions, students develop and implement subsystems of a part sorting machine, culminating in the integration and demonstration of an automated, autonomous, sensor driven electro-mechanical system for sorting randomly delivered parts. The course offers students a theoretical background as well as significant practical experience with large scale mechatronics systems, as would be encountered in industry. This paper describes the lecture and laboratory content, and the experiences from the first offering of the course.

1.
S. Centikunt, Mechatronics: John Wiley and Sons, 2007.
2.
Acar
M.
, “
Mechatronics Challenge for the Higher Education World
,”
IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology — Part C
, vol.
20
, no.
1
, pp.
14
20
,
1997
.
3.
Grimheden
M.
and
Hanson
M.
, “
Mechatronics — the evolution of an academic discipline in engineering education
,”
Mechatronics
, vol.
15
, pp.
179
192
,
2005
.
4.
Altintas
Y.
and
Croft
E. A.
, “
Electro-mechanical design engineering: a progress report and future directions for mechatronics education
,”
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education
, vol.
30
, no.
4
, pp.
325
339
,
2002
.
5.
Alciatore
D. G.
and
Histand
M. B.
, “
Mechatronics at Colorado State University
,”
Mechatronics
vol.
5
, no.
7
, pp.
799
810
,
1995
.
6.
Carryer
J. E.
, “
The Design of Laboratory Experiments and Projects for Mechatronics Courses
,”
Mechatronics
, vol.
5
, no.
7
, pp.
787
797
,
1995
.
7.
J. E. Carryer, “Undergraduate Mechatronics at Stanford University,” in IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, pp. 585–591, 1999.
8.
Durfee
W. K.
, “
Designing smart machines: teaching mechatronics to mechanical engineers through a project-based, creative design course
,”
Mechatronics
, vol.
5
, no.
7
, pp.
775
785
,
1995
.
9.
J. F. Gardner, J. S. Lamancusa, and H. J. Sommer, “Mechatronics II: Advanced Mechatronics for Mechanical Engineering Students,” in IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, pp. 472–476, 1999.
10.
Hargrove
J. B.
, “
Curriculum, equipment and student project outcomes for mechatronics education in the core mechanical engineering program at Kettering University
,”
Mechatronics
, vol.
12
, pp.
343
356
,
2002
.
11.
Ranaweera
A.
,
Bamieh
B.
, and
Parmenter
V.
, “
Sensors, actuators and computer interfacing laboratory course at the University of California at Santa Barbara
,”
Mechatronics
, vol.
15
, pp.
639
650
,
2005
.
12.
Brown
N. J.
and
Brown
O. T.
, “
Mechatronics “a graduate perspective
”,”
Mechatronics
, vol.
12
, pp.
159
167
,
2002
.
13.
M. A. Minor and S. Meek, “Integrated and structured project environment in mechatronics education,” in ASEE Anual Conference and Exposition, pp. 11819–11834, 2002.
14.
Hannaford
B.
and
Kuhn
K.
, “
A “hands-on” course in consumer electronics design
,”
Mechatronics
, vol.
5
, no.
7
, pp.
753
762
,
1995
.
15.
Giurgiutiu
V.
,
Lyons
J.
,
Rocheleau
D.
, and
Liu
W.
, “
Mechatronics/mictrocontroller education for mechanical engineering students at the University of South Carolina
,”
Mechatronics
, vol.
15
, pp.
1025
1036
,
2005
.
16.
D. Kulic´, Online: www.mech.ubc.ca/~mech421
17.
Lian
F. L.
,
Moyne
J. R.
, and
Tilbury
D. M.
, “
Performance Evaluation of Control Networks: Ethernet, ControlNet and DeviceNet
,”
IEEE Control Systems Magazine
, vol.
21
, no.
1
, pp.
66
83
,
2001
.
18.
Murata
T.
, “
Petri Nets: Properties, Analysis and Applications
,”
Proceedings of the IEEE
, vol.
77
, no.
4
, pp.
541
580
,
1989
.
19.
Peterson
J. L.
, “
Petri Nets
,”
Computing Surveys of the ACM
, vol.
9
, no.
3
, pp.
223
252
,
1977
.
20.
Ramadge
P. J. G.
and
Wonham
W. M.
, “
The Control of Discrete Event Systems
,”
Proceedings of the IEEE
, vol.
77
, no.
1
, pp.
81
98
,
1989
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.