Our prior work presented a method for computationally structuring patent databases as a basis for an automated design-by-analogy tool. In order to examine the validity and sensibility of the prior work as the basis for a design tool, its output is compared in detail to expert designers’ mental models of the domain being structured, i.e., a set of 45 patents and their inter-relationships. The comparison sought first to gauge the intuitiveness and sensibility of the computational method of structuring to human minds, and further to ascertain whether any differences between the method’s and the experts’ structures indicate potentially novel or surprising ways of approaching the space of patents, or indicate that the output was nonsensical, invalid or needing modification in order to be useable. The results indicate that, when compared to expert thinking, the computationally generated structure is sensible in its clustering of patents and in its organization of these clusters into a structure or space. The results also suggest that the computationally-generated structure represents a version of the patent space upon which experts can find common ground and consensus — making it likely to be intuitive and accessible to a broad cohort of designers. Thus, the prior work which presented a computational method for structuring design databases has been found to offer a resource-efficient way of usefully representing the space that is sensible to expert designers, while still preserving an element of surprise and unexpectedness, making it promising as the basis for a computational design-by-analogy inspiration tool.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2013 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
August 4–7, 2013
Portland, Oregon, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Design Engineering Division
- Computers and Information in Engineering Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-5592-8
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Testing the Basis for an Automated Design-by-Analogy Tool Through Comparison to Expert Thinking
Katherine Fu,
Katherine Fu
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
Search for other works by this author on:
Joel Chan,
Joel Chan
University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
Search for other works by this author on:
Christian Schunn,
Christian Schunn
University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
Search for other works by this author on:
Jonathan Cagan,
Jonathan Cagan
Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Search for other works by this author on:
Kenneth Kotovsky
Kenneth Kotovsky
Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Search for other works by this author on:
Katherine Fu
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
Joel Chan
University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
Christian Schunn
University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
Jonathan Cagan
Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Kenneth Kotovsky
Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Paper No:
DETC2013-12128, V005T06A026; 16 pages
Published Online:
February 12, 2014
Citation
Fu, K, Chan, J, Schunn, C, Cagan, J, & Kotovsky, K. "Testing the Basis for an Automated Design-by-Analogy Tool Through Comparison to Expert Thinking." Proceedings of the ASME 2013 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 5: 25th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology; ASME 2013 Power Transmission and Gearing Conference. Portland, Oregon, USA. August 4–7, 2013. V005T06A026. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2013-12128
Download citation file:
15
Views
0
Citations
Related Proceedings Papers
Patents: Restoring Safety
DETC99
Related Articles
Preliminary Development and Engineering Evaluation of a Novel Cricothyrotomy Device
J. Med. Devices (June,2010)
Deriving Design Feature Vectors for Patent Images Using Convolutional Neural Networks
J. Mech. Des (June,2021)
Discovering Structure in Design Databases Through Functional and Surface Based Mapping
J. Mech. Des (March,2013)
Related Chapters
On the Exact Analysis of Non-Coherent Fault Trees: The ASTRA Package (PSAM-0285)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Later Single-Cylinder Engines
Air Engines: The History, Science, and Reality of the Perfect Engine
Alternative Systems
Turbo/Supercharger Compressors and Turbines for Aircraft Propulsion in WWII: Theory, History and Practice—Guidance from the Past for Modern Engineers and Students