The sandwich structures in aerospace industry experience high noise transmissions since they are often stiff and light, and have low damping. Optimization studies of sandwich structures for noise transmission are relatively fewer. Most optimization studies in composite sandwich community seek for high stiffness with minimal weight. Advanced sandwiches must meet not only stiffness to weight ratio demands, but also have improved acoustic transmission performance. This paper presents recent advances in optimization of sandwich structures for minimum sound transmission. The finite element models of sandwich beams and plates are presented in this paper. The acoustic radiation of the structure is computed by using the Rayleigh integral. Sensitivity plays an important role in optimization studies. Analytical expressions of sensitivity can improve computational efficiency dramatically and accuracy at the same time. The explicit sensitivity functions of power and natural frequencies with respect to design parameters are derived in this work. In the optimization studies, we have considered structural parameters that can influence the transverse propagation of sound from the sandwich to the acoustic medium. These parameters include core topology and coupling stiffiness between in- and out-of-plane strains. We also study the optimization of the structure with respect to the structural boundary conditions to minimize the sound transmission. Numerical examples of single tone and broadband applications are presented in the paper. The results show that significant reduction of sound transmission across sandwich structures can be obtained. Finally, it should be noted that the novel optimized sandwich structures can meet not only stiffness to weight ratio demands, but also have significantly improved acoustic performance.

1.
Vinson, J. R., The Behavior of Sandwich Structures and Isotropic Composite Materials, Technomic Publishing Company, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 1999.
2.
Vinson, J. R. and Sierakowski, R. L., The Behavior of Structures of Composite Materials, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrect, The Netherlands, 2002.
3.
Tinnsten
M.
, “
Optimization of acoustic response - A numerical and experimental comparison
,”
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
, Vol.
19
, No.
2
,
2000
, pp.
122
129
.
4.
Thamburaj
P.
and
Sun
J. Q.
, “
Optimization of anisotropic sandwich beams for higher sound transmission loss
,”
Journal of Sound and Vibration
, Vol.
254
, No.
1
,
2002
, pp.
23
36
.
5.
Denli
H.
,
Sun
J. Q.
, and
Chou
T. W.
, “
Minimization of Acoustic Radiation from Composite Sandwich Beam Structures
,”
AIAA Journal
, Vol.
43
, No.
11
,
2005
, pp.
2337
2341
.
6.
Evans
A. G.
,
Hutchinson
J. W.
,
Fleck
N. A.
,
Ashby
M. F.
, and
Wadley
H. N. G.
, “
Topological design of multifunctional cellular metals
,”
Progress in Materials Science
, Vol.
46
, No.
3–4
,
2001
, pp.
309
327
.
7.
Ruzzene
M.
, “
Vibration and sound radiation of sandwich beams with honeycomb truss core
,”
Journal of Sound and Vibration
, Vol.
277
, No.
4–5
,
2004
, pp.
741
763
.
8.
Scarpa
F.
and
Tomlinson
G.
, “
Theoretical characteristics of the vibration of sandwich plates with in-plane negative Poisson’s ratio values
,”
Journal of Sound and Vibration
, Vol.
230
, No.
1
,
2000
, pp.
45
67
.
9.
Ruzzene
M.
,
Scarpa
F.
, and
Soranna
F.
, “
Wave beaming effects in two-dimensional cellular structures
,”
Smart Materials and Structures
, Vol.
12
, No.
3
,
2003
, pp.
363
372
.
10.
Keane
A. J.
, “
Passive vibration control via unusual geometries: The application of genetic algorithm optimization to structural design
,”
Journal of Sound and Vibration
, Vol.
185
, No.
3
,
1995
, pp.
441
453
.
11.
Anthony
D. K.
,
Elliott
S. J.
, and
Keane
A. J.
, “
Robustness of optimal design solutions to reduce vibration transmission in a lightweight 2-D structure, Part I: Geometric design
,”
Journal of Sound and Vibration
, Vol.
229
, No.
3
,
2000
, pp.
505
528
.
12.
Denli
H.
,
Frangakis
S.
