Lean NOx Traps (LNTs) have shown promise for Diesel applications; however, production implementation in vehicles poses a number of challenges. Much of the literature reports on LNT systems in which the catalyst always receives the full flow of exhaust from the engine, referred here as full-flow regeneration systems. Another implementation of the LNT is one in which the exhaust can be partially or fully diverted from the catalyst to allow local introduction of the necessary reductants for regeneration. The physical aspects of one such system, as well as a control-oriented model are presented with experimental validation. In the system described here, the exhaust flow is diverted around the catalyst during regenerations. In the low exhaust flow through the catalyst, reductant is added (Diesel fuel typically) which provides the rich conditions for regenerating the trap. This allows the engine to continue to run in normal lean mode, which overcomes one of the major challenges for full-flow regeneration systems. Successful regeneration with liquid Diesel fuel is strongly dependent on catalyst temperature, which is addressed by proper thermal management of the system through the addition of fuel prior to regeneration. In this paper, both component level and vehicle level simulations are presented in terms of fuel economy versus NOx reduction. Several different system configurations and control strategies are compared.

1.
Tomzaic, D., Tatur, M., Thorton, M., 2004, “Development of a Diesel Passenger Car Meeting Tier 2 Emissions Levels,” Society of Automotive Engineers Paper No. 2004-01-0581.
2.
Tatur, M., Tyrer, H., Tomzaic, D., Thorton, M., McDonald, J., 2005, “Tier 2 Intermediate Useful Life (50,000 Miles) and 4000 Mile Supplemental Federal Test Procedure (SFTP) Exhaust Emissions for a NOx Adsorber and Diesel Particulate Filter Equipped Light-Duty Vehicle,” Society of Automotive Engineers Paper No. 2004-01-0581.
3.
Tomzaic, D., Tatur, M., 2003, “APBF-DEC Light-Duty NOx Adsorber/DPF Project,” Diesel Engine Emissions Conference Presentation, Newport, RI.
4.
Webb, C., Weber, P., Thornton, M., 2004, “Achieving Tier 2 Bin 5 Emission Levels with a Medium Duty Diesel Pick-Up and a NOX Adsorber, Diesel Particulate Emissions System - Exhaust Gas Temperature Measurement,” Society of Automotive Engineers Paper No. 2004-01-0584.
5.
Webb, C., Weber, P., Thornton, M., 2004, “Achieving Tier 2 Bin 5 Emission Levels with a Medium Duty Diesel Pick-Up and a NOX Adsorber, Diesel Particulate Emissions System - NOX Adsorber Management,” Society of Automotive Engineers Paper No. 2004-01-0585.
6.
Kim, Y., J. Sun, I. Kolmanovsky, J. Koncsol. (2003). “A Phenomenological Control Oriented Lean NOx Trap Model,” Society of Automotive Engineers Paper No. 2003-01-1164
7.
Ketfi-Cherif, A., D. Vissel, S. Beurthey, M. Sorinem., 2000, “Modeling and control of a NOx trap catalyst,” Society of Automotive Engineers Paper No. 2000-01-1199.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.