It has long been recognized within the automotive safety community and by numerous biomechanical research studies that providing effective occupant protection in automotive rollover crashes requires effective occupant restraint. Effective occupant restraint includes, at the most basic level, preventing occupant ejection and providing sufficient control of occupant kinematics through the rollover event to prevent potentially injurious contacts with interior vehicle components. This paper examines both laboratory and real-world accident analysis of restraint performance in rollover-type environments. This includes studies involving static and dynamic testing with human surrogates and anthropometric test devices (ATDs). Additionally, the effects of rollover roof deformation on the restraint systems ability to control or affect occupant kinematics, when those restraint systems are anchored to the dynamically deforming structural components of the vehicle, are examined. Finally, various production and alternative restraint system designs are considered and discussed relative to their ability to control occupant kinematics and their influence on belted occupants' injury potential in the rollover crash mode. This paper will focus on the effect of seat belt looseness, or slack, and its relationship to occupant excursion during a rollover. Literature is referenced establishing that increased occupant excursion produces increased injury potential in rollovers, both by increasing the likelihood of injurious contacts with interior vehicle components as well as an increased risk of full and partial ejection. Four complete vehicle inversion studies (spit tests) are conducted with live surrogate occupants in production vehicle restraint systems. These studies document occupant excursions under a 1G inverted environment with various amounts of seat belt slack in production restraint systems as well as comparison tests using various alternative restraint configurations. Additionally three complete vehicle inverted drop tests are conducted in which the vehicles' roof structures and the upper torso belt anchors (D-ring) are instrumented to document their displacement while producing typical real-world type roof structure damage. The effect of this restraint anchor deformation is then examined relative to the occupant excursions evaluated in the spit tests. Lastly, a complete dolly rollover test conducted on a contemporary production mini van with production restrained anthropometric test devices (ATDs) is examined with a focus on the restraint system's geometry alterations and effectiveness through the multiple roll/roof contact events.

1.
Moffatt, E.A., James, M.B., 2005, “Headroom, Roof Crush, and Belted Excursion in Rollovers.” SAE 2005-01-0942, Reprint from Side Impact and Rollover (SP-1938)
2.
Friedman, K., Friedman, D., Forrest, F., Meyer, S., Herbst, B., Chng, D., Wang, P., 1996, “Restraint Effectiveness During Rollover Motion.”
3.
Herbst, B., Forrest, S., Wang, P., Chng, D., Friedman, D., Friedman, K., 1996m “The Ability of 3 Point Safety Belts to Restrain Occupants in Rollover Crashes,” Paper # 96-S5-O-12.
4.
Pywell, J., Rouhana, S., McCleary, J., DeSaele, K., 1997, “Characterization of Belt Restraint Systems in Quasistatic Vehicle Rollover Tests,” SAE 973334.
5.
Meyer, S., Herbst, B., 1997, “The Effects of Pretensioning of 3-Point Safety Belts on Occupants in Rollover Crashes”, NAFE 522M.
6.
Moffatt, E., Cooper, E., Croteau, J., Parenteau, C., Toglia, A., 1997, “Head Excursion of Seat Belted Cadaver, Volunteers andn Hybrid III ATD in a Dynamic/Static Rollover Fixture”. SAE 973347.
7.
Renfroe, D., 1996, “Rollover Ejection While Wearing Lap and Shoulder Harness: The Role of the Retractor,” SAE 960096.
8.
Meyer, S., Hock, D., Forrest, S., Herbst, B., Sances, A., Kumaresan, S., 2003, “Motor Vehicle Seat Belt Restraint System Analysis During Rollover,”, Presented at the 40th Annual Rocky Mountain Bioengineering Symposium & 50th International ISA Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation Symposium on Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation, April 2003.
9.
Grush, E. S., Henson, S.E., Ritterling, O.R., 1972, “Restraint System Effectiveness,” Highway Research Record No. 420, Highway Research Board, National Academy of Sciences, Wash, D.C.
10.
Sances, S., Kumaresan, S., Clarke, R., Herbst, B., Meyer, S., 2005, “Biomechanical Analysis of Occupant Kinematics in Rollover Motor Vehicle Accidents: Dynamic Spit Test,” Presented at Rocky Mountain Bioengineering Symposium & International ISA Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation Symposiu, April 2005.
11.
Rains, G.C., Van Voorhis, M.A., 1998, “Quasi Static and Dynamic Roof Crush Testing,” Technical Report No. DOT HS 808 873, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
12.
Forrest, S.M., Meyer, S.E., Herbst, B.R., 2000, “The Relationship of Roof Crush and Head Clearance on Neck Injuries in Rollovers,” 10th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering.
13.
Herbst, B.R., Forrest, S.M., Meyer, S.E., Chng, D., Davis, M., 2000, “Vehicle Crashworthiness in Vertical Drop Tests,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition.
14.
Herbst, B.R., Forrest, S.M., Meyer, S.E. Hock, Hock, D.A., 2001, “Improving Rollover Crashworthiness through Inverted Drop Testing,” SAE 2001-01-3213, Automotive and Transportation Technology Congress and Exhibition.
15.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2001, Request for Comments to the Docket No. NHTSA-1999-5572; Notice 2.
16.
Herbst, B.R., Forrest, S.M., Meyer, S.E., Hock, D.A., 2002, “Alternative Roof Crush Resistance Testing with Production and Reinforced Roof Structures,” SAE 2002-01-2076, Automotive and Transportation Technology Congress and Exhibition.
17.
Exponent, Dolly Rollover Test 1997 Ford Aerostar, TEC 9434, January 2006.
18.
Moffatt, E., Hare, B., Hughes, R., Lewis, L., liyama, H., Curzon, A., Cooper, E., 2003, “Head Excursion of Restrained Human Volunteers and Hybrid III Dummies in Steady State Rollover Tests,” 47th Annual Proceedings, Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, September 2003.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.