When the BWR at Duane Arnold went on-line, it was rated at 565.7 MWe. Some time ago, due to operational and other problems it was determined that it would be economical to isolate the HP reheaters from service in the double-stage two Moisture Separator Reheaters (MSRs). Duane Arnold is now undergoing an extensive and lengthy life-extension and uprating program, targeted at 16 percent involving many components. After a detailed study involving several alternative approaches to upgrading the MSRs in conjunction with a new, larger HP turbine, they have now been completely redesigned and reconstructed using essentially the original configuration — 2-pass LP and HP reheaters with chevron moisture separator sections, but using advanced technology throughout and in conjunction with the optimization of the uprated turbine generator. In order to minimize component installation time and reduce personnel radiation exposure, the modern Moisture Separation (M.S.) components were “modularized” — installed as four completely preassembled M.S. sections replacing the need for the in-shell installation of multiple small components. This paper covers the many alternative choices considered and details all elements and phases of the final MSR upgrade design and installation process selected. The installation of a new main turbine, oversized in anticipation of an increase in thermal power, was expected to result in a decrease of about 10 MWe due to throttling losses across the turbine control valves. The refurbished MSR with restored second stage reheat was expected to just offset this loss. Post installation testing showed a gain of 4 MWe beyond the offset of the turbine control valve throttling losses. As a result, the net gain over previous operation is therefore 4 MWe even though the new MSR is responsible for gain of about 14 MWe.
Skip Nav Destination
2002 International Joint Power Generation Conference
June 24–26, 2002
Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Power Division
ISBN:
0-7918-3617-7
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
MSR Upgrade at Duane Arnold Uses Modularization to Cut Radiation Exposure and Erection Time
Eric S. Sorenson,
Eric S. Sorenson
Duane Arnold Energy Center, Palo, IA
Search for other works by this author on:
Abraham L. Yarden,
Abraham L. Yarden
Thermal Engineering International, Los Angeles, CA
Search for other works by this author on:
Chester S. Sullivan,
Chester S. Sullivan
Duane Arnold Energy Center, Palo, IA
Search for other works by this author on:
Clement W. Tam
Clement W. Tam
Thermal Engineering International, Los Angeles, CA
Search for other works by this author on:
Eric S. Sorenson
Duane Arnold Energy Center, Palo, IA
Abraham L. Yarden
Thermal Engineering International, Los Angeles, CA
Chester S. Sullivan
Duane Arnold Energy Center, Palo, IA
Clement W. Tam
Thermal Engineering International, Los Angeles, CA
Paper No:
IJPGC2002-26033, pp. 225-228; 4 pages
Published Online:
February 24, 2009
Citation
Sorenson, ES, Yarden, AL, Sullivan, CS, & Tam, CW. "MSR Upgrade at Duane Arnold Uses Modularization to Cut Radiation Exposure and Erection Time." Proceedings of the 2002 International Joint Power Generation Conference. 2002 International Joint Power Generation Conference. Scottsdale, Arizona, USA. June 24–26, 2002. pp. 225-228. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/IJPGC2002-26033
Download citation file:
7
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Demonstration of a Palm-Sized 30 W Air-to-Power Turbine Generator
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (October,2011)
Assessment of Waste Heat Recovery From a Heavy-Duty Truck Engine by Means of an ORC Turbogenerator
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (April,2013)
The Application of System CFD to the Design and Optimization of High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (May,2008)
Related Chapters
Iwe and Iwl
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 2, Third Edition
IWE and IWL
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 2, Second Edition: Criteria and Commentary on Select Aspects of the Boiler & Pressure Vessel and Piping Codes
Fatigue Verification and Nonlinear Alternatives
Toward Consistent Design Evaluation of Nuclear Power Piping by Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis