A moving-deforming grid study was carried out using a commercial CFD solver, Fluent® 6.2.16, in order to quantify the level of mixing of a lower viscosity additive (at a mass concentration below 10%) into a higher viscosity process fluid for a large-scale metering gear pump configuration typical in plastics manufacturing. Second order upwinding and bounded central differencing schemes were used to reduce numerical diffusion. A maximum solver progression rate of 0.0003 revolutions per timestep was required for an accurate solution. Fluid properties, additive feed arrangement, pump scale, and pump speed were systematically studied for their effects on mixing. For each additive feed arrangement studied, the additive was fed in individual stream(s) into the pump intake. Pump intake additive variability, in terms of coefficient of variation (COV), was > 300% for all cases. The model indicated that the pump discharge additive COV ranged from 32% for a single centerline additive feed stream to 3.9% for multiple additive feed streams. It was found that viscous heating and thermal/shear-thinning characteristics in the process fluid slightly improved mixing, reducing the outlet COV to 2.3% for the multiple feed stream case. The outlet COV fell to 1.4% for a half-scale arrangement with similar physics. Lastly, it was found that if the smaller unit’s speed were halved, the outlet COV was reduced to 1.1%.

1.
Kramer, W., 1988, “Gear Pump Characteristics and Application,” Plastics South–Conference Proceedings of SPE, pp. 91–110.
2.
Bouse
L. F.
,
Carlton
J. B.
, and
Jank
P. C.
,
1988
, “
Effect of Water Soluble Polymers on Spray Droplet Size
,”
Transactions of the ASAE
,
31
(
6
), pp.
1633
1648
.
3.
Valsamis, L. N. and Pereira, J. M., 1999, “Rotor Developments in the Farrel Continuous Mixers Post Reactor Processing of Bimodal HDPE Resins,” Proceedings of the 1999 International Conference on POLYOLEFINS XI.
4.
Bruce, D., Wilson, M., and Generalis, S., 1997, “Flow Field Analysis of Both the Trilobal Element and Mixing Disc Zones within a Closely Intermeshing, Co-Rotating Twin-Screw Extruder,” Intern. Polymer Processing XII, 4, pp. 323–330.
5.
Panton, R. L., 1996, “Incompressible Flow,” 2nd Ed., Wiley & Sons.
6.
Siginer
D. A.
and
Letelier
M. F.
,
2002
, “
Pulsating Flow Flow of Viscoelastic Fluids in Straight Tubes of Arbitrary Cross-Section - Part II: Secondary Flows
,”
International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics
,
37
, pp.
395
407
.
7.
Bird, R. B., Steward, W. E., and Lightfoot, E. N., 1960, “Transport Phenomena,” John Wiley & Sons.
8.
Strasser, W. S., Feldman, G. M., Wilkins, F. C., and Leylek, J. H., 2004, “Transonic Passage Turbine Blade Tip Clearance with Scalloped Shroud: Part II - Losses with and without Scrubbing Effects in Engine Configuration,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2004-59116.
9.
Patankar, S. V., Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, Taylor & Francis, 1980.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.