Cutting force predictions from machining process models are generally accurate to within 20% for a specific tool and work material combination over a wide range of cutting conditions when calibrations are accurately performed. The calibration implicitly assumes that the tool used in the cut has a sharp cutting edge (zero radius) or identical (and maybe unknown) cutting edge radius. Significantly higher errors (more than 20%) in force calculations are seen when the same calibration data is used for predictions across a wide range of edge radii, also referred to as an edge hone. This paper describes the preliminary experimental work done to understand the impact of a honed cutting edge on the calibration of the force coefficients used by mechanistic models. Tube turning tests were performed on gray cast iron using tools of varying edge radii, and the cutting and thrust forces measured. Useful correlations between the edge radius and the machining force were observed although some of the results were confounded by variations in the temperature at the cutting edge. A new mechanistic calibration approach is applied to obtain the force coefficients from the measured forces that gives accurate results when the ratio of chip thickness to edge radius is used to calibrate the forces. This method has the advantage of being dependent only on the geometric size of the honed edge in relation to the thickness of the chip that is being removed. This allows the calibration to be performed with lesser experimental effort, while still being valid for predictions over a wide range of edge radii. Validation of this approach was performed using a range of edge hone sizes with peak force prediction errors less than 17%.

1.
Abdelmoneim
M. E.
And
Scrutton
R. F.
, “
Tool Edge Roudness and Stable Build–up Formation in Finish Machining
,”
Transactions of ASME, Journal of Engineering for Industry
,
1974
, Vol.
96
, pp.
1258
1267
.
2.
Altintas
Y.
and
Spence
A.
, “
End Milling Force Algorithms for CAD Systems
,”
Annals of CIRP
, Vol.
40
,
1991
1991
.
3.
Arsecularatne
J. A.
, “
On Tool-Chip Interface Stress Distributions, Ploughing Force and Size Effect in Machining
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.
,
1997
, Vol.
37
, No.
7
, pp.
885
889
.
4.
Albrecht
P.
, “
New Development in the Theory of the Metal-Cutting Process: Part I
,”
Transactions of ASME, Journal of Engineering for Industry
,
1960
, Vol.
82
, pp.
348
358
.
5.
Albrecht
P.
, “
New Development in the Theory of the Metal-Cutting Process: Part II
,”
Transactions of ASME, Journal of Engineering for Industry
,
1961
, Vol.
83
, pp.
557
571
.
6.
Bitans
K.
and
Brown
R. H.
, “
An Investigation of the Deformation in Orthogonal Cutting
,”
1965
,
Int. J. Mach. Tool Des.
, 1965, Vol.
5
, pp,
155
165
.
7.
Budak
E.
,
Altintas
Y.
,
Armarego
E. J. A.
, “
Prediction of Milling Force Coefficients from Orthogonal Cutting Data
,”
Transactions of ASME
, Vol.
118
, May
1996
, pp.
216
224
.
8.
Connolly
R.
and
Rubenstein
C.
, “
The Mechanics of Continuous Chip Formation in Orthogonal Cutting
,”
Int. J. Mach. Des. & Res.
,
1968
, Vol.
8
, pp.
159
167
.
9.
Elanayar
S.
and
Shin
Y. C.
, “
Modeling of Tool Forces for Worn Tools: Flank Wear Effects
,”
1996
,
Transactions of ASME, Journal of Engineering for Industry
, 1996, Vol.
118
, pp.
359
366
.
10.
Endres
W. J.
,
DeVor
R. E.
,
Kapoor
S. G.
, “
A Dual Mechanism Approach to the Prediction of Machining Forces — Parts 1 and 2
,”
Transactions of ASME, Journal of Engineering for Industry
,
1995
, Vol.
117
, pp.
526
542
.
11.
Endres
W. J.
,
Waldorf
D. J.
, “
The Importance of Considering Size Effect Along the Cutting Edge in Predicting the Effective Lead Angle for Turning
,”
Transactions of NAMRI/SME
, Vol.
XXII
,
1994
, pp.
65
72
.
12.
Fang
N.
, “
Slip-line modeling of machining with a rounded-edge tool — Part I: new model and theory
,”
Journal of Mechanics and Physics of Solids
, Vol.
51
,
2003
, pp.
715
742
.
13.
Fang, N., “Slip-line modeling of machining with a rounded-edge tool — Part II: analysis of the size effect and the shear strain-rate,” Vol. 51, 2003, pp. 743–762.
14.
