The majority of computational fluid dynamics studies for turbine film cooling have employed the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes equations with various turbulence modeling techniques to achieve closure, most notably the various two equation (k-ε or k-ω) models. For computational simulation of film cooling, modeling the entire testing domain with a row of multiple holes while sustaining a sufficiently fine mesh would demand a large number of grid cells and a hefty computational expense. A significant reduction in the computational domain can be and has been achieved without much harm to the overall accuracy of the film cooling prediction. The current study aimed to investigate the necessary domain parameters for reducing the grid cell count without significantly affecting the accuracy of the solution. The Box-Behnken design for response surface methodology was employed to determine the relative influence of each parameter on the cooling effectiveness prediction. The experimental design matrix was executed for multiple blowing ratios (0.5, 1.0, 2.0) to include the effects of the blowing ratio on the computational domain. The work was carried out using a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics finite volume method with the RANS equations and k-ε turbulence model. A cylindrical film cooling hole with a pitch-to-diameter ratio of 3.0, a length-to-diameter ratio of 7.5, and an inclination angle of 35° was studied. The results are compared against existing data in the literature as well as in-house experimental data. The data from each case is compared in terms of spatially-averaged effectiveness. The modeled entrance length was found to be the most important parameter, with the mainflow height a distant second. The size of the modeled plenum was not found to exert any significant influence on the effectiveness results. Explanations are offered for notable trends in the data and conclusions are drawn concerning the grid optimization process.
Skip Nav Destination
2010 14th International Heat Transfer Conference
August 8–13, 2010
Washington, DC, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Heat Transfer Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-4940-8
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Sensitivity Analysis of Domain Considerations for Numerical Simulations of Film Cooling
Perry L. Johnson,
Perry L. Johnson
University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL
Search for other works by this author on:
Cuong Q. Nguyen,
Cuong Q. Nguyen
University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL
Search for other works by this author on:
Son H. Ho,
Son H. Ho
University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL
Search for other works by this author on:
Jayanta S. Kapat
Jayanta S. Kapat
University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL
Search for other works by this author on:
Perry L. Johnson
University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL
Cuong Q. Nguyen
University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL
Son H. Ho
University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL
Jayanta S. Kapat
University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL
Paper No:
IHTC14-23241, pp. 285-300; 16 pages
Published Online:
March 1, 2011
Citation
Johnson, PL, Nguyen, CQ, Ho, SH, & Kapat, JS. "Sensitivity Analysis of Domain Considerations for Numerical Simulations of Film Cooling." Proceedings of the 2010 14th International Heat Transfer Conference. 2010 14th International Heat Transfer Conference, Volume 5. Washington, DC, USA. August 8–13, 2010. pp. 285-300. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/IHTC14-23241
Download citation file:
16
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Material Property Identification and Sensitivity Analysis Using Micro-Indentation
J. Tribol (July,2009)
Sensitivity Analysis of a Heat Exchanger Tube Fitted With Cross-Cut Twisted Tape With Alternate Axis
J. Heat Transfer (April,2019)
Forecasting and Optimization of the Viscosity of Nano-oil Containing Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Using the Response Surface Method and Sensitivity Analysis
J. Energy Resour. Technol (November,2020)
Related Chapters
Sensitivity Analysis of Zwart-Gerber-Belamri Model Parameters on the Numerical Simulation of Francis Runner Cavitation
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)
An Axiomatic Design Interpretation on the Use of Response Surface Methodology to Solve Coupled Designs
Advances in Multidisciplinary Engineering
Response Surface Aberrations
Engineering Optimization: Applications, Methods, and Analysis