With increasingly aggressive competition for market share, manufacturing companies are facing the challenge of providing nearly customized products at bulk prices. To achieve this, product families — a group of related products derived from a single product platform — have been used to provide strategic variety to satisfy customer requirements and simultaneously achieve economies of scale. Many methods for product family design have been developed. However, we still lack the ability to evaluate a product family based on quantitative tradeoffs between product family commonality and product family variety. In this paper, we introduce the Product Family Evaluation Graph (PFEG), which can assist product family designers choosing the “best” product family design among a set of product family design options. This method is complete in its formulation, but lacking in tools for implementation. It is our purpose to show the usefulness of such a method and discuss its foundation. We show how the tool can be used to compare candidate product family designs and used in the robust design of a single product family. In addition, we highlight the strategic factors and measures that are the basis for evaluating any product family. We offer ten example strategic factors — customization, market life, technological innovation, family size, complexity, development time, service and maintenance, environmental impacts, manufacturing cost, and production volume — that determine the ideal tradeoff strategy between commonality and variety. We also highlight the need for more research into the validity of these factors, the specific relationships between these factors, and a tradeoff strategy. The measures of commonality are shown to be well established. However, we show that there is still a glaring need for the quantitative evaluation of product family variety. In summary, this paper is intended as a starting place, an opening set of questions, and as a framework for the general solution to the problem of a quantitative evaluation of product family design.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2005 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
September 24–28, 2005
Long Beach, California, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Design Engineering Division and Computers and Information in Engineering Division
ISBN:
0-7918-4742-X
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
An Introduction to Product Family Evaluation Graphs
Xiaoli Ye,
Xiaoli Ye
Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI
Search for other works by this author on:
John K. Gershenson,
John K. Gershenson
Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI
Search for other works by this author on:
Kiran Khadke,
Kiran Khadke
Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI
Search for other works by this author on:
Xiaoxia Lai,
Xiaoxia Lai
Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI
Search for other works by this author on:
Fang Guo
Fang Guo
Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI
Search for other works by this author on:
Xiaoli Ye
Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI
John K. Gershenson
Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI
Kiran Khadke
Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI
Xiaoxia Lai
Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI
Fang Guo
Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI
Paper No:
DETC2005-85229, pp. 403-412; 10 pages
Published Online:
June 11, 2008
Citation
Ye, X, Gershenson, JK, Khadke, K, Lai, X, & Guo, F. "An Introduction to Product Family Evaluation Graphs." Proceedings of the ASME 2005 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 5a: 17th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology. Long Beach, California, USA. September 24–28, 2005. pp. 403-412. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2005-85229
Download citation file:
9
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
A Multiattribute Utility Theory-Based Method for Product Line Selection
J. Mech. Des (November,2007)
A Sustainable Product Multi-Platform Planning Model for Assembly and Disassembly Process
J. Mech. Des (September,2024)
An Investigation on the Implications of Design Process Phases on Artifact Novelty
J. Mech. Des (May,2015)
Related Chapters
Processing Free Form Objects within a Product Development Process Framework
Advances in Computers and Information in Engineering Research, Volume 1
Influencing the Total Costs
Cost-Efficient Design
Energy & Power
Engineering the Everyday and the Extraordinary: Milestones in Innovation