The concept of virtual assembly offers endless possibilities to a designer in a manufacturing setting. Various assembly measures such as clearance, assembly planning, force and alternate designs can be examined without the need to waste resources through manufacturing. This paper investigates the possibility of using force feedback through haptics in a virtual environment as a way of understanding the intricacy of simple assembly. This allows a designer to further understand what will, and will not, work during the design phase. The study of certain characteristics, including lubrication, is also examined to see what impact it has on the ease of assembly. A user, or designer, can then get an actual feel to see what characteristics change the likelihood for a proper fit. In addition, the creation of a virtual part run is also examined to fully understand what constitutes a defect. Statistical output is provided so a user can analyze a run of parts for quality control and be able to pinpoint possible causes for error in a process. Virtual parts can then be assembled from the run to see how each differs from the others and to emphasize the undesirability of a defect for assembly purposes.

Volume Subject Area:
Materials Handling Engineering
Keywords:
Virtual Reality, Assembly, Haptics, Manufacturing, Quality Control
Topics:
Haptics, Manufacturing, Quality control, Virtual assembly, Virtual reality
1.
Zhang, Y., Murray, N. and Fernanado, T., 2003. “3D Auditory Feedback Acts as Task Aid in a Virtual Assembly Environment,” IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation, Kobe, Japan.
2.
Griesmeyer, J.M. and Oppel, F.J., 1996. “Process Subsystem Architecture for Virtual Manufacturing Validation,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
3.
Zachmann, G. and Rettig, A., “Natural and Robust Interaction in Virtual Assembly Simulation,” Eighth ISPE International Conference on Concurrent Engineering, Anaheim, CA, USA.
4.
Banerjee
A.
,
Banerjee
P.
,
Ye
N.
, and
Dech
F.
,
1999
. “
Assembly Planning Effectiveness Using Virtual Reality
,”
Presence
,
8
, pp.
204
–
217
.
5.
Jayaram
S.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Jayaram
U.
, and
Tirumali
H.
,
1999
. “
VADE: A Virtual Assembly Design Environment
,”
IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications
,
19
, pp.
44
–
50
.
6.
Gupta
R.
,
Sheridan
T.
,
Whitney
D.
,
1997
. “
Experiments Using Multimodal Virtual Environments in Design for Assembly Analysis
,”
Presence
,
6
, pp.
318
–
338
.
7.
Adams, R.J., Klowden, D., and Hannaford, B., 2001. “Virtual Training for a Manual Assembly Task,” Haptics-e: The Electronic Journal of Haptics Research. 2.
8.
Unger, B.J. et al., 2001. “Comparison of 3-D Haptic Peg-in-Hole Tasks in Real and Virtual Environments,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Maui, Hawaii, USA.
9.
Petzold
B.
 et al.,
2004
. “
A Study on Visual, Auditory, and Haptic Feedback for Assembly Tasks
,”
Presence
,
13
, pp.
16
–
21
.
10.
Tsuruoka, T., Fujioka, H., Moriyama, T., and Mayeda, H., 1997. “3D Analysis of Contact in Peg-Hole Insertion,” IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning, Marina del Rey, CA, USA.
11.
Whitney, D.E., 2004. Mechanical Assemblies: Their Design, Manufacture, and Role in Product Development. Oxford University Press, New York.
12.
Seireg, A.A., 1998. Friction and Lubrication in Mechanical Design. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.
13.
Montgomery, D.C., 2001. Introduction to Statistical Quality Control. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
14.
Hudson, T.C., Lin, M.C., Cohen, J., Gottschalk, S. and Manocha, D., 1997. “V-COLLIDE: Accelerated Collision Detection for VRML,” VRML 97, Monterey, CA, USA.
15.
Hubbard
P. M.
,
1995
. “
Collision Detection for Interactive Graphics Applications
,”
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
.
1
, pp.
218
–
230
.
16.
Kim, H.S., Ko, H., Lee, K., and Lee, C.-w., 1995. “A Collision Detection Method for Real Time Assembly Simulation,” IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
17.
Coutee, A.S., and Bras, B., 2004. “A Comparison of Two Collision Detection Libraries in a Haptic Simulation Environment,” ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
18.
Kim
C. E.
and
Vance
J. M.
,
2004
. “
Collision Detection and Part Interaction Modeling to Facilitate Immersive Virtual Assembly Methods
,”
Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering
,
4
, pp.
83
–
90
.
19.
Luciano, C., DeFanti, T., Banerjee, P., and Mehrotra, S., 2004. “Realistic Cross-Platform Haptic Applications Using Freely-Available Libraries,” 12th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, in conjunction with IEEE Virtual Reality 2004, Chicago, IL, USA.
20.
van den Bergen, G., 2004. Collision Detection in Interactive 3D Environments. The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Interactive 3D Technology. Elsevier, Morgan Kaufmann, New York.
21.
Sturges
R. H. J.
,
1988
. “
A Three-Dimensional Assembly Task Quantification with Application to Machine Dexterity
,”
The International Journal of Robotics Research
,
7
, pp.
34
–
78
.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 2005
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.