A combination of computational and experimental analyses with the conventional lectures and problem-solving in a fundamental course such as fluid mechanics can enhance students' learning enormously. This teaching model has been examined within the mechanical engineering curriculum at WSU Vancouver, and successful results have been obtained thus far. The goal in this course was first to seed concepts and theorems of fluid mechanics in general terms, followed by numerical solutions and hands-on experimentation on selective subjects. This would allow the students to gain a deep understanding of the contents within the course timeframe. For selective fluid problems with more complications, such as the flow in the entrance region of a pipe, a computational fluid dynamic (CFD) software known as FlowLab was used to obtain numerical solutions. The assigned computational projects could open the eyes of students to the world of CFD analysis in thermal/fluid systems design. The results of the numerical analysis were then compared to the theoretical and experimental results. For experimentation, the students were divided into groups to design experimental procedures, conduct experiments, collect and interpret data, and report the results in an appropriate format. The selective experiments were relevant to the course topics including Burdon pressure gauges, manometers, flow-rate measurements, pipe flow, and flow around immersed bodies in a water tunnel. The present study addresses the details, results, and advantages of such a multi-dimensional and more interactive learning model.

Hailey, Ch. E. and Spall, R. E., 2000, “An introduction of CFD into the undergraduate engineering program”, 2000 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Engineering Education Beyond the Millennium, pp. 897–906, St. Louis, MO.
Pines, D., 2004, “Using computational fluid dynamics to excite undergraduate students about fluid mechanics”, ASEE 2004 Annual Conference and Exposition, “Engineering Education Researches New Heights”, pp. 14975–14982, Salt Lake City, UT.
Bhaskaran, R. and Collins, L. 2003, “Integration of simulation into the undergraduate fluid mechanics curriculum using FLUENT”, 2003 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Staying in Tune with Engineering Education, pp. 9151–9160, Nashville, TN.
R. D.
B. J.
, “
Flowlab: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) framework for undergraduate education
Proceedings of the 2002 ASME Joint U.S.-European Fluids Engineering Conference, Fluids Engineering Division (Publication) FED
, v
, n
B, forums, pp.
, Montreal, Que.
Cimbala, J., Moeykens, Sh., Kulkarni, A., and Parihar, A., 2004, “Using flowlab, a computational fluid dynamics tool, to facilitate the teaching of fluid mechanics”, 2004 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Mechanical Engineering Technology Department Heads, pp. 17-27, Anaheim, CA.
Stern, F., Muste, M., Xing, T., and Yarbrough, D., 2004, “Hands-on student experience with complementary CFD educational interface and EFD and uncertainty analysis for introductory fluid mechanics”, Proceedings of the ASME Heat Transfer/Fluids Engineering Summer Conference 2004, HT/FED2004, pp. 649-654, Charlotte, NC.
Stern, F., Xing, T., Yarbrough, D., Rothmayer, A., Rajagopalan, G., Otta, S. P., Caughey, D., Bhaskaran, R., Smith, S., Hutchings, B., and Moeykens, Sh., 2004, “Development of hands-on CFD educational interface for undergraduate engineering courses and laboratories”, ASEE 2004 Annual Conference and Exposition, “Engineering Education Researches New Heights”, pp. 3719-3749, Salt Lake City, UT.
Munson, B. R., Young, D. F., and Okiishi, T. H., 2005, Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics, 5th Ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Fox, R. W., McDonald, A. T., and Pritchard, P. J., 2005, Introduction to Fluid Mechanics, 6th Ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Crowe, C. T., Elger, D. F., and Roberson, J. A., 2005, Engineering Fluid Mechanics, 8th Ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.