Prediction of machine dynamics at the design stage is a challenge due to lack of adequate methods for identifying and handling the nonlinearities in the machine joints, which appear as the nonlinear restoring force function of relative displacement and relative velocity across the joint. This paper discusses identification of such a nonlinear restoring force function for an industrial translational guide for use with the Nonlinear Receptance Coupling Approach (NLRCA) for evaluating machine dynamic characteristics. Translational guides are among the most commonly used joints in machine tools. Both a parametric and nonparametric technique has been employed to identify the nonlinearities. A novel parametric model based on Hertzian contact mechanics has been derived for the translational guide. This model includes the effect of joint geometry, material properties and preload. A nonparametric method based on two-dimensional Chebyshev polynomials is also used. The models derived from the two techniques, i.e., parametric and nonparametric, are fitted to the experimental data derived from static and dynamic tests to get the restoring force as a function of relative displacement and relative velocity across the joint. The resulting joint model exhibits a weakly nonlinear stiffness term and a viscous damping term. The results from both techniques are compared in the frequency domain. The advantages and disadvantages of parametric and nonparametric techniques are also discussed. The design of experiments for evaluating the nonlinearities in such industrial machine tool joints is a challenge, requiring careful alignment and calibration, because they are typically very stiff. This constrains the dynamic experiments to be carried out at high frequencies (e.g. 2000-7000Hz) where the experimental readings are very sensitive to errors in geometry and calibration.

1.
Moon
Y.-M.
and
Kota
S.
,
2002
, “
Design of reconfigurable machine tools
,”
Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Transactions of the ASME
,
124
(
2)
, pp.
480
483
.
2.
Moon, Y.-M., 2000, Reconfigurable machine tool design: Theory and application,PhD. Thesis, Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, pp. 166.
3.
Bishop, R. E. D. and Johnson, D. C., 1960, The mechanics of vibrations, Cambridge University Press.
4.
Ferreira, J. V. and Ewins, D. J., 1996, “Nonlinear receptance coupling approach based on describing functions,” 14th International Modal Analysis Conference, pp. 1034–1040.
5.
Yigit
A. S.
and
Ulsoy
A. G.
,
2002
, “
Dynamic stiffness evaluation for reconfigurable machine tools including weakly non-linear joint characteristics
,”
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture
,
216
(
1)
, pp.
87
101
.
6.
Johnson
K. L.
,
1982
, “
100 years of hertz contact
,”
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers
,
196
, pp.
363
378
.
7.
Greenwood
J. A.
and
Williamson
J. B. P.
,
1966
, “
Contact of nominally flat surfaces
,”
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences
,
295
(1442), pp.
1442
1442
.
8.
Dahl
P. R.
,
1976
, “
Solid friction damping of mechanical vibrations
,”
AIAA Journal
,
14
(
12)
, pp.
1675
1675
.
9.
de Wit
C. C.
,
Olsson
H.
,
Astrom
K. J.
and
Lischinsky
P.
,
1995
, “
New model for control of systems with friction
,”
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
,
40
(
3)
, pp.
419
419
.
10.
Swevers
J.
,
Al Bender
F.
,
Ganseman
C. G.
and
Prajogo
T.
,
2000
, “
Integrated friction model structure with improved presliding behavior for accurate friction compensation
,”
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
,
45
(
4)
, pp.
675
675
.
11.
Lee
G. M.
,
1997
, “
Estimation of non-linear system parameters using higher-order frequency response functions
,”
Mechanical Systems & Signal Processing
,
11
(
2)
, pp.
219
219
.
12.
Masri, S. F., Sassi, H. and Caughey, T. K., 1982, “Nonparametric identification of nonlinear systems,” ASME, New York, NY, USA, pp. 467.
13.
Worden, K. and Tomlinson, G. R., 2001, Nonlinearity in structural dynamics: Detection, identification, and modelling, Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, UK.
14.
Masri
S. F.
,
Sassi
H.
and
Caughey
T. K.
,
1982
, “
Nonparametric identification of nearly arbitrary nonlinear systems
,”
Journal of Applied Mechanics, Transactions ASME
,
49
(
3)
, pp.
619
619
.
15.
Yasuda
K.
and
Kamiya
K.
,
1999
, “
Experimental identification technique of nonlinear beams in time domain
,”
Nonlinear Dynamics
,
18
(
2)
, pp.
185
185
.
16.
Kapania, R. K. and Park, S., 1996, “Parametric identification of nonlinear structural dynamic systems using finite elements in time,” AIAA, New York, NY, USA, pp. 674.
17.
Mohammad
K. S.
,
Worden
K.
and
Tomlinson
G. R.
,
1992
, “
Direct parameter estimation for linear and non-linear structures
,”
Journal of Sound and Vibration
,
152
(
3)
, pp.
471
471
.
18.
Benhafsi
Y.
,
Penny
J. E. T.
and
Friswell
M. I.
,
1995
, “
Identification of damping parameters of vibrating systems with cubic stiffness nonlinearity
,”
Proceedings of the 13th International Modal Analysis Conference.
,
2460
, pp.
623
629
.
19.
O’F.Fahey, S. and Nayfeh, A. H., 1998, “Experimental nonlinear identification of a single structural mode,” SEM, Bethel, CT, USA, pp. 737.
20.
Yasuda
K.
,
Kamiya
K.
and
Komakine
M.
,
1997
, “
Experimental identification technique of vibrating structures with geometrical nonlinearity
,”
Journal of Applied Mechanics, Transactions ASME
,
64
(
2)
, pp.
275
275
.
21.
Rivin, E. I., 1999, Stiffness and damping in mechanical design, Marcel Dekker, New York.
22.
Dhupia, J., Powalka, B., Katz, R. and Ulsoy, A. G., 2006, “Dynamics of the arch-type reconfigurable machine tool,” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, In Press.
23.
Dhupia, J., Powalka, B., Ulsoy, A. G. and Katz, R., 2006, “Effect of a nonlinear joint on the dynamic performance of a machine tool,” CIRP - 2nd International Conference on High Performance Cutting.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.