Many engineering educators have become sensitive to the improved outcome of student learning in their classes. This has been true for our colleagues in the colleges of education where teachers are prepared for the teaching pedagogy. In many cultures as well as ours, the teaching profession is upheld as a noble profession. At the same time, the university faculty are held with high esteem by the general population. Faculty teaching in undergraduate programs have begun to address the pedagogy of learning in recent years. There is a national trend towards helping in this phenomenon. Besides funding initiatives by organizations such as the National, Science Foundation, engineering professional societies continue to organize forums and awards to recognize and promote teaching and learning of engineering subject matter. This paper would address an experiment in improved learning by students of a subject matter that is laboratory based. The instrumentation course is a required course for engineering technology (ET) students pursuing mechanical, manufacturing/industrial, product design, and electromechanical majors at Wayne State University (WSU). Most engineering technology students are more comfortable with experimental techniques than with derivation of equations and formulas. Setting for this course was a multi-media distance learning classroom and a set of lab experiments. The teacher had an important task of not just covering the material, but to increase student interest to optimize their learning. Although all the teaching materials were prepared for presentation in power point, after discussion with the class it was decided to make the learning process different from the traditional teaching. The class was divided in three groups and each group was given a reading assignment covering one third of the material to be covered in each session. Each team met on a regular basis going over its assignment and breaking up the tasks for each team member to lead presentation and discussion for the whole class. Learning objectives addressed in the course included team work, effective communication, system design and testing, continued student participation, effective learning for long term retention besides the contents of the subject matter. Overall, student really felt they were learning a lot and new things. This paper summarizes a very positive experience of students and faculty dealing with learning pedagogy.

1.
Hirsch, Jr., E.D., “Building Knowledge: The Case for Bringing Contents into the Language Arts Block and for a Knowledge-Rich Curriculum Core for all Children,” American Educator, Spring 2006.
2.
Rathod, M.S., “Ergonomics of Learning in a Very Descriptive Applied Human Factors Course,” ASME Paper # IMECE2005-79719, Orlando, FL, November 2005.
3.
Willingham, D.T., “How Knowledge Helps: It Speeds and Strengthens Reading Comprehension, Learning - and Thinking,” American Educator, Spring 2006.
4.
Rathod, M.S., Gipson, J.H., Newman, E., “The SMARTE Enrichment Component: A Prototype to Bring Technical Courses to Middle Schools,” ASEE Annual Conference, June 2000.
5.
Rathod, M.S., Gipson, J.H., “The SMARTE Enrichment Projects: Summer Academy for Middle School Teachers,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, June 1999.
6.
Rathod, M.S., Ferman, C.M., Golshan, R., Eubanks, C., “1st SMARTE Summer Academy for Middle School Teachers and Counselors,” NSF ATE PI Conference, Washington, DC, November 19–21, 1999.
7.
Rathod, M.S., Gipson, J.H., “The SMARTE Enrichment Programs: Perceptions of Middle School Students about Science and Technology,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, June 1998.
8.
Yaprak, E., Yaprak, A., Rathod, M.S., “Institutional Adaptation of the GC Capstone Design Course,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, June 2002.
9.
Chickamenahalli, S., Rathod, M.S., Moore, P.L., “Load Flow Studies of A Power System Using Educational Power System Simulation Program,” Proceedings of 60th American Power Conference, Chicago, IL, April 14–18, 1998.
10.
Rathod, M.S., Ferman, C.M., Golshan, R., Eubanks, C.B., “SMARTE Enrichment Activities for 8th Grade Students,” NSF ATE Conference, Washington, DC, November 21–23, 1997.
11.
Rathod, M.S., Gipson, J.H., “The SMARTE Enrichment Projects: Laboratory Based Learning for 8th Grade Students,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, June 1997.
12.
Pabbati, P.V., Rathod, M.S., “A Study of Curriculum Models That Integrate Mathematics, Physical Sciences, Computers, and Communication in Technical Courses,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, June 1995.
13.
Latorre, R., Hatamura, Y., Ohashi, H., “A New Mechanical Engineering Curriculum at the University of Tokyo,” Journal of Engineering Education, ASEE, pp 124–129, April 1994.
14.
Litwhiler, C.D.W., Kiemele, M.J., “TQM and DOE in an Undergraduate Curriculum: Success Stories,” Journal of Engineering Education, ASEE, pp 147–151, April 1994.
15.
Waks, S., “A Methodology for Determining Engineering Curriculum Contents,” Journal of Engineering Education, ASEE, pp219–229, July 1994.
16.
Bordogna, J., “Engineering Education: Innovation Through Integration,” Journal of Engineering Education, ASEE, pp 3–8, January 1993.
17.
Cherrington, B.E., “An Integrated Approach to Graduate Education in Manufacturing Systems- The U.T. Dallas Model,” Journal of Engineering Education, ASEE, pp 43–47, January 1993.
18.
Project Impact: Disseminating Innovation in Under Graduate Education, Abstracts of Projects, National Science Foundation, 1994.
19.
Biendenbach
J. M.
,
Morrison
R. E.
,
Tilmans
A. L.
, “
The Evolution of Engineering Technology in the Field of Engineering Education
,”
ASEE
, v
1
,
1990
1990
.
20.
Bies, J.D., “Mathematics for Mechanical Technicians and Technologists,” Macmillan, 1986.
21.
Shuman, L.J., Besterfuekd-Sacre, M., McGourtly, J., “The ABET “Professional Skills” - Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed? ASEE Journal of Engineering Education, v 94, n 1, January 2005.
22.
Felder, R.M., Brent, R., “Understanding Student Differences,” ASEE Journal of Engineering Education, v 94, n 1, January 2005.
23.
Smith, K.A., et al, “Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices,” ASEE Journal of Engineering Education, v 94, n 1, January 2005.
24.
Bourne, J., Harris, D., Mayadas, F., “Online Engineering Education: Learning Anywhere, Anytime,” ASEE Journal of Engineering Education, v 94, n 1, January 2005.
25.
Beckwith, T.G., Marangoni, R.D., Lienhard, V, J.H., “Mechanical Measurements,” Addison-Wesley, 5th Edition, 1995.
26.
“Active/Cooperative Learning: Best Practices in Engineering Education,” A Dissemination Project of the Foundation Coalition, Summer 2002.
27.
Yeh, C.-P., Rathod, M.S., “Enhance Electric Machines and Power Course,” ASEE Annual Conference, June 2001.
28.
“IT02 - An Introduction to Transducers and Instrumentation: Student Manual,” L.J. Electronics, Haupauge, NY.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.