The feasibility of generating mono-disperse micro-bubbles by electrolysis in tap water using micro-fabricated devices was investigated towards the development of a high-density bubbler matrix. The effect of electrode geometry and size, as well as artificial nucleation sites was tested using single and arrays of electrode pairs. The results indicated that circular electrode node shapes (as opposed to triangular or square nodes) nucleated bubbles from the node center and exhibited fewer instances of bubble coalescence and a higher bubble detachment frequency when operated with small anode-anode and cathode-cathode spacings. Artificial nucleation sites, produced by etching the surface of the electrodes, were shown to be able to limit nucleation to one site (though in some cases, bubbles formed underneath the dielectric layer) as well as increase current efficiency. A device with thousands of electrode pairs (a matrix of nodes) was also fabricated in order to generate a bubble cloud close to the channel wall. At a flow speed of 14 cm/s, this device demonstrated the ability to generate a bubble cloud reasonably close to the wall 20 mm from the trailing edge of the matrix of nodes, with the void fraction peaking at 1 mm from the channel wall and returning to zero at 3 mm. It yielded efficiencies greater than similar thin-wire devices, but spurious bubbles formed on the device, indicating that additional work is needed to develop this technology in a matrix format.

1.
Brandon
N. P.
and
Kelsall
G. H.
, (
1985
) “
Growth Kinetics of Bubbles Electrogenerated at Microelectrodes
,”
Journal of Applied Electrochemistry
, Vol.
15
, pp.
475
484
.
2.
Brown, D.A., (1990) “Attempts to Achieve Drag Reduction via Electrochemically produced Micro-bubbles,” Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium of Performance Enhancement for Marine Applications, University of Rhode Island, October 14–16, 1990.
3.
Choi, B.K., Ma, M., White, C., and Liu, C., (1999) “Electrolytic and Thermal Bubble Generation Using AC Inductive Powering,” International Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators, Transducer’99, Sendai, Japan.
4.
Hugi, C. and Mueller, A., (1993) “A Camera for Measuring Density, Size and Velocity of Rising Air Bubbles and Water Velocity in a Bubble Plume,” In Flow Visualization and Image Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 189–205.
5.
Janssen
L. J. J.
,
Sillen
C. W. M. P.
,
Barendrecht
E.
, and
van Stralen
S. J. D.
, (
1984
) “
Bubble Behavior During Oxygen and Hydrogen Evolution at Transparent Electrodes in KOH Solution
,”
Electrochimica Acta
, Vol.
29
, No.
5
, pp.
633
642
.
6.
Kawamura, T., Moriguchi, Y., Kato, H., Kakugawa, A., and Kodama, Y., (2003) “Effect of Bubble Size on the Microbubble Drag Reduction of a Turbulent Boundary Layer,” 4th ASME-JSME Joint Fluids Engineering Conference, Honolulu, HI, July 6–10, 2003.
7.
Lee, S., (2003) “Electrolytic Microbubble Injection in a Water Channel,” M.S. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Il.
8.
Lee, S., Sutomo, W., Liu, C., and Loth, E., (2003) “MEMSbased Electrolytical Microbubbler in a Water Channel,” 4th ASME/JSME Fluids Engineering Conference, Honolulu HA, July, FEDSM2003-45646.
9.
Loth
E.
, (
2000
) “
Numerical Approaches to Dilute Two-Phase Flow
,”
Progress in Energy and Combustion Science
Vol.
26
, No.
3
June, pp.
161
223
.
10.
McCormick
M. E.
, and
Bhattacharya
R.
, (
1973
) “
Drag Reduction of a Submersible Hull by Electrolysis
,”
Naval Engineering Journal
, Vol.
85
, pp.
11
16
.
11.
Merkle, C. and Deutsch, S., (1992) “Microbubble Drag Deduction in Liquid Turbulent Boundary Layers,” Applied Mechanics Reviews, Vol 45, No. 3, Part1, ASME Book No. AMR 105.
12.
Pal
S.
,
Merkle
C. L.
, and
Deutsch
S.
, (
1988
) “
Bubble Characteristics in a Microbubble boundary layer
,”
Physics of Fluids
, Vol.
31
, pp.
774
751
.
13.
Rightley
P.
and
Lasheras
J.
, (
2000
) “
Bubble dispersion and interphase coupling in a free-shear flow
,”
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
, Vol.
412
, pp.
21
59
.
14.
Volanschi
A.
,
Oudejans
D.
,
Olthuis
W.
, and
Bergveld
P.
, (
1996
) “
Gas Phase Nucleation Core Electrodes for the Electrolytical Method of Measuring the Dynamic Surface Tension in Aqueous Solutions
,”
Sensors and Actuators B
, Vol.
35–36
, pp.
73
79
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.