This paper demonstrates the potential impact of indoor air distribution on the energy consumption of central HVAC systems with cognizance of human thermal comfort. The study focuses on a hypothetical high-performance house incorporating a split heat pump system. The air distribution of this building incorporates high sidewall supply-air registers and near-floor, wall-mounted return-air grilles. Heating-mode stratification resulting from this prevalent configuration is a prime example of situations in which challenges regarding energy efficiency, comfort, and ventilation effectiveness emerge. These challenges underline the importance of adopting a comprehensive design strategy for high-performance buildings. Two indoor air distribution scenarios were analyzed: (1) theoretically well mixed and (2) poorly mixed, representing a realistic case. The former scenario was evaluated using an analytical approach, whereas the latter was investigated through computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. For heating mode, the results indicated the presence of a pronounced thermal stratification resulting from poor air mixing. At 50% of the design heating load, for the well-mixed case, the HVAC system energy consumption was significantly higher. Considerably better air distribution performance was observed with cooling mode, in which the relative energy penalty for the well-mixed scenario was noticeably less. In real-world applications where measures must be taken to achieve near perfectly mixed indoor conditions for better comfort, the energy use is expected to be even higher. However, in the absence of such measures, the thermostat setpoint is likely to be readjusted, leading to a higher energy use without necessarily improving the overall comfort level, as demonstrated in this paper. The limitation of increasing the supply-air flow rate to enhance air mixing and diffusion is also discussed in terms of the system moisture removal capability.

Volume Subject Area:
Advanced Energy Systems
Topics:
Heat pumps, Residential construction, Energy consumption, Heating, Computational fluid dynamics, Design, HVAC equipment, Cooling, Diffusion (Physics), Energy efficiency, Flow (Dynamics), Simulation, Stress, Structures, Temperature controls, Thermal stratification, Ventilation
1.
Building America Program, www.eere.energy.gov/buildings/building_america/.
2.
ENERGY STAR Program, www.energystar.gov/.
3.
California Energy Commission, www.energy.ca.gov/.
4.
ASHRAE. 2005. 2005 ASHRAE Handbook-Fundamentals. Chapter 27. Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.
5.
Fisk, W. J., Faulkner, D., Sullivan, D., and Bauman, F. 1997. “Air Change Effectiveness and Pollutant Removal Efficiency During Adverse Mixing Conditions,” LBNL-40292, Berkley, CA: Lawrence Berkley National Laboratory.
6.
Fluent v. 6.2 Software, www.fluent.com/software/fluent/.
7.
Chen
Q.
,
Hoornstra
T. G.
, and
Van Der Kooi
J.
1990
. “
Energy Analysis of Buildings with Different Air Supply and Exhaust Systems
,”
ASHRAE Transaction
, Vol.
96
, Part 1, pp.
344
–
356
.
8.
EnergyGauge USA: A Residential Building Energy Simulation Design Tool, www.energygauge.com.
9.
ASHRAE. 2005. 2005 ASHRAE Handbook-Fundamentals. Chapter 8. Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.
10.
ASHRAE. 2004. ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2004. Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.