High-speed milling offers an efficient tool for developing cost effective manufacturing processes with acceptable dimensional accuracy. Realization of these benefits depends on an appropriate selection of preferred operating conditions. In a previous study, optimization was used to find these conditions for two objectives: material removal rate (MRR) and surface location error (SLE), with a Pareto front or tradeoff curve found for the two competing objectives. However, confidence in the optimization results depends on the uncertainty in the input parameters to the milling model (time finite element analysis was applied here for simultaneous prediction of stability and surface location error). In this paper the uncertainty of these input parameters such as cutting force coefficients, tool modal parameters, and cutting parameters is evaluated. The sensitivity of the maximum stable axial depth, blim, to each input parameter at each spindle speed is determined. This enables identification of parameters with high contribution to stability lobe uncertainty. Two methods are used to calculate uncertainty: 1) Monte Carlo simulation; and 2) numerical derivatives of the system eigenvalues. Once the uncertainty in axial depth is calculated, its effect is observed in the MRR and SLE uncertainties. This allows robust optimization that takes into consideration both performance and uncertainty.

1.
Kurdi, M.H., Haftka, R.T., Schmitz, T.L., and Mann, B.P. Simultaneous Optimization of Removal Rate and Part Accuracy in High-Speed Milling in Proceedings of American Society of Mechanical Engineers International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, IMECE2004-60231, Anaheim, CA.
2.
Kline
W.
,
DeVor
R.
, and
Shareef
I.
,
1982
,
The prediction of surface accuracy in end milling
,
Journal of Engineering for Industry
,
104
:
272
278
.
3.
Tlusty, J., 1985, Effect of end milling deflections on accuracy, R.I. King, Ed., Handbook of High Speed Machining Technology, Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 140–153.
4.
Sutherland
J.
and
DeVor
R.
,
1986
,
An improved method for cutting force and surface error prediction in flexible end milling systems
,
Journal of Engineering for Industry
,
108
:
269
279
.
5.
Montgomery
D.
, and
Altintas
Y.
,
1991
,
Mechanism of cutting force and surface generation in dynamic milling
,
Journal of Engineering for Industry
,
113
/
2
:
160
168
.
6.
Smith
S.
and
Tlusty
J.
,
1991
,
An overview of modeling and simulation of the milling process
,
Journal of Engineering for Industry
,
113
/
2
:
169
175
.
7.
Schmitz
T.
and
Ziegert
J.
,
Examination of Surface Location Error Due to Phasing of Cutter Vibrations
.
Precision Engineering-Journal of the American Society for Precision Engineering
,
1999
.
23
(
1
):
51
51
.
8.
Guerra
R. E. H.
,
Schmitt-Braess
G.
,
Haber
R. H.
,
Alique
A.
, and
Alique
J. R.
,
Using Circle Criteria for Verifying Asymptotic Stability in Pl-Like Fuzzy Control Systems: Application to the Milling Process
.
Iee Proceedings-Control Theory and Applications
,
2003
.
150
(
6
): p.
619
619
.
9.
Kim
S. I.
,
Landers
R. G.
, and
Ulsoy
A. G.
,
Robust Machining Force Control with Process Compensation
.
Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering-Transactions of the Asme
,
2003
.
125
(
3
): p.
423
423
.
10.
Rober
S. J.
,
Shin
Y. C.
, and
Nwokah
O. D. I.
,
A Digital Robust Controller for Cutting Force Control in the End Milling Process
.
Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control-Transactions of the Asme
,
1997
.
119
(
2
): p.
146
146
.
11.
Pandit, S.M., Modal and Spectrum Analysis: Data Dependent Systems in State Space. 1991: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
12.
Mann, B.P., Bayly, P.V., Davies, M.A., and Halley, J.E., Limit Cycles, Bifurcations, and Accuracy of the Milling Process. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2004, in press.
13.
Insperger
T.
,
Mann
B. P.
,
Stepan
G.
, and
Bayly
P. V.
,
Stability of up-Milling and Down-Milling, Part1: Alternative Analytical Methods
.
International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture
,
2003
.
43
:
25
25
.
14.
Mann, B.P., Dynamics of Milling Process. 2003, Ph.D Dissertation, St. Louis, MO: Washington University.
15.
International Organization for Standardization, Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. 1995.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.