A Life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) was performed to compare life cycle costs of a novel gas turbine engine to that of a conventional microturbine with similar power capacity. This engine, called the High Pressure Regenerative Turbine Engine (HPRTE) operates on a pressurized semiclosed cycle and is integrated with a Vapor Absorption Refrigeration System (VARS). The HPRTE uses heat from its exhaust gases to power the absorption refrigeration unit which cools the high-pressure compressor inlet of the HPRTE to below ambient temperatures and also produces some external refrigeration. The life cycle cost analysis procedure is based on principles laid out in the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP). The influence of different design and economic parameters on the life cycle costs of both technologies is analyzed. The results of this analysis are expressed in terms of the cost ratios of the two technologies. The pressurized nature of the HPRTE leads to compact components resulting in significant savings in equipment cost versus those of a microturbine. Revenue obtained from external refrigeration offsets some of the fuel costs for the HPRTE, thus proving to be a major contributor in cost savings for the HPRTE. For the base case of a high-pressure turbine (HPT) inlet temperature of 1373 K and an exit temperature of 1073 K, the HPRTE showed life cycle cost savings of 7% over a microturbine with a similar power capacity.

1.
Fuller, K.S. and Petersen R.S., 1995, “Life Cycle Costing Manual for the Federal Energy Management Program,” NIST Handbook 135.
2.
Nemec, T.S. and Lear, W.E., 1998, “Thermodynamic Performance of a Semi-Closed Gas Turbine Combined with a Rankine Bottoming Cycle,” 36th AIAA Aerospace Science Meeting and Exhibition, Reno, Nevada, January 1998, AIAA Paper 98-0361.
3.
MacFarlane, R.S., 1997, “A Study of the Impact of Water Extraction on the Regenerative Feedback Turbine Engine Cycle,” M.S. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
4.
Muley, N., and Lear, W.E., 2003, “Effect of Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) on Thermal NOx Formation Rate,” 41th AIAA Aerospace Science Meeting and Exhibition, Reno, Nevada, January 6–9th 2003, AIAA Paper 2003-0503.
5.
Lear, W.E. and Laganelli, A.L., 1999, “High Pressure Regenerative Turbine Engine: 21st Century Propulsion,” Final Technical Report for Contract No. NAS3–27396.
6.
Boza, J.J., Lear, W.E., and Sherif, S.A., 2003, “Performance of a Novel Semi-Closed Gas Turbine Refrigeration Combined Cycle,” Proc., 2003 ASME TURBO EXPO, Georgia, Atlanta, June 16–19, 2003, ASME Paper 2003-GT-38576.
7.
Khan, J.K., Lear, W.E., and Sherif, S.A., 2004, “Performance of a Novel Combined Cooling and Power Gas Turbine with Water Harvesting,” Proc., 2004 ASME TURBO EXPO, Vienna, Austria, June 14–17, 2004, ASME Paper 2004-GT-53013.
8.
El-Sayed, Y. and Tribus, M., 1992, “Strategic Use of Thermoeconomics for System Improvement,” Journal of Engineering for Power, pp. 27–34.
9.
Frangopoulus, C.A., 1983, “Thermoeconomic Functional Analysis: A Method for Optimal Design or Improvement of Complex Thermal System,” Ph. D. Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
10.
Massardo
A. F.
and
Scialo`
M.
,
2000
, “
Thermoeconomic Analysis of Gas Turbine Based Cycle
,”
Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
,
122
, pp.
664
671
.
11.
McDonald, C.F. and Rodgers, C., 2005, “Ceramic Recuperator and Turbine: the Key to Achieving a 40 Percent Efficient Microturbine,” Proc., 2005 ASME TURBO EXPO, Reno, Nevada, U.S.A, June 6–9, 2005, ASME Paper GT2005-68644.
12.
Traverso, A., Massardo, A.F., Cazzola, W., and Lagorio, G., 2004, “WIDGET-TEMP: A Novel Web-Based Approach for Themoeconomic Analysis and Optimization of Conventional and Innovative Cycles,” Proc., 2004 ASME TURBO EXPO, Vienna, Austria, June 14–17, 2004, ASME Paper 2004-GT-54115.
13.
McDonald
C. F.
,
2000
, “
Low-Cost Compact Primary Surface Recuperator Concept for Microturbines
,”
Applied Thermal Engineering
, Vol.
20
, pp.
471
497
.
14.
Douglas, D.Q., 1998, “Conceptual Design of Chemical Processes,” McGraw Hill Books, New York.
15.
ENERGY NEXUS GROUP, 2002, “Technology Characterization: Microturbines,” Prepared for the Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC.
16.
Federal Energy Management Program, 2000, “Integrated Systems,” DOE/EE-0234, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.