The use of kriging models for approximation and global optimization has been steadily on the rise in the past decade. The standard approach used in the Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments (DACE) is to use an Ordinary kriging model to approximate a deterministic computer model. Universal and Detrended kriging are two alternative types of kriging models. In this paper, a description on the basics of kriging is given, highlighting the similarities and differences between these three different types of kriging models and the underlying assumptions behind each. A comparative study on the use of three different types of kriging models is then presented using six test problems. The methods of Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) and Cross-Validation (CV) for model parameter estimation are compared for the three kriging model types. A one-dimension problem is first used to visualize the differences between the different models. In order to show applications in higher dimensions, four two-dimension and a 5-dimension problem are also given.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2003 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
September 2–6, 2003
Chicago, Illinois, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Design Engineering Division and Computers and Information in Engineering Division
ISBN:
0-7918-3700-9
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
A Study on the Use of Kriging Models to Approximate Deterministic Computer Models
Jay D. Martin,
Jay D. Martin
Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA
Search for other works by this author on:
Timothy W. Simpson
Timothy W. Simpson
Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Search for other works by this author on:
Jay D. Martin
Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA
Timothy W. Simpson
Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Paper No:
DETC2003/DAC-48762, pp. 567-576; 10 pages
Published Online:
June 23, 2008
Citation
Martin, JD, & Simpson, TW. "A Study on the Use of Kriging Models to Approximate Deterministic Computer Models." Proceedings of the ASME 2003 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 2: 29th Design Automation Conference, Parts A and B. Chicago, Illinois, USA. September 2–6, 2003. pp. 567-576. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2003/DAC-48762
Download citation file:
41
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Blind Kriging: A New Method for Developing Metamodels
J. Mech. Des (March,2008)
Multiresponse Metamodeling in Simulation-Based Design Applications
J. Mech. Des (September,2012)
Quantification of Model Uncertainty: Calibration, Model Discrepancy, and Identifiability
J. Mech. Des (October,2012)
Related Chapters
A Demonstration of a Universal Kriging Program for Monitoring Sediments in Lakes
Chemical and Biological Characterization of Municipal Sludges, Sediments, Dredge Spoils, and Drilling Muds
Modeling Spatial Variability Using Geostatistical Simulation
Geostatistics for Environmental and Geotechnical Applications
Importance of Stationarity for Geostatistical Assessment of Enviromental Contamination
Geostatistics for Environmental and Geotechnical Applications