Various methods exist to model leaf springs with each method having different advantages and disadvantages. Computational efficiency and accuracy are two important factors when choosing a modeling technique especially when the simulation models become large. This paper compares the computational efficiency and accuracy of an elasto-plastic leaf spring model to a neural network leaf spring model. The advantages and disadvantages of the two modeling techniques are discussed and suggestions are made for the best use of both models. It is also shown that combining the two methods can overcome some of the disadvantages and exploit the advantages of both methods. The results from the comparison quantify the accuracy and computational efficiency of the two methods giving concrete parameters for the analyst to decide on which model to use.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2012 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
August 12–15, 2012
Chicago, Illinois, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Design Engineering Division
- Computers and Information in Engineering Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-4505-9
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Computational Efficiency and Accuracy Comparison of Leaf Spring Modelling Techniques
Cor-Jacques Kat,
Cor-Jacques Kat
University of Pretoria, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa
Search for other works by this author on:
Jennifer L. Johrendt,
Jennifer L. Johrendt
University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Pieter S. Els
Pieter S. Els
University of Pretoria, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa
Search for other works by this author on:
Cor-Jacques Kat
University of Pretoria, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa
Jennifer L. Johrendt
University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada
Pieter S. Els
University of Pretoria, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa
Paper No:
DETC2012-70794, pp. 605-613; 9 pages
Published Online:
September 9, 2013
Citation
Kat, C, Johrendt, JL, & Els, PS. "Computational Efficiency and Accuracy Comparison of Leaf Spring Modelling Techniques." Proceedings of the ASME 2012 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 6: 1st Biennial International Conference on Dynamics for Design; 14th International Conference on Advanced Vehicle Technologies. Chicago, Illinois, USA. August 12–15, 2012. pp. 605-613. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2012-70794
Download citation file:
7
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
A Virtual Lab for Composite Materials
IMECE2004
Related Articles
Modeling, Feedforward Control, and Constrained Trajectory Generation for a Concrete Conveyance System
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (October,2023)
Enhanced Formulae for Determining Both Free Length and Rate of Cylindrical Compression Springs
J. Mech. Des (February,2016)
Related Chapters
Estimation of the Concrete Strength Setting off from the Physical Properties of the Aggregates by Artificial Neural Network and Linear Regression Method and Comparison of the Results
International Conference on Future Computer and Communication, 3rd (ICFCC 2011)
Health Monitoring of Prestressing Strands in Concrete Structures Using Artificial Neural Network
Intelligent Engineering Systems through Artificial Neural Networks, Volume 16
Functionality and Operability Criteria
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 2, Third Edition