Driven by legal mandates and consumer demand, sustainable businesses will be those that recognize the need for extended responsibility for their products beyond the point of sale. One strategy gaining increasing attention throughout the world is the production and sale of Zero-to-Landfill products - products that contain nothing that is disposed of at the end of their useful life. A product take-back process is required to ensure products that reach the end of their useful lives are reclaimed for reuse, remanufacturing, or recycling. But can companies develop products that are truly zero-to-landfill? What must manufacturers do to deliver products offering this environmental beneficence? The stakeholders in a sustainable enterprise are considered, and the desire for zero-to-landfill products from their perspectives will be examined. Implications for government regulations, reverse logistics, product design and manufacturing, and for corporate profits are examined. The emphasis will be on how such a strategy will impact today's design and manufacturing engineers. Through the use of representative examples, it will be shown that many of the requisite behaviors and processes are being implemented, but that it is still early to quantify the impacts and to understand the emergence of unforeseen consequences.

1.
Brundtland Commission. Our Common Future - Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press: Oxford, England, 1987.
2.
Ehrlich, P.R. and A.H. Ehrlich. The Population Explosion. Simon and Schuster: New York, 1991.
3.
Webster’s New World Dictionary, 2nd College Edition. Simon and Schuster: New York, 1982.
4.
Anderson, R.C. Mid-Course Correction — Toward a Sustainable Enterprise: The Interface Model. Chelsea Green Publishing Company: White River Junction, VT, 1998.
5.
Ayres, R.U. and U. Simonis, eds. Industrial Metabolism: Restructuring for Sustainable Development. United Nations University Press: Tokyo, 1994.
6.
Quinn, D. Ishmael: An Adventure of the Mind and Spirit. Bantam / Turner: New York, 1992.
7.
Carson, R. Silent Spring. Houghton Mifflin Co.: Boston, 1962.
8.
Rekacewicz, P. UNEP/GRID-Arendal, Loss of tropical forest in developing regions, 1980-1990, UNEP/GRID-Arendal Maps and Graphics Library, http://maps.grida.no/go/graphic/loss_of_tropical_forest_in_developing_regions_1980_1990 (Accessed 9 August 2006).
9.
Rekacewicz, P. UNEP/GRID-Arendal, The richer we get, the more we discard, UNEP/GRID-Arendal Maps and Graphics Library, http://maps.grida.no/go/graphic/the_richer_we_get_the_more_we_discard (Accessed 9 August 2006).
10.
Rekacewicz, P. UNEP/GRID-Arendal, Projected trends in regional municipal waste generation, UNEP/GRID-Arendal Maps and Graphics Library, http://maps.grida.no/go/graphic/projected_trends_in_regional_municipal_waste_generation (Accessed 9 August 2006).
11.
McDonough, W. and M. Braungart. Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. North Point Press: New York, 2002.
12.
Hawken, P. The Ecology of Commerce: A Declaration of Sustainability. HarperCollins Publishers: New York, 1993.
13.
2002 Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey, http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/mecs/mecs2002/data02/pdf/table1.1_02.pdf. US Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration: Washington, DC, 2002.
14.
Energy fuel consumption of the manufacturing sector, by subsectors, http://www40.statcan.ca/cgi-bin/getcans/sorth.cgi?lan=eng&dtype=fina&filename=prim73.htm&sortact=2&sortf=6 (Accessed 9 August 2006). Statistics Canada: Ottawa.
15.
Waste Online, http://www.wasteonline.org.uk/resources/InformationSheets/Plastics.htm(last viewed August 11, 2006). Waste Watch: London.
16.
Municipal Solid Waste Generation, Recycling, and Disposal in the United States: Facts and Figures for 2003. US Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, D.C., 2005.
17.
Kaufman, S.M., N. Goldstein, K. Millrath, and N.J. Themelis, “The State of Garbage in America,” BioCycle, 2004.
18.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, http://www.epa.gov/msw/alum.htm, last viewed August 7, 2006.
19.
Solid Waste Management and Greenhouse Gases: A Life-Cycle Assessment of Emissions and Sinks, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, D.C., 2002.
20.
World Bank, Waste Management in China: Issues and Recommendations, Working Paper No. 9, East Asia Infrastructure Department, Washington, DC, 2005.
21.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, EPR Guidance Manual for Governments, OECD: Paris, 2001.
22.
Brown, L.R., Eco-Economy: Building an Economy for the Earth, W.W. Norton & Co.: New York, 2001.
23.
Franklin, P. Extended Producer Responsibility: A Primer, www.mindfully.org/Plastic/Extended-Producer-Responsibility.htm, 1997.
24.
Walls, M. Extended Producer Responsibility and Product Design: Economic Theory and Selected Case Studies. Resources for the Future: Washington, DC, 2006.
25.
The Netherlands Packaging Covenant (Stichting Verpakking en Milieu), 1991.
