When sound quality has to be evaluated a number of difficulties arise. Although there are various attempts of evaluating it, there is no definitive approach which covers the diverse requirements with respect to subjective importance. Since the subjective evaluation will be influenced by different modifiers, the methods in question have to be adapted necessarily to the various objectives that are related to certain subjective as well as to physical, psycho-acoustic, and socio-acoustic variables. The evaluation of the perception of acoustic environments needs an interactive, integrating, transdisciplinary concept. What will to be discussed up front are contextual interdependencies, socio-acoustic, and psychological methods, the significance of the modifiers within the guided decision-making process as well as the importance of sensorial modifiers as they make up the foundation of the research process. In many studies focusing on sound quality the observation of context in general becomes an issue if the experimental setup or the instruction or even the respective stages of the experiment are regarded as contextual, i.e. sound evaluation or the evaluation of product-related sound quality always implies evaluation of lifestyles depending upon acceptance and therefore intimately related to the daily routine of the tested individual. evaluations of sounds are highly sensitive contextually, but at present there is no usage-oriented experimental instruction which sufficiently defines the contextual rapport within a given sound evaluation setup. the concept of sound quality evaluation needs to be broadened to integrate a subjective and psycho-social approach. a concept and procedure will be introduced for benchmarking and target sound development in context to appropriately evaluate the sound of the corporate identity introduction

1.
Schulte-Fortkamp
B.
Loudness Judgments on the Background of Subjective Experience with Environmental Sounds
” in:
Proceedings, Inter-Noise
94
, p.
791
796
, Yokohama, Japan,
1994
2.
A.L. Strauss, Qualitative analysis for social scientists, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990
3.
A. Fiebig, B. Schulte-Fortkamp, The importance of the Grounded Theory with respect to soundscape evaluation, DAGA, Strasbourg, France, 2004
4.
B. Schulte-Fortkamp The meaning of annoyance in relation to the quality of acoustic environments, in Prasher, D. (Ed) Noise pollution and health, NRN Publications, 39–44, 2003
5.
S. Paul, B. Schulte-Fortkamp, K. Genuit, Soundquality and Soundscape: A new qualitative approach to evaluate target sounds, Proc. 33rd Internoise, Prague, Czech Republic, 2004
6.
Muckel, P., Ensel, L., Schulte-Fortkamp, B., “Exploration of associated imaginations on sound perception (AISP): A method for helping people to describe and to evaluate their sound perceptions”, in J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 105, No.2, Pt 2, February 1999
7.
Schulte-Fortkamp, B. (2004) The quality of residential environments and its contextual significance with reference to soundscape evaluation, Proceedings ICA 2004, Kyoto, 22
8.
Schulte-Fortkamp, B., Genuit, K., Fiebig, A. (2005) The Acoustical Design of Vehicles - A Challenge for Qualitative Evaluation Minneapolis, Minnesota NOISE-CON 2005 CD and J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 118, No.3, Pt 2 of 2, September 2005, 1920
9.
Genuit, K., Schulte-Fortkamp, B., Fiebig, A (2005) The Acoustical Design of Vehicles - A New Tool for Benchmarking and Target Sound Minneapolis, Minnesota NOISE-CON 2005 CD and J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 118, No.3, Pt 2 of 2, September 2005, 1887
10.
Schulte-Fortkamp, B.(2005) Human response-the ultimate uncertainty, Acoustics Techniques, June 2005, Key note lecture, Symposium Le Mans: managing uncertainty in measurements and prediction, June 2005
11.
Schulte-Fortkamp, B. Genuit, (2005) Exploration of Associated Imaginations on Sound Perception A Subject-centered Method for Benchmarking of Vehicle, SAE, Traverse City May 2005
12.
Fiebig, A., Schulte-Fortkamp, B. (2005) Techniques of analysis and their applicability in the context of community noise, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 117, No.4, Pt 2 of 2, May 2005, 2590
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.