Previous work in the literature developed similitude-based design scaling techniques that make it possible to take a proven system design and scale it to meet new desired dynamic characteristics. However, such similitude-based scaling is often too restrictive because it may not be feasible to satisfy all of the resulting scaling laws exactly. This paper uses a novel combination of activity-based model reduction and dimensional analysis to scale only the important components of a given dynamic system, thereby providing more freedom than pure similitude-based scaling. The viability of this proposed method is highlighted by two examples. The first example demonstrates the proposed efficient scaling methodology on a simple two-degree-of-freedom mass-spring-damper system. The second example uses the developed methodology to scale a fuel cell stack's air supply system design for a new set of fuel cell system power requirements. The examples highlight the flexibility that activity analysis adds to similitude-based scaling methods.

1.
Fathy, H.K., Ahlawat R., and Stein J.L., 2005, “Proper powertrain modeling for engine-in-the-loop simulation,” Proceedings, 2005 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Orlando, FL.
2.
Cho
Y. M.
, and
Rajamani
R.
,
2001
, “
Identification and experimental validation of a scalable elevator vertical dynamic model
,”
Control Engineering Practice
, 2001.
9
(
2)
, pp.
181
7
.
3.
Wei, X., and Rizzoni G., 2001, “A scalable approach for energy converter modeling and supervisory control design,” Proceedings, 2001 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, New York, NY.
4.
Cuddy
M. R.
, and
Wipke
K. B.
,
1997
, “
Analysis of the fuel economy benefit of drivetrain hybridization
,”
Proceedings of the 1997 International Congress and Exposition, SAE Special Publications
,
1243
: pp.
101
111
.
5.
Delagrammatikas, G.J. and Assanis D.N., 2004, “Development of a neural network model of an advanced, turbocharged diesel engine for use in vehicle-level optimization studies,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D, pp. 521-33.
6.
Bridgman, P.W., 1931, Dimensional Analysis, second ed. Yale University Press.
7.
Szirtes, T., 1997, Applied Dimesional Analysis and Modeling, McGraw-Hill.
8.
Macagno
E. O.
,
1971
, “
Historico-critical Review of Dimensional Analysis
,”
Journal of The Franklin Institute
,
292
(
6)
, pp.
391
402
.
9.
Ghanekar
M.
,
Wang
D. W. L.
, and
Heppler
G. R.
,
1997
, “
Scaling laws for linear controllers of flexible link manipulators characterized by nondimensional groups
,”
IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation
,
13
(
1)
, pp.
117
27
.
10.
Brennan
S.
, and
Alleyne
A.
,
2001
, “
Using a scale testbed: Controller design and evaluation
,”
IEEE Control Systems Magazine
,
21
(
3)
, pp.
15
2
6
11.
Vassalos
D.
,
1999
, “
Physical modelling and similitude of marine structures
,”
Ocean Engineering (Pergamon)
,
26
(
2)
, pp.
111
123
.
12.
Wu
J. J.
,
Cartmell
M. P.
, and
Whittaker
A. R.
,
2002
, “
Prediction of the vibration characteristics of a full-size structure from those of a scale model
,”
Computers and Structures
,
80
(
18–19)
, pp.
1461
1472
.
13.
Baker, W.E., and Squire W., Similarity methods in engineering dynamics. Applied Mechanics Reviews. Vol. 45.
14.
Soedel
W.
,
1971
,
Similitude approximations for vibrating thin shells
.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
,
49
(
5)
: p.
1535
41
.
15.
Louca
L. S.
,
Stein
J. L.
, and
Hulbert
G. M.
,
1998
, “
A Physical-Based Model Reduction Metric with an Application to Vehicle Dynamics
,”
Proceedings of the 4th IFAC Nonlinear Control Systems Design Symposium (NOLCOS 1998)
, Vol.
3
, pp.
607
612
, Enschede, The Netherlands.
16.
Schuring, D.J., 1977, Scale Models in Engineering: Fundamentals and Applications, Pergamon Press.
17.
Rezaeepazhand, J., and Simitses G.J., 1995, “Design of scaled down models for predicting shell vibration response,” Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference and AIAA/ASME Adaptive Structures Forum, Part 3 (of 5), New Orleans, LA.
18.
Rideout, D.G., Louca, L.S., and Stein, J.L., “System partitioning and physical-domain model reduction through assessment of bond graph junction structure,” Proceedings of IMAACA’04, Bond Graph Techniques for Modeling Dynamic Systems, Genoa, Italy.
19.
Pukrushpan, J.T., 2003, Modeling and Control of Fuel Cell Systems and Fuel Processors, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan.
20.
Gelfi, S., et al., 2003 “Dynamics of low-pressure and highpressure fuel cell air supply systems,” Proceedings of 2003 American Control Conference, Denver, CO.
21.
Karnopp, D.C., Margolis, D.L., and Rosenberg, R.C., 1990, System Dynamics: A Unified Appraoach. Third edition ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
22.
Wright, T.,1983, Fluid Machinery: Performance, Analysis, and Design. 1st ed., CRC Press LLC.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.