Function models are used during the conceptual design phase of the design process to model the intended use or objective of a product, independent of the products physical form. Function models also aid in guiding design activities such as generating concepts and allocating design team resources. Recent research effort have focused on the formalization of function models through a controlled vocabulary and archival of functional representations in computer-based repositories. However, the usefulness and interpretability of these function models has not fully been explored. This paper presents the results of a user study to ascertain the interpretability of functional representations at three levels of abstraction. In this interpretability is defined as the ability to identify the product based on a functional representation. These function models vary in abstraction in two dimensions: (1) the number of function within the model and (2) the specificity of the terms used within the functional models. Sixteen mechanical engineering graduate students are asked to identify the products from the functional models in these three abstraction levels. In addition to identifying the product, students are asked to record time and list any keywords in the functional model that help them to choose a product. Analysis of the results indicates that interpretability of a functional model increases substantially by using free language terms over a limited functional vocabulary and environmental context of the product. Additionally, the number of functions within the functional model correlates with the identification of similar products.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2009 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
August 30–September 2, 2009
San Diego, California, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Design Engineering Division and Computers in Engineering Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-4905-7
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Investigation of the Interpretability of Three Function Structure Representations: A User Study
Jonathan Thomas,
Jonathan Thomas
Clemson University, Clemson, SC
Search for other works by this author on:
Chiradeep Sen,
Chiradeep Sen
Clemson University, Clemson, SC
Search for other works by this author on:
Gregory M. Mocko,
Gregory M. Mocko
Clemson University, Clemson, SC
Search for other works by this author on:
Joshua D. Summers,
Joshua D. Summers
Clemson University, Clemson, SC
Search for other works by this author on:
Georges M. Fadel
Georges M. Fadel
Clemson University, Clemson, SC
Search for other works by this author on:
Jonathan Thomas
Clemson University, Clemson, SC
Chiradeep Sen
Clemson University, Clemson, SC
Gregory M. Mocko
Clemson University, Clemson, SC
Joshua D. Summers
Clemson University, Clemson, SC
Georges M. Fadel
Clemson University, Clemson, SC
Paper No:
DETC2009-87381, pp. 1055-1068; 14 pages
Published Online:
July 29, 2010
Citation
Thomas, J, Sen, C, Mocko, GM, Summers, JD, & Fadel, GM. "Investigation of the Interpretability of Three Function Structure Representations: A User Study." Proceedings of the ASME 2009 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 8: 14th Design for Manufacturing and the Life Cycle Conference; 6th Symposium on International Design and Design Education; 21st International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, Parts A and B. San Diego, California, USA. August 30–September 2, 2009. pp. 1055-1068. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2009-87381
Download citation file:
12
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
In Memoriam: Frederick F. Ling
J. Tribol (July,2015)
Design Integrated in the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum: Assessment of the Engineering Clinics
J. Mech. Des (July,2007)
Related Chapters
Digital Human in Engineering and Bioengineering Applications
Advances in Computers and Information in Engineering Research, Volume 1
Development of Electronic Learning Industrial Environment (eLIN) System for Requirement Engineering Education
International Conference on Computer Technology and Development, 3rd (ICCTD 2011)
The future state of content & competency-based engineering education: Lean Engineering Education
Lean Engineering Education: Driving Content and Competency Mastery