Fu
H. J.
,
DeVor
R. E.
,
Kapoor
S. G.
, “
A Mechanistic Model for the Prediction of the Force System in Face Milling Operations
,”
ASME J. Engr. for Ind.
, Vol.
106
, pp.
81
88
.
15.
Hsu
T. C.
, “
A Study of the Shear and Normal Stresses on a Cutting Tool
,”
Transactions of ASME, Journal of Engineering for Industry
,
1966
, Vol.
88
, pp.
51
54
.
16.
Kim
K. W.
,
Lee
W. Y.
, and
Sin
H. C.
, “
A Finite Element Analysis of Machining with the Tool Edge Considered
,”
J. of Materials Processing Technology
,
1999
, Vol.
86
, pp.
45
55
.
17.
Kita
Y.
,
Ido
M.
, and
Kawasaki
N.
, “
A Study of Metal Flow Ahead of Tool Face with Large Negative Rake Angle
,”
Transactions of ASME, Journal of Engineering for Industry
,
1982
, Vol.
104
, pp.
319
325
.
18.
Kline
W. A.
,
DeVor
R. E.
,
Shareef
I. A.
, “
The Prediction of Surface Accuracy in End Milling
,”
J. Eng. For Industry, Trans. ASME
, Vol.
104
,
1982
, pp.
272
278
.
19.
Komanduri
R.
, “
Some Aspects of Machining with Negative Rake Tools Simulating Grinding
,”
Int. Journal of Mach. Tool Des.
,
1971
, Vol.
11
, pp.
223
233
.
20.
Madhavan
V.
,
Chandrasekar
S.
, and
Farris
T. N.
, “
Machining as a Wedge Indentation
,”
Transactions of ASME, Journal of Applied Mechanics
,
2000
, Vol.
67
, pp.
128
139
.
21.
Manjunathaiah
J.
and
Endres
W. J.
, “
A New Model and Analysis of Orthogonal Machining with an Edge-Radiused Tool
,”
Transactions of ASME
, Aug
2000
, Vol.
122
, pp.
384
390
.
22.
Manjunathaiah, J. and W. J. Endres, “A Study of Apparent Negative Rake Angle and its Effects on Shear Angle during Orthogonal Cutting with Edge
23.
Movahheddy
M. R.
,
Altintas
Y.
,
Gadala
M. S.
, “
Numerical Analysis of Metal Cutting with Chamfered and Blunt Tools
,”
Transactions of ASME, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
,
2002
, Vol.
124
, pp.
178
188
.
24.
Nakayama
K.
and
Tamura
K.
, “
Size Effect in Metal Cutting Forces
,”
Transactions of ASME, Journal of Engineering for Industry
,
1968
, Vol.
90
, pp.
119
126
.
25.
Shatla
M.
,
Yen
Y. C.
, and
Altan
T.
, “
Tool-Workpiece Interface in Orthogonal Cutting — Application of FEM Modeling
,”
Transactions of NAMRI/SME
,
2000
, Vol.
28
, pp.
173
178
.
26.
Stephenson
D. A.
, and
Agapiou
J. S.
, “
Calculation of Main Cutting Edge Forces and Torque for Drills with Arbitrary Point Geometry
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tools and Manufacture
, Vol.
32
, No.
4
, pp.
521
538
.
27.
Thiele
J. D.
and
Melkote
S. N.
, “
Effect of Cutting Edge Geometry and Workpiece Hardness on Surface Generation in the Finish Hard Turning of AISI 52100 Steel
,”
Journal of Materials Processing Technology
,
1999
, Vol.
94
, pp.
216
226
.
28.
Thomsen
E. G.
,
Lapsley
J. T.
, and
Grassi
R. C.
, “
Deformation Work Absorbed by the Workpiece During Metal Cutting
,”
Transactions of ASME
,
1953
, Vol.
7
, pp.
591
603
.
29.
Waldorf
D. J.
,
DeVor
R. E.
,
Kapoor
S. G.
, “
A Slip-line Field for Ploughing During Orthogonal Cutting
,”
Transactions of ASME, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
,
1998
, Vol.
120
, pp.
693
699
.
30.
Waldorf
D. J.
, “
A Simplified Model for Ploughing Forces in Turning
,”
Transactions of NAMRI/SME
,
2004
, Vol.
32
, pp.
447
454
.
31.
Wu
D. W.
, “
Application of a Comprehensive Dynamic Cutting Force Model to Orthogonal Wave-generating Processes
,”
Int. J. Mech. Science
,
1988
, Vol.
30
. No.
8
, pp.
581
600
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.