, and
Sun
J. Q.
, “
Normalizations in acoustic optimization with Rayleigh integral
,”
Journal of Sound and Vibration
, Vol.
284
, No.
3–5
,
2005
, pp.
1229
1238
.
13.
Koopmann, G. H. and Fahnline, J. B., Designing Quiet Structures, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, California, 1997.
14.
Ohlrich
M.
and
Hugin
C. T.
, “
On the influence of boundary constraints and angled baffle arrangements on sound radiation from rectangular plates
,”
Journal of Sound and Vibration
, Vol.
277
, No.
1–2
,
2004
, pp.
405
418
.
15.
Muthukumaran
P.
,
Bhat
R. B.
, and
Stiharu
I.
, “
Boundary conditioning technique for structural tuning
,”
Journal of Sound and Vibration
, Vol.
220
, No.
5
,
1999
, pp.
847
859
.
16.
Son
J. H.
and
Kwak
B. M.
, “
Optimization of boundary conditions for maximum fundamental frequency of vibrating structures
,”
AIAA Journal
, Vol.
31
, No.
12
,
1993
, pp.
2351
2357
.
17.
Won
K. M.
and
Park
Y. S.
, “
Optimal support positions for a structure to maximize its fundamental natural frequency
,”
Journal of Sound and Vibration
, Vol.
213
, No.
5
,
1998
, pp.
801
812
.
18.
Marcelin
J. L.
, “
Genetic optimization of supports in vibrating structures
,”
Engineering Optimization
, Vol.
34
, No.
1
,
2002
, pp.
101
107
.
19.
Pan
X.
and
Hansen
C. H.
, “
Effect of end conditions on the active control of beam vibration
,”
Journal of Sound and Vibration
, Vol.
168
, No.
3
,
1993
, pp.
429
448
.
20.
Buhl
T.
, “
Simultaneous topology optimization of structure and supports
,”
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
, Vol.
23
, No.
5
,
2002
, pp.
336
346
.
21.
Bendsoe, M. P. and Sigmund, O., Topology optimization: theory, methods and application, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Germany, 2003.
22.
Kant
T.
and
Swaminathan
K.
, “
Estimation of transverse/interlaminar stresses in laminated composites - a selective review and survey of current developments
,”
Composite Structures
, Vol.
49
, No.
1
,
2000
, pp.
65
75
.
23.
Reddy
J. N.
, “
An evaluation of equivalent-single-layer and layerwise theories of composite laminates
,”
Composite Structures
, Vol.
25
, No.
1–4
,
1993
, pp.
21
35
.
24.
Bathe, K.-J., Finite Element Procedures, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 1996.
25.
Reddy, J. N., Mechanics of Laminated Composite Plates and Shells: Theory and Analysis, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 2003.
26.
Naghshineh
K.
,
Koopmann
G. H.
, and
Belegundu
A. D.
, “
Material tailoring of structures to achieve a minimum radiation condition
,”
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
, Vol.
92
, No.
2
, Pt. 1,
1992
, pp.
841
855
.
27.
Salagame
R. R.
,
Belegundu
A. D.
, and
Koopmann
G. H.
, “
Analytical sensitivity of acoustic power radiated from plates
,”
Journal of Vibration and Acoustics
, Vol.
117
, No.
1
,
1995
, pp.
43
48
.
28.
Kim
N. H.
,
Dong
J.
,
Choi
K. K.
,
Vlahopoulos
N.
,
Ma
Z. D.
,
Castanier
M. P.
, and
Pierre
C.
, “
Design sensitivity analysis for sequential structural-acoustic problems
,”
Journal of Sound and Vibration
, Vol.
263
, No.
3
,
2003
, pp.
569
591
.
29.
Choi, K. K. and Kim, N. H., Structural Sensitivity Analysis and Optimization, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2005.
30.
Bertsekas, D. P., Constrained Optimization and Lagrange Multiplier Methods, Academic Press, New York, 1982.
31.
Wicks
N.
and
Hutchinson
J. W.
, “
Optimal truss plates
,”
International Journal of Solids and Structures
, Vol.
38
, No.
30–31
,
2001
, pp.
5165
5183
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.