Over two billion persons worldwide use biomass as their primary form of energy in household cooking. This creates significant adverse consequences to families in developing nations that use stoves made without technical advancements commonly used in the industrialized world. The often simple, ad-hoc stoves lead to harmful side effects including disease, pollution, injury, and deforestation. Further negative consequences arise in household economics when considering losses in labor, time spent gathering fuel, and high fuel costs relative to income. Because of this much research over the past 10-20 years has been conducted with developing better household cooking methods. Findings from these efforts produced more effective stoves to accommodate the needs of impoverished families. Many of these projects began with philanthropic interests and grants to aid the world's poor. However outside of lump-sum funds for materials and labor there is often be little available to sustain the technical or human resources needed for continued stove utilization. One method to approach sustainability involves a market-based approach to better insure continuation of the benefits of improved cookstoves. This paper provides an assessment of the benefits of advanced cooking devices to both consumers and producers. Further investigations demonstrate consumer and producer impediments in collaborating for mutual benefit. Through realization of the interests and constraints facing both sides, plausible processes can be drawn for holistic improvement of communities in relation to household cooking. This paper also provides various options for intervention and start-up as potential methods in creating sustainable markets for safe, cost-effective, and efficient stoves.

1.
Desai, M.A., Mehta, S., and Smith K.R. (2004). “Indoor smoke from solid fuels: Assessing the environmental burden of disease at national and local levels,” Geneva, World Health Organization, (WHO Environmental Burden of Disease Series, No. 4).
2.
Kammen
D. M.
(
1995
). “
Cookstoves for the Developing world
”,
Scientific American
,
273
:
72
75
.
3.
Yevich, R. & Logan J. A. (2002) “An Assessment of Biofuel Use and Burning of Agricultural Waste in the Developing World,” Submitted to Global Biogeochemical Cycles, June 30, 2002.
4.
Bruce N, Perez-Padilla R, Albalak R. (2002). The health effects of indoor air pollution exposure in developing countries. Geneva, World Health Organization.
5.
Ezzati
M.
,
Kammen
D. M.
, (
2002
). “
Household energy, indoor air pollution and health in developing countries: Knowledge base for effective interventions
,”
Annual Review of Energy and the Environment
,
27
:
233
270
.
6.
Smith K.R., Mehta S., and Maeusezahl-Feuz M. (2004). “Indoor smoke from household solid fuels,” in Ezzati M., Rodgers A.D., Lopez A.D., and Murray C.J.L. (eds) Comparative Quantification of Health Risks: Global and Regional Burden of Disease due to Selected Major Risk Factors, Geneva: WHO, 2:1437–1495.
7.
Bryden
K. M.
,
Ashlock
D. A.
,
McCorkle
D. S.
, and
Urban
G. L.
(
2003
). “
Optimization of heat transfer utilizing graph based evolutionary algorithms
”,
International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow
,
24
:
267
277
.
8.
McCorkle
D. S.
,
Bryden
K. M.
, and
Carmichael
C. G.
(
2003
). “
A new methodology for evolutionary optimization of energy systems
”,
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg.
,
192
:
5021
5036
.
9.
Johnson, N. G., Bryden, K. M., and Xiao, A. (2005) “Risk Analysis and Safety Evaluation of Biomass Cookstoves,” Proceedings of the 2005 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. Orlando, Florida.
10.
WCED (1987). Our Common Future. World Conference on Environment and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
Holling
C. S.
(
2001
) “
Understanding the Complexity of Economic, Ecological, and Social Systems
,”
Ecosystems
4
:
390
405
.
12.
Edwards
R. D.
,
Smith
K. R.
,
Zhang
J.
&
Ma
Y.
(
2004
) “
Implications of changes in household stoves and fuel use in China
,”
Energy Policy
,
32
:
395
411
.
13.
Bryden, K.M., Bond, T., Still, D., Ogle, D., & MacCarty, N. (to be submitted 2006) Comparing Cooking Stoves. Partnership for Clean Indoor Air, Shell Foundation, Aprovecho Research Center.
14.
Bryden, K.M., Still, D., Scott, P., Hoffa, G., Ogle, D., Bailis, R., & Goyer, K. (2005) Design Principles for Wood Burning Cook Stoves. Partnership for Clean Indoor Air, Shell Foundation, Aprovecho Research Center.
15.
ARTI, Appropriate Rural Technology Institute (2002). Rural Energy from Agrowaste. Available: http://www.arti-india.org/pages/tech14.htm [Accessed on May 5, 2006].
16.
SunSmile. (2004) Proposal for Development of a Hybrid Solar Oven for Rural Morocco. SunSmile, Berkeley, CA.
17.
Bannister
A.
(
2002
) “
The Sustainable Urban Livelihoods Framework — A Tool for Looking at the Links Between Energy and Poverty
,”
Boiling Point
,
48
:
7
10
.
18.
Mahat
I.
(
2003
) “
Gender Dimensions in Household Energy
,”
Boiling Point
,
49
:
27
29
.
19.
Prahalad, C.K. (2005). The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty Through Profits. University of Pennsylvania: Wharton School Publishing.
20.
Robinson, M. (1995). “The Paradigm Shift in Microfinance: A Perspective from HIID,” Development Discussion Paper #510, Harvard Institute for International Development.
21.
Lloyd-Ellis
H.
and
Bernhardt
D.
(
2000
). “
Enterprise, Inequality and Economic Development
,”
Review of Economic Studies
,
67
:
147
168
.
22.
Khandker, S.R. (1998). Fighting Poverty with Microcredit: Experience in Bangladesh. Oxford University Press for the World Bank, New York.
23.
Morduch
J.
(
1999
). “
The Role of Subsidies in Microfinance: Evidence from the Grameen Bank
,”
Journal of Development Economics
,
60
:
229
248
.
24.
Rai
A. S.
and
Sjo¨stro¨m
T.
(
2004
). “
Is Grameen Lending Efficient? Repayment Incentives and Insurance in Village Economies
,”
Review of Economic Studies
,
71
:
217
234
.
25.
Kaboski
J. P.
and
Townsend
R. M.
(
2005
). “
Policies and Impact: An Analysis of Village-Level Microfinance Institutions
,”
Journal of the European Economic Association
,
3
(
1)
:
1
50
.
26.
Woolcock, M (1999). “Learning from Failures in Microfinance: What Unsuccessful Cases Tell Us About How Group-Based Programs Work,” American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 58(1).
27.
Sinha
B.
(
2002
). “
The Indian Stove Programme: An Insider’s View — The Role of Society, Politics, Economics, and Education
,”
Boiling Point
,
48
:
23
26
.
28.
Fidler, L. and Webster, R.P. (1996), quote from The Informal Sector and Microfinance Institutions in West Africa, World Bank Regional and Sectoral Studies, in Lloyd-Ellis, H. and Bernhardt, D. (2000). “Enterprise, Inequality and Economic Development,” Review of Economic Studies, 67:147–168.
29.
Shastri
C. M.
,
Sangeetha
G.
, and
Ravindranath
N. H.
(
2002
). “
Dissemination of efficient ASTRA stove: case study of a successful entrepreneur in Sirsi, India
,”
Energy for Sustainable Development
,
4
(
2)
:
63
67
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.