The analysis of fluid mixing in microfluidic systems is useful for many biological and chemical applications at the micro scale such as the separation of biological cells, chemical reactions, and drug delivery. The mixing of fluids is a very important factor in chemical reactions and often determines the reaction velocity. However, the mixing of fluids in microfluidics tends to be very slow, and thus the need to improve the mixing effect is a critical challenge for the development of the microfluidic systems. Micromixers can be classified into two types, active micromixers and passive micromixers. Passive micromixers depend on changing the structure and shape of microchannels in order to generate chaotic advection and to increase the mixing area. Thus, the mixing effect is enhanced without any help from external forces. Although passive micromixers have the advantage of being easily fabricated and requiring no external energy, there are also some disadvantages. For example, passive mixers often lack flexibility and power. Passive mixers rely on the geometrical properties of the channel shapes to induce complicated fluid particle trajectories thereby enhancing the mixing effect. On the other hand, active micromixers induce a time-dependent perturbation in the fluid flow. Active micromixers mainly use external forces for mixing including ultrasonic vibration, dielectrophoresis, magnetic force, electrohydrodynamic, and electroosmosis force. However, the complexity of their fabrication limits the application of active micromixers. In this paper we present a novel electroosmotic micromixer using the electroosmotic flow in the cross section to enhance the mixing effect. A DC electric field is applied to a pair of electrodes which are placed at the bottom of the channel. A transverse flow is generated in the cross section due to electroosmotic flow. Numerical simulations are investigated using a commercial software Fluent® which demonstrates how the device enhances the mixing effect. The mixing effect is increased when the magnitude of the electric field increased. The influences of Pe´clet number are also discussed. Finally, a simple fabrication using polymeric materials such as SU-8 and PDMS is presented.

1.
Manz
A.
,
Graber
N.
,
Widmer
H.
,
1990
, “
Miniaturised total chemical analysis systems: a novel concept for chemical sensing
,”
Sens. Actuators B
,
B1
, pp.
244
248
2.
Reyes
D.
,
Iossifidis
D.
,
Auroux
P.
,
Manz
A.
,
2002
, “
Micro total analysis systems. 1. Introduction, theory, and technology
,”
Ana Chem
,
74
, pp.
2623
2636
.
3.
Auroux
A.
,
Iossifidis
D.
,
Reyes
D.
,
Manz
A.
,
2002
, “
Micro total analysis systems. 2. Analytical standard operations and applications
,”
Ana Chem
,
74
, pp.
2637
2652
.
4.
Liu
R.
et al,
2000
, “
Passive mixing in a three-dimensional serpentine microchannel
,”
J. Microelectromech. Syst.
,
9
, pp.
190
197
5.
Mengeaud
V.
,
Josserand
J.
, and
Girault
H.
,
2002
, “
Mixing processes in a zigzag microchannel: finite element simulation and optical study
,”
Anal. Chem.
,
74
, pp.
4279
42886
6.
Park
S.
et al,
2004
, “
Rapid three-dimensional passive rotation micromixer using the breakup process
,”
J. Micromech. Microeng.
,
14
, pp.
6
14
7.
Stroock
A.
,
Dertinger
S.
,
Ajdari
A.
,
Mezic
I.
,
Stone
H.
, and
Whitesides
G.
,
2002
, “
Chaotic mixer for microchannels
,”
Science
,
295
, pp.
647
651
.
8.
Yang
Z.
et al.,
2000
, “
Active micromixer for microfluidic systems using lead-zirconate-ttitanate (PZT)-generated ultrasonic vibration
,”
Electrophoresis
,
21
, pp.
116
119
9.
Yang
Z.
et al.,
2001
, “
Ultrasonic micromixer for microfluidic systems
,”
Sensors Actuators A
,
93
, pp.
266
272
10.
Deval, J., Tabeling, P., and Ho, C., 2002, “A dielectrophoretic chaotic mixer,” Proc. MEMS’02, 15th IEEE Int. Workshop Micro Electromechanical System (Las Vegas, Nevada), pp. 36–39
11.
Mensing
G.
,
Pearce
T.
,
Graham
M.
, and
Beebe
D.
,
2004
, “
An externally driven magnetic microstirrer
,”
Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc.
,
362
, pp.
1059
1068
12.
Moctar
A.
,
Aubry
N.
, and
Batton
J.
,
2003
, “
Electro-hydrodynamic micro-fluidic mixer
,”
Lab on a Chip
,
3
, pp.
273
280
13.
Qian
S.
,
Bau
H.
,
A chaotic electroosmotic stirrer
,
Anal Chem.
2002
,
74
:
3616
3625
14.
Glasgow
I.
,
Batton
J.
, and
Aubry
N.
,
2004
, “
Electroosmotic mixing in microchannels
,”
Lab on a Chip
,
4
, pp.
558
562
15.
Biddiss
E.
,
Erickson
D.
,
Li
D.
,
2004
, “
Heterogeneous Surface Charge Enhanced Micromixing for Electrokinetic Flows
,”
Anal. Chem.
,
76
, pp.
3208
3213
16.
Jo
B.
,
Van Lerberghe
L.
,
Motsegood
K.
, and
Beebe
D.
,
2000
, “
Three-dimensional micro-channel fabrication in Polydimethylsiloxane(PDMS) elastomer
,”
Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems
,
9
, pp.
76
81
,
17.
Probstein, R., 1994, Physiochemical Hydrodynamics, 2nd ed., Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, Chap. 4.
18.
Adamson A., 1990, Physical Chemistry of Surfaces, Wiley Interscience Publication, New York, Chap. 5.
19.
Song, H., Si, T., Yin, X., 2005, “A 3-D Numerical Simulation of Electroosmotically Diven Flow,” The 8TH International Symposium on Fluid Control, Measurement and Visualization (Chengdu, Sichuan, China)
20.
Ottino, J., 1989, The Kinematics of Mixing: Stretching, Chaos, and Transport, Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, Chap. 4. and Chap. 5.
21.
Kang
T.
,
Kwon
T.
,
2004
, “
Colored Particle Tracking method for Mixing Analysis of Chaotic Micromixers
,”
Journal of Microengineering and Micromachining
,
14
, pp.
891
899
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.