The crosswind stability against overturning is a major design criterium for high speed railway vehicles. Due to the increasing interoperability in Europe it has also become an important international task. In recent years efforts have been made to derive an uniform rule in certifying railway vehicles. In this case especially probabilistic methods have been proposed These probabilistic techniques are common design criteria for wind turbines. A sophisticated method to compute the reliability of railway vehicles under strong crosswind is presented. In consideration of the given gust signal and the high-frequency turbulent fluctuations of the wind the response of a simplified train model is computed. The major failure criterion to determine the reliability is the lowest wheel-rail contact force of the railway vehicle. Special attention is given to the stochastic modeling of the high-frequency turbulent fluctuations of the wind and to the effect of these fluctuations on the crosswind stability.

1.
Fujii, T., Maeda, T., Ishida, H., Imai, T., Tanemoto, K., and Suzuki, M. “Wind-induced accidents of train/vehicles and their measures in japan”. Quarterly Report of Railway Technical Research Institut, 40, March.
2.
Role´n, C., Rung, T., and Wu, D., 2004. “Computational modelling of cross-wind stability of high-speed trains”. In Proc. European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering.
3.
Matscke
G.
,
Grab
M.
, and
Bergander
B.
,
2002
. “
Nach-weis der Sicherheit im Schienenverkehr bei extremem Seit-enwind
”.
Betrieb und Verkehr
,
51
, April, pp.
200
206
.
4.
Diedrichs
B.
,
Ekequist
M.
,
Stichel
S.
, and
Tengstrand
H.
,
2004
. “
Quasi-static modelling of wheel-rail reactions due to crosswind effects for varous types of high-speed rolling stock
”.
Journal Rail and Rapid Transit
,
218
, pp.
133
148
.
5.
Carrarini, A., 2004. “A probabilistic approach to the effects of cross-winds on rolling stock”. In Proc. European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering.
6.
Diedrichs
B.
,
2003
. “
On computational fluid dynamics modelling of crosswind effects for high-speed rolling stock
”.
Journal Rail and Rapid Transit
,
217
, pp.
203
226
.
7.
prEN 14067-1: 2003, 2003. Railway applications-Aerodynamics-Part1:Symbols and units. European standard.
8.
DeuFraKo-Projekt, 2003. Seitenwindverhalten von Schienenfahrzeugen. Schlussbericht.
9.
Simiu, E., and Scanlan, R. H., 1996. Wind effects on structures, 3. ed. ed. Wiley.
10.
Soong, T. T., and Grigoriu, M., 1993. Random vibration of mechanical and structural systems. Prentice Hall.
11.
Bierbooms
W.
, and
Cheng
P.-W.
,
2002
. “
Stochastic gust model for design calculations of wind turbines
”.
Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics
,
90
, pp.
1237
1251
.
12.
Proppe
C.
,
Pradlwarter
H.
, and
Schueller
G.
,
2003
. “
Equivalent Linearization and Monte Carlo Simulation in Stochastic Dynamics
”.
Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics
,
18
, pp.
1
15
.
13.
Au
S.
, and
Beck
J.
,
2003
. “
Important sampling in high dimensions
”.
Structural Safety
,
25
, pp.
139
163
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.