In this paper, we consider the problem of designing a multiscale control for plants with conflicting time-domain performance requirements. These results follow from the conventional optimal proportional-integral (PI) control. Four different design methods are proposed: (1) a controller-switch technique which makes use of employing two different controllers designed to meet two different performances and are switched during the course of operation, (2) an integral-reset scheme, which resets the integral term in the control law when the new reference point is reached, (3) controller-switch and integral-reset schemes put together to take benefits of both of them, (4) a model-following approach that uses a dynamic reference model without increasing the overall dimension of the system. The objective of the last scheme is to make the output of the plant track the output of the model as closely as possible. Stability analyses and a comparison between the performances of these methods are given. All these methods give better performances as compared with conventional control schemes. Block diagrams are given and step responses are obtained to demonstrate the proposed methods. A six degrees-of-freedom (DOFs) magnetically levitated (maglev) stage with a second-order pure-mass model has been used to demonstrate the capabilities of the aforementioned control strategies. These strategies are not plant-specific and may be generalized to any higher-order plant.

1.
Yeh
H.-C.
,
Ni
W.-T.
, and
Pan
S.-S.
, “
Digital closed-loop nanopositioining using rectilinear flexure stage and laser interferomtry
,”
Control Engineering Practice
, vol.
13
, no.
5
, pp.
559
566
, May
2005
.
2.
H. Shakir and W-J. Kim, “Nanoscale path planning and motion control,” Proc. 2005 American Control Conference, Portland, OR, June 2005.
3.
G. Deodhare and M. Vidyasagar, “Design of non-overshooting feedback control systems,” Proc. 29th Conf on Decision and Control, Honolulu, HI, pp. 1827–1834, Dec. 1990.
4.
Phillip
S. F.
and
Seborg
D. E.
, “
Conditions that guarantee no overshoot for linear systems
,”
Int. J. of Control
, vol.
47
, no.
4
, pp.
1043
1059
,
1988
.
5.
Vidyasagar
M.
, “
On undershoot and non-minimum phase zeros
,”
IEEE Trans. Automatic Control
, vol.
AC-31
, no.
5
, pp.
440
440
, May
1986
.
6.
S. Jayasuriya, A. G. Dharne, “Necessary and sufficient conditions for non-overshooting step responses for LTI systems,” Proc. 2002 American Control Conference, Anchorage, AK, pp. 505–510, May 2002.
7.
Moore
K. L.
and
Bhattacharyya
S. P.
, “
A technique for choosing locations for minimal overshoot
,”
IEEE Trans. Automatic Control
, vol.
35
, no.
5
, pp.
577
580
, May
1990
.
8.
Darbha
S.
and
Bhattacharyya
S. P.
, “
Controller synthesis for sign-invariant impulse response
,”
IEEE Trans. Automatic Control
, vol.
47
, no.
8
, pp.
1346
1351
, Aug.
2002
.
9.
A. Datta, M.-T. Ho, and S. P. Bhattacharyya, “Structure and synthesis of PID controllers,” Advances in industrial control, Springer, 2000, ch. 5.
10.
Ho
M.-T.
, “
Synthesis of H, PID controllers: A parametric approach
,”
Automatica
, vol.
39
, no.
6
, pp.
1069
1075
, June
2003
.
11.
K. P. Wong, “Control and modeling strategies for non-linear systems with time delays,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Dept. of Chem. Eng., University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 1985.
12.
Markland
C. A.
, “
Optimal model-following control system synthesis techniques
,”
Proc. IEE
, vol.
117
, pp.
623
627
,
1970
.
13.
W-J. Kim and S. Verma, “Multi-axis maglev positioner with high resolution over large travel range,” Proc. 2005 ASME Intl. Mech. Eng. Cong. Exp., Orlando, FL, paper no. 80050, Nov. 2005.
14.
Newell
R. B.
and
Fisher
D. G.
, “
Experimental evaluation of optimal multivariable regulatory controllers with model-following capabilities
,”
Automatica
, vol.
8
, no.
3
, pp.
247
262
, May
1972
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.