Hydro-pneumatic dampers are widely used in military and heavy vehicle suspension systems, where large suspension travel (more than 20 inches) is expected. Due to the nonlinear characteristics of these elements, suspension system performance and in particular ride comfort and road handling capabilities of the vehicle are altered. Although these nonlinear characteristics are inherent in nearly all vehicles suspension systems, their effects are dominant in certain maneuvers and especially in off-road conditions where the suspension system experiences rather large displacements. This paper investigates the control of a hydropneumatic damper suspension system, a highly nonlinear system comprised of a pneumatic spring (gas-spring) and a hydraulic damper. First, the hydro-pneumatic damper of a military vehicle is modeled. The model is validated using experiments performed with a dynamometer test machine. Based on the validated model, a 2DOF quarter car model is developed, simulated and analyzed. Secondly, the performance of two well-known semiactive control methods - Skyhook and Rakheja-Sankar (R-S) - are investigated as applied to suspension control in the 2DOF car model. To analyze the performance of these control strategies in the suspension systems where the nonlinear components exist, the method of averaging is deployed. Finally, a new control strategy based on Skyhook and R-S is proposed to address ride comfort and road handling utilizing the variable stiffness gas-spring together with a semiactive damper. The results of this new controller are then compared to that of several well known suspension control methods such as Skyhook to demonstrate the effectiveness of the method.

Volume Subject Area:
Dynamic Systems and Control
Topics:
Dampers, Military vehicles, Vibration control, Suspension systems, Roads, Springs, Vehicles, Control equipment, Dynamometers, Machinery, Military systems, Nonlinear systems, Stiffness
1.
Son
S.
,
Isik
C.
, (
1996
) “
Application of Fuzzy Logic to an Automotive Active Suspension System
”,
Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems
, Volume
1
,
8–11
, pp.:
548
–
553
.
2.
Crosby, M.J., Karnopp, D.C. (1973) “The active damper”, Shock and Vibration Bulletin, 43.
3.
Jianbo
L.
,
DePoyster
M.
 (
2002
) “
Multiobjective optimal suspension control to achieve integrated ride and handling performance
”,
IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology
, Vol.
10
, Issue
6
, pp.
807
–
821
.
4.
Mc Manus
S. J.
,
ST. Clair
K. A.
,
Boileau
P. E.
,
Boutin
J.
and
Rakheja
S.
 (
2002
) “
Evaluation of vibration and shock attenuation performance of a suspension seat with a semi-active magnetorheological fluid
”,
Journal of Sound and Vibration
,
235
(
1)
:
313
–
327
.
5.
Segel, L, (1993) “An overview of developments in road-vehicle dynamics: past present and future,” Proc. Of international Conference on Vehicle Ride and Handling. Birmingham, November 1993, IMECHE, paper C466/052, pp. 1-12.
6.
Anon (1997) “Mechanical vibration and shockevaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration.” International Organization for Standardization ISO 2631.
7.
Grifin
M. J.
 (
1998
) “
A comparison of standardized methods for predicting the hazards of whole-body vibration and repeated shocks
.”
Journal of Sound and Vibration
215
(
4)
, pp.
883
–
914
.
8.
British standard guide to measurement and evaluation of human exposure to whole body mechanical vibration and repeated shock. British Standards Institution, BS6841, 1987.
9.
Yu. Shen (2005) “Vehicle Suspension Vibration Control with Magnetorheological Dampers,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of waterloo, Canada.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 2006
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.