This paper uses the method developed by Billionnet et al. (1999) to obtain tight upper bounds on the optimal values of mixed integer linear programming (MILP) formulations in grid-based wind farm layout optimization. The MILP formulations in grid-based wind farm layout optimization can be seen as linearized versions of the 0-1 quadratic knapsack problem (QKP) in combinatorial optimization. The QKP is NP-hard, which means the MILP formulations remain difficult problems to solve, especially for large problems with grid sizes of more than 500 points. The upper bound method proposed by Billionnet et al. is particularly well-suited for grid-based wind farm layout optimization problems, and was able to provide tight optimality gaps for a range of numerical experiments with up to 1296 grid points. The results of the numerical experiments also suggest that the greedy algorithm is a promising solution method for large MILP formulations in grid-based layout optimization that cannot be solved using standard branch and bound solvers.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2016 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
August 21–24, 2016
Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Design Engineering Division
- Computers and Information in Engineering Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-5010-7
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
A Tight Upper Bound for Grid-Based Wind Farm Layout Optimization
Ning Quan,
Ning Quan
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL
Search for other works by this author on:
Harrison Kim
Harrison Kim
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL
Search for other works by this author on:
Ning Quan
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL
Harrison Kim
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL
Paper No:
DETC2016-59712, V02AT03A022; 7 pages
Published Online:
December 5, 2016
Citation
Quan, N, & Kim, H. "A Tight Upper Bound for Grid-Based Wind Farm Layout Optimization." Proceedings of the ASME 2016 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 2A: 42nd Design Automation Conference. Charlotte, North Carolina, USA. August 21–24, 2016. V02AT03A022. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2016-59712
Download citation file:
16
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Optimal Allocation of Lift-Gas Rates Under Multiple Facility Constraints: A Mixed Integer Linear Programming Approach
J. Energy Resour. Technol (December,2006)
Integrating Reconfiguration Cost Into the Design of Multi-Period Scalable Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (February,2007)
Optimum Selection of Discrete Tolerances
J. Mech., Trans., and Automation (June,1989)
Related Chapters
Scheduling of the Thai Premier League by Integer Programming
International Conference on Computer Research and Development, 5th (ICCRD 2013)
An Implemenation of Mixed Integer Programming Model for Gene Selection in Cancer Classification Using Microary Data
International Conference on Software Technology and Engineering (ICSTE 2012)
Hybrid GA∕IA Method for Multiobjective Nonlinear Integer Programming Problems
Intelligent Engineering Systems through Artificial Neural Networks Volume 18