Understanding ion and fluid transport through highly confined nanochannels is important for the study of many interesting phenomena in nature and for the design of novel nanofluidic devices. Molecular dynamics has been proved to be a powerful tool to investigate the transport of ion and fluid in nanochannels, however, the results of molecular dynamics simulation depend on the selection of intermolecular potentials in the simulation. In this work, we applied two different ionwater interaction potentials to study their effects in the molecular dynamics simulation of ion distribution in the nanochannels between two parallel charged surfaces. Water was simulated with the TIP4P and SPC/E models and the electrostatic interaction between ions, water molecules, and surface charges was modeled by using Ewald summation algorithm with the slab correction. Two different interaction potentials between the ion and water molecules, one based on simple Lennard-Jones potential and the other based on the Bounds' ion-water potential, were adopted to explore the effects of ion-water interactions on the ion distribution in nanochannels. The Bounds' model takes into account the interactions between ions and both oxygen and hydrogen atoms in the water molecules. Ion concentration profiles in nanochannels with these two different potentials were calculated and results showed that the ion-water interaction potential could significantly affect the ion distribution in nanochannels. We expect that the ion-water potential could also have important effect on modeling of electroosmotic flow through nanochannels.

Volume Subject Area:
Fluids Engineering
Topics:
Molecular dynamics simulation, Water, Fluids, Ions, Algorithms, Atoms, Design, Electroosmosis, Electrostatic interactions, Hydrogen, Lennard-Jones potential, Modeling, Molecular dynamics, Nanofluidics, Oxygen, Simulation, Slabs, Statistical process control
1.
Li
J.
,
Stein
D.
,
McMullan
C.
,
Branton
D.
,
Aziz
M. J.
, and
Golovchenko
J. A.
, “
Ion-Beam Sculpting at Nanometer Length Scales
,”
Nature
412
,
166
–
169
(
2001
).
2.
Fan
R.
,
Karnik
R.
,
Yue
M.
,
Li
D.
,
Majumdar
A.
, and
Yang
P.
, “
DNA Translocation in Inorganic Nanotubes
,”
Nano Lett.
5
,
1633
–
1637
(
2005
).
3.
Chang
H.
,
Kosari
F.
,
Andreadakis
G.
,
Alam
M. A.
,
Vasmatzis
G.
and
Bashir
R.
, “
DNA-Mediated Fluctuations in Ionic Current through Silicon Oxide Nanopore Channels
,”
Nano. Lett.
4
,
1551
–
1554
(
2004
).
4.
Smeets
R. M. M.
,
Keyser
U. F.
,
Krapf
D.
,
Wu
M.-Y.
,
Dekker
N. H.
, and
Dekker
C.
, “
Salt Dependence of Ion Transport and DNA Translocation through Solid-State Nanopore
,”
Nano. Lett
.
6
,
89
–
95
(
2006
).
5.
Karnik
R.
,
Fan
R.
,
Yue
M.
,
Li
D.
,
Yang
P.
, and
Majumdar
A.
, “
Electrostatic Control of Ions and Molecules in Nanofluidic Transistors
,”
Nano Lett
.
5
,
943
–
948
(
2005
).
6.
Spohr
E.
, “
Molecular Simulation of the Electrochemical Double Layer
,”
Electrochimica Acta
44
,
1697
–
1705
, (
1999
).
7.
SPohr
E.
, “
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Water and Ion Dynamics in the Electrochemical Double Layer
,”
Solid State Ionics
150
,
1
–
12
(
2002
).
8.
Spohr
E.
, “
Some Recent Trends in Computer Simulations of Acqueous Double Layers
,”
Electrochimca Acta
49
,
23
–
27
(
2003
).
9.
Mattke
T.
, and
Kecke
H.-J.
, “
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Single, Interacting, and Sheared Double Layers- 1. Configuration of A Double Layer
,”
J. Colloid and Interface Sci.
208
,
555
–
561
(
1998
).
10.
Mattke
T.
, and
Kecke
H.-J.
, “
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Single, Interacting, and Sheared Double Layers- 2. Influence of System Properties, Overlap, and Shear
,”
J. Colloid and Interface Sci.
208
,
562
–
569
(
1998
).
11.
Qiao
R.
and
Aluru
N. R.
, “
Ion Concentration and Velocity Profiles in Nanochannel Electroosmotic Flows
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
118
,
4692
–
4701
(
2003
).
12.
Freund
J. B.
, “
Electro-Osmosis in a Nanometer-Scale Channel Studied by Atomistic Simulation
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
116
,
2194
–
2200
(
2002
).
13.
W. Zhu, S. J. Singer, Z. Zheng, and A. T. Conlisk, “Electroosmotic Flow of A Model Electrolyte,” Physical Review E 71, Art. No. 041501 (2005).
14.
R. Qiao and N. R. Aluru, “Charge Inversion and Flow Reversal in a Nanochannel Electroosmotic Flow,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, Art. No. 198301 (2004).
15.
Jorgensen
W. L.
,
Chandrasekhar
J.
,
Madura
J. D.
,
Impey
R. W.
and
Klein
M. L.
, “
Comparison of Simple Potential Functions for Simulating Liquid Water
,”
J. Chem. Phys
.
79
,
926
–
935
(
1983
).
16.
Bounds
D. G.
, “
A Molecular Dynamics Study of the Structure of Water around the Ions Li+, Na+, K+, Ca++, Ni++ and Cl-
,”
Molec. Phys.
54
,
1335
–
1355
(
1985
).
17.
Miyamoto
S.
and
Kollman
P. A.
, “
SETTLE: An Analytical Version of the SHAKE and RATTLE Algorithm for Rigid Water Models
,”
J. Comp. Chem.
13
,
952
–
962
(
1992
).
18.
Yeh
I.
and
Berkowitz
M.
, “
Ewald Summation for Systems with Slab Geometry
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
111
,
3155
–
3162
(
1999
).
19.
Berendsen
H. J. C.
,
Postma
J. P. M.
,
van Gunsteren
W. F.
,
DiNola
A.
and
Haak
J. R.
, “
Molecular Dynamics with Coupling to an External Bath
,”
J. Chem. Phys
.,
81
,
3684
–
3690
(
1984
).
20.
J. Lyklema, Fundamentalsof Interface and Colloid Science, Academic Press, San Diego, 1995.
21.
Greberg
H.
and
Kjellander
R.
, “
Charge Inversion in Electric Double Layers and Effects of Different Sizes for Counterions and Coions
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
,
108
,
2940
–
2953
(
1998
).
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 2006
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.