This paper discusses a methodology for improving hunting behavior in rail vehicles by semiactive control of suspension elements. This methodology focuses on increasing the critical velocity of hunting beyond the operational speed range. Earlier studies have shown that the critical velocity is most sensitive to the primary longitudinal stiffness, KPX. A higher primary longitudinal stiffness can significantly increase the critical hunting velocity of the rail vehicle. But, having high values of KPX is largely undesirable, since that would make the wheelset suspension very rigid. Any disturbance to the wheels due to imperfections in the rails will result in a forcing function in the equations of motion, thereby facilitating the transfer of the recurrent wheelset oscillations to the car body, leading to a poorer ride quality. As an alternative to using sustained high values of KPX throughout the ride, a semiactive approach has been attempted, whereby, a nominal value of KPX was assumed for the majority of the simulation time. On a need basis, this value was made to increase for limited portions of the oscillatory cycle. As an initial approach, the value of KPX was made to be a function of the wheelset lateral excursion. A moderate value of KPX was assumed for the duration of time that the wheelset lateral excursions were below a preset threshold value. Whenever the lateral displacement exceeded this threshold limit, the value of KPX was increased to 10 times the original value. It was thought that this approach would raise the critical hunting velocity, and drive the oscillations down towards the center. But simulation showed that this strategy barely improved the critical velocity. A subsequent approach was to make the value of KPX a function of the wheelset yaw displacement instead. This approach yielded a significant improvement in the critical velocity.

1.
DePater, A.D., 1960, “The Approximate Determination of the Hunting Movement of a Railway Vehicle by aid of the Method of Krylov and Bogoljubow,” Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Applied Mechanics, Stresa, Appl. Sci. Res. A. 10.
2.
Wickens
A. H.
,
1965
, “
The Dynamic Stability of Railway Vehicle Wheelsets and Bogies having Profiled Wheels
,”
International Journal of Solids and Structures
1
(
3
), pp.
319
341
.
3.
Cooperrider
N. K.
,
1972
, “
The Hunting Behavior of Conventional Railway Trucks
,”
ASME Journal of Eng. Industry
94
, pp.
752
762
.
4.
Huilgol
R. R.
, “
Hopf-Friedrichs Bifurcation and the Hunting of a Railway Axle
,”
Quart. J. Appl. Math.
,
36
, pp.
85
94
.
5.
Kaas-Peterson
C.
, “
Chaos in a Railway Bogie
,”
Acta Mech.
,
61
, pp.
89
107
.
6.
True
H.
,
1993
, “
Dynamics of a Rolling Wheelset
,”
Applied Mechanics Reviews
,
46
(
7
), pp.
438
444
.
7.
True, H., 1989, “Chaotic Motion of Railway Vehicles,” 11th IAVSD symposium on Vehicle System Dynamics in the Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and Tracks, Amsterdam/Lisse, pp. 578–587.
8.
True, H. and Kaas-Peterson, C., 1984, “A Bifurcation Analysis of Nonlinear Oscillations in Railway Vehicles,” 8th IAVSD symposium on Vehicle System Dynamics in the Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and Tracks, pp. 655–665.
9.
Kaas-Peterson, C. and True, H., 1985, “Periodic, Biperiodic, and Chaotic Dynamical Behavior of Railway Vehicles,” 9th IAVSD symposium on Vehicle System Dynamics in the Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and Tracks, pp. 208–221.
10.
Vermeulen
P. J.
and
Johnson
K. L.
,
1964
, “
Contact of Nonspherical Elastic Bodies Transmitting Tangential Forces
,”
Journal of Applied Mechanics
,
86
, pp.
338
340
.
11.
Knudsen
C.
,
Feldberg
R.
, and
Jaschinski
A.
,
1991
, “
Non-Linear Dynamic Phenomena in the Behavior of a Railway Wheelset Model
,”
Nonlinear Dynamics
,
2
, pp.
389
404
.
12.
Knudsen
C.
,
Slivsgaard
E.
,
Rose
M.
,
True
H.
, and
Feldberg
R.
,
1994
, “
Dynamics of a Model of a Railway Wheelset
.”
Nonlinear Dynamics
,
6
, pp.
215
236
.
13.
Law
E. H.
and
Brand
R. S.
,
1973
, “
Analysis of the Nonlinear Dynamics of a Railway Vehicle Wheelset
,”
Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control
,
G 95
, pp.
28
35
.
14.
Scheffel
H.
,
1979
, “
The Influence of the Suspension on the Hunting Stability of Railway Vehicles
,”
Rail International
10
(
8
), pp.
662
696
.
15.
Ahmadian
M.
and
Yang
S.
,
1998
, “
Hopf Bifurcation and Hunting Behavior in a Rail Wheelset with Flange Contact
,”
Nonlinear Dynamics
15
(
1
), pp.
15
30
.
16.
Ahmadian
M.
and
Yang
S.
,
1997
, “
Effect of Suspension Nonlinearities on Rail Vehicle Bifurcation and Stability
,”
ASME Rail Transportation
13
, pp.
97
106
.
17.
Yang
S.
and
Ahmadian
M.
,
1996
, “
The Hopf Bifurcation in a Rail Wheelset with Nonlinear Damping
,”
ASME Rail Transportation
12
, pp.
113
119
.
18.
Horak
D.
and
Wormley
D. N.
,
1982
, “
Nonlinear Stability and Tracking of Rail Passenger Trucks
,”
Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control
104
, pp.
256
263
.
19.
Nagurka, M.L., 1983, “Curving Performance of Rail Passenger Vehicles,” Ph.D. thesis, M.I.T., Cambridge, MA.
20.
Mohan, A. and Ahmadian, M., 2004, “Nonlinear Investigation of the Effect of Primary Suspension on the Hunting Stability of a Rail Wheelset,” Proceedings of the 2004 ASME/IEEE Joint Rail Conference, Baltimore, MD, April 6–8, 27, pp. 53–61.
21.
Mohan, A. and Ahmadian, M., 2005, “Nonlinear Investigation of the Effect of Suspension Parameters on the Hunting Stability of a Railway Truck,” Proceedings of the 2005 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Orlando, FL, November, 5–11
22.
Mohan, A., 2003, “Nonlinear Investigation of the Use of Controllable Primary Suspensions to Improve Hunting in Railway Vehicles,” M.S. Thesis, Virginia Tech, VA.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.