26.
Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging Waste) Regulations 1997 SI No. 648. UK Department of Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs (DEFRA).
27.
European Union (EU) Electrical and Electronic Products Directives: Directive on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE), Directive on the Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment (RoHS), INFORM: New York, 2003.
28.
Fleischmann
M.
,
Bloemhof-Ruwaard
J. M.
,
Dekker
R.
,
van der Laan
E.
,
van Nunen
J. A. E. E.
,
van Wassenhove
L. N.
, “
Quantitative Models for Reverse Logistics: a review
,”
European Journal of Operational Research
1997
,
103
,
1
17
.
29.
Steinhilper, R. “Recent Trends and Benefits of Remanufacturing: From Closed Loop Businesses to Synergetic Networks,” Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing (EcoDesign’01), 2001.
30.
Hauser, W.M. and R.T. Lund, The Remanufacturing Industry: Anatomy of a Giant, Boston University Department of Manufacturing Engineering: Boston, 2003.
31.
R.W. Beck, Inc. U.S. Recycling Economic Information Study. National Recycling Coalition Inc.: Washington, DC, 2001.
32.
Hammond
R.
,
Amezquita
T.
, and
Bras
B.
, “
Issues in the Automotive Parts Remanufacturing Industry: Discussion of Results from Surveys Performed among Remanufacturers
,”
Intl. J. Eng. Design and Automation
,
4
(
1)
,
27
46
,
1998
.
33.
Ross, A., “Is the core dead?” Jobber News, viewed at www.autoserviceworld.com, December 2002.
34.
Toffel
MW.
Strategic Management of Product Recovery
,”
California Management Review
,
46
(
2)
,
120
141
,
2004
.
35.
Amezquita
T.
,
Hammond
R.
,
Salazar
M.
,
Bras
B.
. “
Characterizing the remanufacturability of engineering systems
,”
Proceedings of the 1995 ASME Advances in Design Automation Conference, Boston, MA
,
82
,
271
278
,
1995
.
36.
Graedel, TE, and BR Allenby, Industrial Ecology, 2nd Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2003.
37.
Thierry
M.
,
Salomon
M.
,
Van Nunen
J.
,
Van Wassenhove
L.
. “
Strategic Issues in Product Recovery Management
,”
California Management Review
,
37
(
2)
,
114
134
,
1995
.
38.
“Product Stewardship,” Western Electronic Product Stewardship Initiative, www.recyclingadvocates.org/wepsi/ps.htm, last viewed May 23, 2006.
39.
Boyer, J. “An Improved Model of the Dynamic Behavior of a Zero-to-Landfill Product Strategy,” Proceedings of the 24th International System Dynamics Society, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 2006 (in press).
40.
EC Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive 94/62/EC (1994); revised in 2004 by amending Directive 2004/12/EC.
41.
The Boomerang Alliance, The Pathetic Package, Sydney, 2005 (viewed at http://www.boomerangalliance.org/000_files/42_July_EPHC_Report.pdf).
42.
Gitlitz, J. “Drink and Deposit,” Waste Management World, February 9, 2005.
43.
Kuehr, R. and E. Williams, Eds. Computers and the Environment: Understanding and Managing their Impacts. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, 2003.
44.
Guitini, R. and K. Gaudette. Remanufacturing: The next great opportunity for boosting US productivity. Business Horizons, November-December 2003.
45.
Mondal
S.
and
Mukharjee
K.
, “
An empirical investigation on the feasibility of remanufacturing activities in the Indian economy
,”
Int. J. Business Environment
,
1
(
1)
,
70
88
,
2006
.
46.
Ferrer
G.
and
Whybark
D. C.
, “
Material Planning for a Remanufacturing Facility
,”
Production and Operations Management
,
10
(
2)
,
112
124
,
2001
.
47.
Smith
V. M.
and
Keoleian
G. A.
, “
The Value of Remanufactured Engines
,”
J. Industrial Ecology
,
8
, (
1–2)
,
193
221
,
2004
.
48.
Muller, A. “Using End-of-Life Cost Estimates to Perform Design for Environment Investment Analysis: A Hewlett-Packard Case Study,” 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, Danvers, MA, 1999.
49.
Chen, R. W., D. Navin-Chandra, F.B. Prinz. “Product Design for Recyclability: A Cost Benefit Analysis Model and its Application,” 1st IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, Washington, D.C., 1993.
50.
Executive Summary, Workshop #39: Profiting from Eco-design — Developing Products that are Economically and Environmentally Sustainable (www.iapdonline.com/ws39es.htm, last viewed August 11, 2006). IAPD: Marlboro, MA, 2002.
51.
Jongeneelen, H. Towards a “Sustainable” Packaging Future, European Voice Conference, Brussels, 2004.
52.
Brown, R. “Natural Capitalism: When Green Means Clean and Profits,” Pollution Equipment News, April 2004.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.