Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) currently has nearly 5.0 MWdc of utility-scale grid-connected photovoltaic (PV) systems that have been installed in its service territory since 2000. Most of this installed PV capacity is in support of the Arizona Corporation Commission Environmental Portfolio Standard (EPS) goal that encourages TEP to generate 1.1% of its energy generation through renewable resources by 2007, with 60% of that amount from photovoltaics. The EPS program provides for multi-year, pay-as-you-go development of renewable energy, with kWhac energy production as a key program measurement. A total of 26 crystalline silicon collector systems, each rated at 135 kWdc, have been installed at the Springerville, AZ generating plant by TEP making this one of the largest PV plants in the world. These systems were installed in a standardized, cookie-cutter approach whereby each uses the same array field design, mounting hardware, electrical interconnection, and inverter unit. This approach has allowed TEP to achieve a total installed system cost of $5.40/Wdc and a TEP-calculated levelized energy cost of $0.10/kWhac for PV electrical generation. During this time, much has been learned regarding performance, cost, maintenance, installation and design. This paper presents an assessment of these topics and a perspective associated with this PV experience.

Volume Subject Area:
Solar Energy
Topics:
Electricity (Physics), Photovoltaic power systems, Design, Energy generation, Electric power generation, Hardware, Maintenance, Photovoltaics, Power stations, Renewable energy, Silicon
1.
Environmental Portfolio Standard R14–2-1618, Arizona Corporation Commission, Phoenix, AZ, www.cc.state.az.us/utility/electric/R14-2–1618.
2.
Moore, L., Post, H., Hayden, H., Canada, S., Narang, D., “Photovoltaic Power Plant Experience at Arizona Public Service - A 5-Year Assessment,” Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 2005 (early view at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jissue/82003028)
3.
www.tuesonelectric.com
4.
Tucson Electric Power Company, “Demand-Side Management and Renewables Data for Mid-Year 2004,” semi-annual report to the Arizona Corporation Commission http://www.greenwatts.com/Docs/ACCMidYear04.pdf
5.
Hansen, T., “The Systems Driven Approach to Solar Energy: A Real World Experience,” Proceedings of Solar Energy Systems Symposium, Albuquerque, NM, October 15–17, 2003, www.sandia.gov/pv
6.
IEC, “Photovoltaic System Performance Monitoring– Guidelines for Measurement, Data Exchange, and Analysis, IEC Standard 61724,” Geneva, Switzerland, 1998.
7.
Marion, B. et. al., “Performance Parameters for Grid-Connected PV Systems,” Proceedings of 31st IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Lake Buena Vista, FL, January 3–7, 2005.
8.
Thomas
 
M.
,
Post
 
H.
,
DeBlasio
 
R.
, “
Photovoltaic Systems: An End-of-Millennium Review
,”
Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications
1999
;
7
:
1
–
19
9.
Moore, L., “Sandia’s PV Reliability Database: Helping Business do Business,” Quarterly Highlights of Sandia ’s Solar Programs, Vol. 1, 2001, www.sandia.gov/pv
10.
SEIA, “Our Solar Power Future: The U.S. Photovoltaics Industry Roadmap Through 2030 and Beyond,” January 2005, www.seia.org
11.
Little
 
R.
,
Nowlan
 
M.
, “
Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaics: The Hurdle for Thin Films
,”
Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications
1997
;
5
:
309
–
315
.
12.
Mitchell, R., Witt, C., King, R., Ruby, D., “PVMaT Advances in the Photovoltaic Industry and the Focus of Future Photovoltaic Manufacturing R&D,” Proceedings of 29th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2002, 1444–1447.
13.
Mason, J., “Life Cycle Analysis of a Field Grid-Connected, Multi-Crystalline PV Plant: A Case Study of Tucson Electric Power’s Springerville PV Plant,” Solar Hydrogen Education Project, Farmingdale, NY, November 5, 2004.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 2005
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.