Accurate calibration is required for high-precision mechanical stages used for inspection of mechanical parts. Because of the high cost involved in purchasing and maintaining Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMM), it is common that a dedicated or reconfigurable inspection machine is designed and built to give a solution for a specific inspection task. High precision stages and high precision sensors that are needed for this task can be purchased as off the shelf products. However, when precision is needed, the assembly of the sensor to a linear stage becomes a complex task. This task becomes even more complex when using a non-contact probe since them are more unknowns added to the problem. In this paper we give a method for calculating the angle between the probe beam and the motion stage. The calculation is done directly from the measurements obtained by the non calibrated system. Using the calculated angle, the inverse of the affine transform resulting from the lack of perpendicularity between the probe beam and the motion stage can be determined and can be fixed in software. The method utilizes a high precision cylinder for the task. By using the proposed method, the assembly of a non contact probe to a linear motion stage becomes as simple as bolting down the bolts on the sensor connection panel. The method has been verified by computer simulation, with and without random noise added to the measurements. The results are presented via graphs and tables at the end of this paper.

1.
Evans
Chris J.
,
Hocken
Robert J.
, and
Estler
W. Tyler
, “
Self-Calibration: reversal, redundancy, error separation, and ‘absolute testing
,”
CIRP Annals
, Vol
45
/
2
,
1996
, pp
617
634
.
2.
Jiang H, Osawa S, Takatsuji T, Noguchi H and Kurosawa T 2002 High-performance laser tracker using an articulating mirror for the calibration of coordinate measuring machine Opt. Eng. 41 632
3.
Jun Ye, Errors in High-Precision Mask Making and Metrology, Solid State Electronics Laboratory, Semiconductor Research Corporation Contract No. MC-515, Mar. 1996, pp. 1-167.
4.
Kruth J P, Vanherck P and De Jonge L 1994 Self-calibration method and software error correction for three-dimensional coordinate measuring machines using artifact measurements Measurement 14 157
5.
Kunzman H, Trapet E and Waldele F 1990 A uniform concept for calibration, acceptance test, and periodic inspection of coordinate measuring machines using reference objects Ann. CIRP 39 561
6.
Raugh, M. R., “Two-dimensional stage self-calibration: Role of symmetry and invariant sets of points,” Journal of Vacuum Science Technology B, 15(6), Nov/Dec 1997.
7.
Raugh, Michael R., “Error estimation for lattice methods of stage self-calibration,” SPIE Proceedings: Microlithography ‘97: SPIE’s 22nd Annual International Symposium on Microlithography, 9-14 March, 1997, Santa Clara, CA.
8.
Raugh
M. R.
, “
Absolute two-dimensional sub-micron metrology for electron beam lithography: A theory of calibration with applications
,”
Precision Engineering
,
7
(
1)
, pp.
3
13
Jan
1985
.
9.
Raugh, M. R., “Absolute 2-D sub-micron metrology for E-beam lithography,” SPIE Proceedings Volume 480, Paper No. 21, 1984.
10.
Takac, M. T., “Self-Calibration in One Dimension,” 13th annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology and Management, Bellingham: SPIE, 1993.
11.
Takec, M. T. and John Whittey, “Stage Cartesian self-calibration: a second method,” Proceedings of SPIE, BACUS, 1998 forthcoming.
12.
Takac
M. T.
,
Ye
J.
,
Raugh
M. R.
,
Pease
R. F.
,
Berglund
C. N.
,
Owen
G.
, “
Self-calibration in two dimensions: the experiment
,”
SPIE Microlithography X, Bellingham: SPIE
, vol
2725
, pp
130
146
, 11–13 March
1996
.
13.
Takatsuji T, Goto M, Kirita A, Kurosawa T and Tanimura 2000 The relationship between the measurement error and the arrangement of laser trackers in laser trilateration Meas. Sci. Technol. 11 477
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.