The multiple parameters that are involved in the design of anisotropic conductive adhesive (ACA) assemblies, and the overlapping influences that they have on the final electrical contact resistance, represent a difficult challenge for the designers. The most conflicting parameters include initial bonding force F, number of particles N, adhesion strength GA, and modulus of elasticity E of the cured resin. It is well known that as the bonding force increases, the contact resistance decreases. However, when the bonding force reaches a certain maximum value, the contact between conductive particle and conductive track is disrupted due to delamination of the cured resin during the elastic recovery. The authors have shown in previous studies that the delamination is caused by high residual stresses and that it depends largely on the adhesion strength of the assembly and on the modulus of elasticity of the cured resin. Additionally, the authors have provided a methodology to quantify the maximum threshold value of the bonding force for different numbers of particles trapped between mating conductive tracks. In this paper, the relationships between contact resistance R and each one of these conflicting parameters are systematically combined to create design diagrams that give regions of robust design. It is found, for example, that for particles of radius 5μm, E = 0.9 GPa, GA = 50 J/m2, and 2 ≤ N ≤ 5, the required bonding force to achieve contact resistance within the range 7 < R < 40 mω, is 2.5 < F < 20mN.

1.
Lau, J., 1996, Flip Chip Technologies. New York: McGraw-Hill.
2.
Liu, J., 1999, Conductive Adhesives for Electronics Packaging. London, U.K.: Electrochemical Publications Ltd.
3.
Chin
M.
,
Iyer
K.
, and
Hu
S. J.
,
2004
, “
Prediction of electrical contact resistance for anisotropic conductive adhesive assemblies
,”
IEEE Trans. Comp. Packag. Technol.
,
27
, no.
2
, pp.
317
326
.
4.
Yim
M. J.
and
Paik
K. W.
,
1998
, “
Design and understanding of anisotropic conductive adhesive (ACF’s) for LCD packaging
,”
IEEE Trans. Comp., Packag., Manufact. Technol. A
,
21
, no.
2
, pp.
226
234
.
5.
Hu
K. X.
,
Yeh
C. P.
, and
Wyatt
K. W.
,
1997
, “
Electrothermo-mechanical responses of conductive adhesive materials
,”
IEEE Trans. Comp., Packag., Manufact. Technol. A
,
20
, no.
4
, pp.
470
477
.
6.
Fu
Y.
,
Willander
M.
, and
Liu
J.
,
2001
, “
Statistics of electric conductance through anisotropically conductive adhesive
,”
IEEE Trans. Comp. Packag. Technol.
,
24
, no.
2
, pp.
250
255
.
7.
Chin, M., Barber, J. R., and Hu, S. J., “Effect of elastic recovery on the electric contact resistance in anisotropic conductive adhesive assemblies,” accepted for publication in IEEE Trans. Comp. Packag. Technol.
8.
Chin, M. and Hu, S. J., “A multiple particle model for the prediction of electrical contact resistance in anisotropic conductive adhesive assemblies,” submitted to IEEE Trans. Comp. Packag. Technol.
9.
Williams
D. J.
and
Whalley
D. C.
,
1993
, “
The effects of conducting particle distribution on the behavior of anisotropic conductive adhesives: non-uniform conductivity and shorting between connections
,”
Journal of Electronics Manufacturing
,
3
, pp.
85
94
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.