A robust and sophisticated structural reliability evaluation procedure is presented. Reliability of any structural systems represented by finite elements can be evaluated using the algorithm. The authors called it a stochastic finite element method. Despite the significant recent progress in the risk and reliability analysis techniques, a large segment of the engineering profession is not familiar with them and thus fails to use them in everyday practices. The procedure is expected to fill that vacuum. Many sources of nonlinearity generally overlooked in the profession can be incorporated in the algorithm. Uncertainties in the load and resistance-related variables are modeled as realistically as possible. The estimation of the failure, probability implies that structural behavior just before failure needs to be captured as accurately as possible. The algorithm is capable of evaluating the probability of failure addressing all the related issues. With the help of four informative examples, the application potential of the procedure is clearly demonstrated. It is similar to the deterministic methods and is not expected to be complicated to the practicing engineers; thus, promoting its wider applications. It is shown that the observations made in laboratory experiments can be explained with the procedure. It is hoped that the method will be used in the future to estimate the reliability of real structures.

1.
Haldar, A., and Mahadevan, S., 2000a, Probability, Reliability And Statistical Methods In Engineering Design, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
2.
Haldar, A., and Mahadevan, S., 2000b, Reliability Assessment Using Stochastic Finite Element Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
3.
Kondoh
K.
, and
Atluri
S. N.
,
1987
, “
Large-Deformation, Elasto-Plastic Analysis Of Frames Under Nonconservative Loading, Using Explicitly Derived Tangent Stiffnesses Based On Assumed Stresses
,”
Computational Mechanics
,
2
(
1)
, pp.
1
25
.
4.
Haldar
A.
, and
Nee
K-M.
,
1989
, “
Elasto-Plastic Large Deformation Analysis Of PR Steel Frames For LRFD
,”
International Journal of Computers and Structure
,
34
(
5)
, pp.
811
823
.
5.
Huh, J., 1999, “Dynamic Reliability Analysis for Nonlinear Structures Using Stochastic Finite Element Method,” Report No. CEEM-99-101, Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
6.
Reyes
A. S.
, and
Haldar
A.
,
2001
, “
Energy Dissipation at PR Frames Under Seismic Loading
,”
Journal of the Structural Engineering, ASCE
,
127
(
5)
, pp.
588
592
.
7.
Richard
R. M.
, and
Abbott
B. J.
,
1975
, “
Versatile Elastic-Plastic Stress-Strain Formula
,”
Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division
, ASCE
101
, pp.
511
515
.
8.
Mehrabian, A., 2002, “Seismic Performance Of Steel Frames With A “Post-Northridge” Connection,” Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
9.
Richard, R. M., Allen, C. J., and Partridge, J. E., 1997, “Proprietary Slotted Beam Connection Designs,” Modern Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois.
10.
Seismic Structural Design Associates, Inc. (SSDA), 1999 and 2001, SSDA Beam Slot Connection Manuals.
11.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2000, “Seismic Design Criteria for Steel Moment-Frame Structures,” FEMA 350-353 and 355A-F, Washington, D.C.
12.
Mehrabian
A.
,
Haldar
A.
, and
Reyes
A. S.
,
2005
, “
Seismic Response Analysis Of Steel Frames With Post-Northridge Connection
,”
Steel and Composite Structures
,
5
(
4)
, pp.
271
287
.
13.
Gao
L.
, and
Haldar
A.
,
1995
, “
Safety Evaluation Of Frames With PR Connections
,”
Journal of Structural Engineering
, ASCE,
121
(
7)
, pp.
1101
1109
.
14.
Lee, S. Y., and Haldar, A., 2000, “Static and Dynamic Reliability Analysis of Frame and Shear Wall Structural Systems,” Report No. CEEM-01-101, Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
15.
Gupta
A. K.
, and
Akbar
H.
,
1983
, “
Cracking In Reinforced Concrete Analysis
,”
Journal of Structural Engineering
, ASCE,
107
(ST
1)
, pp.
1735
1746
.
16.
Liauw
T. C.
, and
Kwan
K. H
,
1985
, “
Static and Cyclic Behaviors Of Multistory Infilled Frames With Different Interface Conditions
,”
J. Sound and Vibration
,
99
(
2)
, pp.
275
283
.
17.
Vecchio, F.J., 1989, “Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Membranes,” ACI Structural Journal, 26–35.
18.
Lefas
D.
,
Kotsovos
D.
, and
Ambraseys
N.
,
1990
, “
Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Structural Walls: Strength, Deformation Characteristics, and Failure Mechanism
,”
ACI Structural Journal
,
87
(
1)
, pp.
23
31
.
19.
Inoue
N.
,
Yang
K.
, and
Shibata
A.
,
1997
, “
Dynamic Nonlinear Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Shear Wall By Finite Element Method With Explicit Analytical Procedure
,”
Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics
,
26
, pp.
967
986
.
20.
International Building Code, 2003, International Code Council, Virginia, U.S.A.
21.
Richard, R. M., 1993, PRCONN Manual, RMR Design Group, Tucson.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.