Previous research has assumed that a perfect Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC) body temperature manager is available. Maintaining this temperature at a desired value can ensure a high reaction efficiency over all operation. However, fuel cell internal body temperature control has not been specifically presented so far. This work presents such control, using a Multiple Input Single Output (MISO) fuel cell cooling system to regulate the internal body temperature of a PEMFC intended for transportation. The cooling system plant is taken from a recently developed hydrogen/air PEMFC total system model. It is linearized and used to design a series of controllers via μ-synthesis. μ-synthesis is chosen since system nonlinearities can be handled as parameter uncertainties. A controller must coordinate the desired fuel cell internal temperature and commanded mass flow rates of the coolant and cooling air. Each linear controller is created for a segment of the expected current density range. Plant parameters are expected to vary over their linearized values in each segment. Also, a common set of μ-synthesis weighting functions has been developed to ease controller design at different operating points. Thus, the nonlinear cooling subsystem can be controlled with a series of current density scheduled linear controllers. Current density step change simulations are presented to compare the controller closed loop performance and open loop response which uses cooling system flow rates taken from an optimal steady state solution of the whole fuel cell system. Furthermore, a closed loop sinusoid response is also given. These show that the closed loop driven internal fuel cell temperature will vary little during operation. However, this will only be true over the range that the cooling system is required to be active.

1.
Larminie, J., and Dicks, A., 2003. Fuel Cell Systems Explained, 2nd. ed. JohnWiley & Sons Limited,West Sussex, England.
2.
Pukrushpan, J. T., Stefanopoulou, A. G., and Peng, H., 2004. Control of Fuel Cell Power Systems: Principles, Modeling, Analysis and Feedback Design, 1st. ed. Advances in Industrial Control. Springer-Verlag Limited, London, England.
3.
Pathapati
P.
,
Xue
X.
, and
Tang
J.
,
2005
. “
A New Dynamic Model for Predicting Transient Phenomena in a PEM Fuel Cell System
”.
Renewable Energy
,
30
(
1)
, pp.
1
22
.
4.
Xue
X.
,
Tang
J.
,
Smirnova
A.
,
England
R.
, and
Sammes
N.
,
2004
. “
System Level Lumped-Parameter Dynamic Modeling of PEM Fuel Cell
”.
Journal of Power Sources
,
133
(
2)
, pp.
188
204
.
5.
Zhang
Y.
,
Ouyang
M.
,
Lu
Q.
,
Luo
J.
, and
Li
X.
,
2004
. “
A Model Predicting Performance of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Stack Thermal Systems
”.
Applied Thermal Engineering
,
24
(
4)
, pp.
501
513
.
6.
Zhang, Y., Ouyang, M., Jianxi, L., Zhao, Z., and Yongjun, W., 2003. “Mathematical Modeling of Vehicle Fuel Cell Power System Thermal Management”. SAE Paper 2003-01-1146.
7.
Setlur
P.
,
Wagner
J. R.
,
Dawson
D. M.
, and
Marotta
E.
,
2005
. “
An Advanced Engine Thermal Management System: Nonlinear Control and Test
”.
IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics
,
10
(
2)
, pp.
210
220
.
8.
Alvarez-Ramirez
J.
,
Cervantes
I.
, and
Femat
R.
,
1997
. “
Robust Controllers for a Heat Exchanger
”.
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
,
36
(
2)
, pp.
382
388
.
9.
Meyer, R. T., and Yao, B., 2006. “Modeling and Simulation of a Modern PEM Fuel Cell System”. Proceedings of the 4th International Fuel Cell Science, Engineering and Technolgy Conference(To Be Presented).
10.
Omega Engineering, Inc., 2006. Thermocouple Tutorial. URL http://www.omega.com/thermocouples. html.
11.
Skogestad, S., and Postlethwaite, I., 1996. Multivariable Feedback Control: Analysis and Design, 1st. ed. John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, England.
12.
Zhou, K., and Doyle, J. C., 1998. Essentials of Robust Control, 1st. ed. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, USA.
13.
Balas, G., Chiang, R., Packard, A., and Safonov, M., 2005. Robust Control Toolbox User’s Guide: Version 3, 3rd. ed. MathWorks, Massachusetts, USA.
14.
Allen, R. W., Magdaleno, R. E., Serafin, C., Eckert, S., and Sieja, T., 1997. “Driver Car Following Behavior Under Test Track and Open Road Driving Condition”. SAE Paper 970170.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.