In recent times, there has been considerable interest in creating and deploying modular cooperating collectives of robots. Interest in such cooperative systems typically arises when certain tasks are either too complex to be performed by a single agent or when there are distinct benefits that accrue by cooperation of many simple robotic modules. However, the nature of the both the individual modules as well as their interactions can affect the overall system performance. In this paper, we examine this aspect in the context of cooperative payload transport by robot collectives wherein the physical nature of the interactions between the various modules creates a tight coupling within the system. We leverage the rich theoretical background of analysis of constrained mechanical systems to provide a systematic framework for formulation and evaluation of system-level performance on the basis of the individual-module characteristics. The composite multi-d.o.f wheeled vehicle, formed by supporting a common payload on the end-effectors of multiple individual mobile manipulator modules, is treated as an in-parallel system with articulated serial-chain arms. The system-level model, constructed from the twist- and wrench-based models of the attached serial chains, can then be systematically analyzed for performance (in terms of mobility and disturbance rejection.) A 2-module composite system example is used through the paper to highlight various aspects of the systematic system model formulation, effects of selection of the actuation at the articulations (active, passive or locked) on system performance and experimental validation on a hardware prototype test bed.

1.
Borenstein, J., Everett, B., and Feng, L., 1996, Navigating Mobile Robots: Systems and Techniques. A. K. Peters, Ltd., Wellesley, MA.
2.
Borenstein
J.
,
Everett
H. R.
,
Feng
L.
, and
Wehe
D.
,
1997
, “
Mobile Robot Positioning: Sensors and Techniques
,” Special Issue on Mobile Robots,
Journal of Robotic Systems
,
14
, pp.
231
249
.
3.
Abou-Samah, M., 2001, “A Kinematically Compatible Framework for Collaboration of Multiple Non-Holonomic Wheeled Mobile Robots,” M. Eng., McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
4.
Abou-Samah, M. and Krovi, V., 2002, “Optimal Configuration Selection for a Cooperating System of Mobile Manipulators,” Proc., 2002 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Montreal, QC, Canada.
5.
Robot Colonies, vol. 4(5). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
6.
Cao
Y.
,
Fukunaga
A. S.
, and
Kahng
A. B.
,
1997
, “
Cooperative Mobile Robotics: Antecedents and Directions
,”
Autonomous Robots
,
4
, pp.
7
27
.
7.
Koivo
A. J.
and
Bekey
G. A.
,
1988
, “
Report of Workshop on Coordinated Multiple Robot Manipulators: Planning, Control, and Application
,”
IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation
,
4
, pp.
91
93
.
8.
Kerr
J.
and
Roth
B.
,
1986
, “
Analysis of Multifingered Hands
,”
The International Journal of Robotics Research
,
4
, pp.
3
17
.
9.
Salisbury
J. K.
and
Craig
J. J.
,
1982
, “
Articulated Hands: Force Control and Kinematic Issues
,”
The International Journal of Robotics Research
,
1
, pp.
4
17
.
10.
Kumar
V.
and
Waldron
K. J.
, “
Force Distribution in Closed Kinematic Chains
,”
IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation
,
4
, pp.
657
664
.
11.
Song, S. M. and Waldron, K. J., 1989, Machines That Walk. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
12.
Khatib, O., Yokoi, K., Chang, K., Ruspini, D., Holmberg, R., and Casal, A., 1996, “Vehicle/Arm Coordination and Multiple Mobile Manipulator Decentralized Cooperation,” Proc., 1996 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.
13.
Desai
J.
and
Kumar
V.
,
1999
, “
Motion Planning for Cooperating Mobile Manipulators
,”
Journal of Robotic Systems
,
10
, pp.
557
579
.
14.
Tanner
H. G.
,
Kyriakopoulos
K. J.
, and
Krikelis
N. I.
,
1998
, “
Modeling of Multiple Mobile Manipulators Handling a Common Deformable Object
,”
Journal of Robotic Systems
,
15
, pp.
599
623
.
15.
Kosuge, K., Osumi, T., Sato, M., Chiba, K., and Takeo, K., 1998, “Transportation of a Single Object by Two Decentralized-Controlled Nonholonomic Mobile Robots,” Proc., 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Leuven, Belgium.
16.
Yamakita, M. and Suh, J.-H., 2001, “Adaptive Generation of Desired Velocity Field for Leader-Follower Type Cooperative Mobile Robots with Decentralized Pvfc,” Proc., 2001 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.
17.
Krishnaprasad, P. S. and Tsakiris, D. P., 1995, “Oscillations Se(2)-Snakes and Motion Control,” Proc., 34th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, New Orleans LA.
18.
Ostrowski, J. P., 1995, “The Mechanics and Control of Undulatory Robotic Locomotion,” California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA.
19.
Campion
G.
,
Bastin
G.
, and
D’Andrea-Novel
B.
,
1996
, “
Structural Properties and Classification of Kinematic and Dynamic Models of Wheeled Mobile Robots
,”
IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation
,
12
, pp.
47
62
.
20.
Pin
F. G.
and
Killough
M.
,
1994
, “
A New Family of Omnidirectional and Holonomic Wheeled Plaforms for Mobile Robots
,”
IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation
,
10
, pp.
480
489
.
21.
Reister
D. B.
and
Unseren
M. A.
,
1993
, “
Position and Contraint Force Control of a Vehicle with Two or More Steerable Drive Wheels
,”
IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation
,
9
, pp.
723
731
.
22.
Sreenivasan
S. V.
and
Wa-ldron
K. J.
,
1996
, “
Displacement Analysis of an Actively Articulated Wheeled Vehicle Configuration with Extensions to Motion Planning on Uneven Terrain
,”
ASME Journal of Mechanical Design
,
118
, pp.
312
317
.
23.
Murray, R., Li, Z., and Sastry, S., 1993, A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation. CRC Press LLC, Florida.
24.
Bhatt, R. M., 2003, “Formation Motion Planning for Payload Transport by Modular Wheeled Mobile Manipulators,” M.S., State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo.
25.
Tang, C. P., 2004, “Manipulability-Based Analysis of Cooperative Payload Transport by Robot Collectives,” M.S., University at Buffalo, Buffalo NY.
26.
Tang, C. P., Bhatt, R. M., and Krovi, V., 2004, “Decentralized Kinematic Control of Payload Transport by a System of Mobile Manipulators,” Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, New Orleans, LA.
27.
Bruyninckx, H. and Schutter, J. D., 1988, “Unified Kinetostatics for Serial, Parallel and Mobile Robots,” Proceedings of 6th International Symposium on Advances in Robot Kinematics, Strobl, Austria.
28.
Waldron
K. J.
and
Hunt
K. H.
,
1991
, “
Series-Parallel Dualities in Actively Coordinated Mechanisms
,”
Int. J. Robotics Research
,
10
, pp.
473
480
.
29.
Firmani
F.
and
Podhorodeski
R. P.
,
2004
, “
Force-Unconstrained Poses for a Redundantly-Actuated Planar Parallel Manipulator
,”
Mechanism and Machine Theory
,
39
, pp.
459
476
.
30.
Gosselin
C.
and
Angeles
J.
,
1990
, “
Singularity Analysis of Closed Loop Kinematic Chains
,”
IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation
,
6
, pp.
281
290
.
31.
Cooperative Payload Transport by Robot Collectives, 2005, available at: http://mechatronics.eng.buffalo.edu/research/mobilemanipulator/index.html.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.