Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death in the world today. According to the American Heart Association 529,659 people in 1999 died as a result of CAD [1]. Starting in the 1960’s, surgeons have used Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) techniques in order to reestablish blood flow to the heart. Today, the procedure remains the same, using autologous grafts, such as the mammary artery and the saphenous vein. An unresolved problem, is that a significant number of CABGs reocclude months to years postoperatively. In the case of Saphenous Vein Grafts (SVGs) typically 50% of these bypasses are totally occluded months to years after the procedure, the remaining half being more than 50% occluded [2]. The re-occlusion of CABGs is due to a process labeled intimal hyperplasia (IH). Investigators have shown that IH, believed by some to be a remodeling process, occurs at branch sites, regions of curvature, and anastomotic junctions [3,4]. At these sites there are low residence times, slow secondary structures, disturbed flow, and areas of recirculation, therefore the onset of IH is believed to be hemodynamically linked. Most recently, floor IH has been attributed to four variables: time averaged wall shear stress (WSS), oscillating shear index (OSI), spatial wall shear stress gradients (WSSG), and temporal WSSG [5]. Adverse values of these parameters, in the case of SVGs, are believed to be caused by impedance mismatch at the anastomosis site. Over time this characteristic causes a bulge at the sinus. Such a morphology additionally contributes to disturbed flows which tend to propagate down the CABG and are believed to play a major role in the development of IH and the eventual failure of the graft.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2002 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition
November 17–22, 2002
New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Bioengineering Division
ISBN:
0-7918-3650-9
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Preliminary Near Wall Hemodynamic Evaluation of a Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Model With a Flow Streamlining Implant
Pedro D. Pedroso,
Pedro D. Pedroso
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
Search for other works by this author on:
Andreas S. Anayiotos,
Andreas S. Anayiotos
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
Search for other works by this author on:
Brad L. Hershey,
Brad L. Hershey
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
Search for other works by this author on:
Evangelos Eleftheriou,
Evangelos Eleftheriou
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
Search for other works by this author on:
William L. Holman
William L. Holman
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
Search for other works by this author on:
Pedro D. Pedroso
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
Andreas S. Anayiotos
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
Brad L. Hershey
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
Evangelos Eleftheriou
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
William L. Holman
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
Paper No:
IMECE2002-32566, pp. 271-272; 2 pages
Published Online:
June 3, 2008
Citation
Pedroso, PD, Anayiotos, AS, Hershey, BL, Eleftheriou, E, & Holman, WL. "Preliminary Near Wall Hemodynamic Evaluation of a Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Model With a Flow Streamlining Implant." Proceedings of the ASME 2002 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. Advances in Bioengineering. New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. November 17–22, 2002. pp. 271-272. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2002-32566
Download citation file:
7
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Effect of Geometrical Assumptions on Numerical Modeling of Coronary Blood Flow Under Normal and Disease Conditions
J Biomech Eng (June,2010)
Flow Input Waveform Effects on the Temporal and Spatial Wall Shear Stress Gradients in a Femoral Graft-Artery Connector
J Biomech Eng (November,1996)
Wall Shear Stresses Remain Elevated in Mature Arteriovenous Fistulas: A Case Study
J Biomech Eng (February,2011)
Related Chapters
Special Thermal Problems
Pipe Stress Engineering
Section III: Subsections NC and ND — Class 2 and 3 Components
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 1, Fourth Edition
USE OF A GEOHAZARD MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TO REDUCE PIPELINE FAILURE RATES
Pipeline Integrity Management Under Geohazard Conditions (PIMG)