In order to recommend a pool scrubbing model to be applied in investigating the aerosol pool scrubbing effect of spent fuel pool (SFP) during the period of CAP1400 containment overpressure release, different pool scrubbing models are studied in this paper. At first, the thermal hydraulic processes and aerosol retention mechanisms considered in five mainstream pool scrubbing models are compared briefly, through which SPARC-B/98 model (the updated version of SPARC-90) is identified as the most comprehensive one. Subsequently, ACE aerosol pool scrubbing experiments are simulated using SPARC-B/98 and SPARC-90 model respectively, whose results could contribute to assess the conservatism of the two models. At last, considering the lack of experimental decontamination factor (DF) data under CAP1400 SFP pool scrubbing boundary conditions, sensitivity study involving these special conditions is performed with SPARC-B/98 and SPARC-90 model, in which injected gas flow rate, steam volume fraction in injected gas and pool temperature are selected as the analyzed parameters. The results show that SPARC-B/98 model is more conservative and applicable under SFP pool scrubbing boundary conditions and are advised to be used in analyzing the SFP aerosol pool scrubbing effect.
Skip Nav Destination
2017 25th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering
July 2–6, 2017
Shanghai, China
Conference Sponsors:
- Nuclear Engineering Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-5785-4
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Comparison Research on Different Aerosol Pool Scrubbing Models Available to Purchase
Shengqin Gao,
Shengqin Gao
Shanghai Nuclear Engineering Research and Design Institute, Shanghai, China
Search for other works by this author on:
Yaru Fu,
Yaru Fu
Shanghai Nuclear Engineering Research and Design Institute, Shanghai, China
Search for other works by this author on:
Dawei Sun,
Dawei Sun
Shanghai Nuclear Engineering Research and Design Institute, Shanghai, China
Search for other works by this author on:
Qiliang Mei,
Qiliang Mei
Shanghai Nuclear Engineering Research and Design Institute, Shanghai, China
Search for other works by this author on:
Nan Pan,
Nan Pan
Shanghai Nuclear Engineering Research and Design Institute, Shanghai, China
Search for other works by this author on:
Shanshan Zhang,
Shanshan Zhang
Shanghai Nuclear Engineering Research and Design Institute, Shanghai, China
Search for other works by this author on:
Gaofeng Huang
Gaofeng Huang
Shanghai Nuclear Engineering Research and Design Institute, Shanghai, China
Search for other works by this author on:
Shengqin Gao
Shanghai Nuclear Engineering Research and Design Institute, Shanghai, China
Yaru Fu
Shanghai Nuclear Engineering Research and Design Institute, Shanghai, China
Dawei Sun
Shanghai Nuclear Engineering Research and Design Institute, Shanghai, China
Qiliang Mei
Shanghai Nuclear Engineering Research and Design Institute, Shanghai, China
Nan Pan
Shanghai Nuclear Engineering Research and Design Institute, Shanghai, China
Shanshan Zhang
Shanghai Nuclear Engineering Research and Design Institute, Shanghai, China
Gaofeng Huang
Shanghai Nuclear Engineering Research and Design Institute, Shanghai, China
Paper No:
ICONE25-66540, V007T10A012; 7 pages
Published Online:
October 17, 2017
Citation
Gao, S, Fu, Y, Sun, D, Mei, Q, Pan, N, Zhang, S, & Huang, G. "Comparison Research on Different Aerosol Pool Scrubbing Models." Proceedings of the 2017 25th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering. Volume 7: Fuel Cycle, Decontamination and Decommissioning, Radiation Protection, Shielding, and Waste Management; Mitigation Strategies for Beyond Design Basis Events. Shanghai, China. July 2–6, 2017. V007T10A012. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/ICONE25-66540
Download citation file:
59
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Two-Dimensional Axi-Symmetric Model of a Solar-Thermal Fluid-Wall Aerosol Flow Reactor
J. Sol. Energy Eng (February,2005)
PCB Migration and Cleanup Scenarios in Natural Gas Pipelines
J. Energy Resour. Technol (June,2004)
Numerical Study of the Deposition of Radioactive Nuclide (Aerosol) in Pressurized Water Reactor Steam Generator
ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci (April,2022)
Related Chapters
Subsection NCA—General Requirements for Division 1 and Division 2
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 1, Third Edition
Subsection NCA—General Requirements for Division 1 and Division 2
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 1, Second Edition
PSA Level 2 — NPP Ringhals 2 (PSAM-0156)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)