Since engineering design requires decision making under uncertainty, the degree to which good decisions can be made depends upon the degree to which the decision maker has expressive and accurate representations of his or her uncertain beliefs. Whereas traditional decision analysis uses precise probability distributions to represent uncertain beliefs, recent research has examined the effects of relaxing this assumption of precision. A specific example of this is the theory of imprecise probability. Imprecise probabilities are more expressive than precise probabilities, but they are also more computationally expensive to propagate through mathematical models. The probability box (p-box) is an alternative representation that is both more expressive than precise probabilities, and less computationally expensive than general imprecise probabilities. In this paper, we introduce a method for propagating p-boxes through black box models. Based on two example models, a new method, called p-box convolution sampling (PCS), is compared with three other p-box propagation methods. It is found that, although PCS is less expensive than the alternatives, it is still relatively expensive and therefore only justifiable when the expected benefits are large. Several directions for further improving the efficiency of PCS are discussed.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2006 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
September 10–13, 2006
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Design Engineering Division and Computers and Information in Engineering Division
ISBN:
0-7918-4255-X
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Numerical Methods for Propagating Imprecise Uncertainty
Morgan Bruns,
Morgan Bruns
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
Search for other works by this author on:
Christiaan J. J. Paredis
Christiaan J. J. Paredis
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
Search for other works by this author on:
Morgan Bruns
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
Christiaan J. J. Paredis
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
Paper No:
DETC2006-99237, pp. 1077-1091; 15 pages
Published Online:
June 3, 2008
Citation
Bruns, M, & Paredis, CJJ. "Numerical Methods for Propagating Imprecise Uncertainty." Proceedings of the ASME 2006 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 1: 32nd Design Automation Conference, Parts A and B. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. September 10–13, 2006. pp. 1077-1091. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2006-99237
Download citation file:
22
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
An Approach for Testing Methods for Modeling Uncertainty
J. Mech. Des (September,2006)
Numerical Analysis of the Basketball Shot
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (December,2003)
Why Do Verification and Validation?
J. Verif. Valid. Uncert (March,2016)
Related Chapters
Utility Function Fundamentals
Decision Making in Engineering Design
Performance-Based Expert Judgement Weighting Using Moment Methods (PSAM-0264)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Normative Decision Analysis in Engineering Design
Decision Making in Engineering Design