Different strategies have been used in the past to improve the performance of hydrocarbon emissions controllers in SI engines. One of them relies on the use of the model-based control design scheme, which offers the possibility of automating the controller design-to-implementation phase. It also gives the chance to update the model with a potential reduction in required experiments if physical changes are made to the plant. Under the model-based scheme, an accurate plant model can greatly enhance the development of an effective control systems. In particular, acquiring a correct fuel-dynamics model can be crucial in developing a good hydrocarbon emissions controller for coldstart. During this period, the factory AFR (air-fuel ratio) sensor is not active and the engine experiences an abrupt transient, which makes modeling difficult. In this paper, a model that describes fuel dynamics for coldstart is developed. The model uses mainly two parameters: one of them accounts for the fraction of injected fuel that runs directly into the cylinders and the other represents the time constant of fuel vaporization from the wall-wetting film formed in the intake port. Two discretized versions of the model are evaluated and compared. The parameters are calculated at different intake port temperatures. To implement the proposed model, experiments are carried out using a 4-cylinder SI MPFI combustion engine connected to a Simulink interface with capabilities of automatic code generation. Factory controller measurements and other external measurements such as intake port temperature and broadband AFR sensor measurements are used to fit the model parameters. Parameter identification techniques are used to identify the values of the parameters. Both versions of the fuel dynamics model are then tested during coldstart cycles and the results are analyzed.

1.
Heywood, J. B., 1988. Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals. McGraw-Hill, USA.
2.
Aquino, C., 1981. “Transient a/f control characteristics of the 5 liter central fuel injection engine”. SAE 810494.
3.
Hendricks, E., Vesterholm, T., Kaidantzis, P., Rasmussen, P., and Jensen, M., 1993. “Nonlinear transient fuel film compensation (ntfc)”. SAE 930767.
4.
Maloney, P. J., 1999. “An event-based transient fuel compensator with physically based parameters”. SAE 1999-01-0553.
5.
Moskwa
J.
,
1994
. “
Estimation of dynamic fuel parameters in automotive engines
”.
Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, Transactions of the ASME
,
116
(
4)
, December, pp.
774
780
.
6.
Onder, C., Roduner, C., Simons, M., and Geering, H., 1998. “Wall-wetting parameters over the operating region of a sequential fuel-injected si engine”. SAE 980792, February, pp. 123–131.
7.
Simons, M. R., Locatelli, M., Onder, C. H., and Geering, H. P., 2000. “A nonlinear wall-wetting model for the complete operating region of a sequential fuel injected si engine”. SAE 2000-01-1260.
8.
Arsie
I.
,
Pianese
C.
,
Rizzo
G.
, and
Cioffi
V.
,
2003
. “
An adaptive estimator of fuel film dynamics in the intake port of a spark ignition engine
”.
Control Engineering Practice
,
11
(
3)
, March, pp.
303
309
.
9.
Haluska, P., and Guzzella, L., 1998. “Control oriented modelling of mixture formation phenomena in multi-port injection si gasoline engine”. SAE 980628, February.
10.
Cipollone, R., Villante, C., and Sughayyer, M., 2005. “Online identification of fuel dynamics for a model-based injection control”. SAE 2005-01-0064.
11.
Tseng, T., and Cheng, W., 1999. “An adaptive air/fuel ratio controller for si engine throttle transients”. SAE 1999-01-0552, March.
12.
Souder
J.
, and
Hedrick
J. K.
,
2004
. “
Adaptive sliding mode control of air-fuel ratio in internal combustion engines
”.
International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control
,
14
(
6)
, pp.
525
541
.
13.
Ljung, L., 1999. System Identification, Theory for the user. Prentice Hall, USA.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.