Knowing and minimizing the critical submergence of storage tanks for various operating conditions in power plants is very valuable to engineers. The goal is to maximize the usable emergency water volume and maintain tank operations such that no air (from vortexing or otherwise) is ever withdrawn into tank suction nozzle(s), that then could jeopardize continued operation of system pumps. While empirically derived curves for air withdrawal predictions can provide some general guidance, they cannot predict actual submergence requirements, especially when return flow is present and water level drops continuously. Physical hydraulic models can be used effectively to determine the critical submergence for plant specific geometries at all possible operating conditions. This paper presents a range of results of physical model studies conducted to determine critical submergence at various operating conditions and compares them with empirically derived curves to determine any possible trends or definitive rules. Critical submergence for all points on all studies was below the Hydraulic Institute boundary curve for pump intake design and below the Reddy and Pickford boundary curve for all cases without return flow to the tank and most with return flow to the tank. Both are much more conservative estimates at high Froude numbers as compared with lower Froude numbers. The Harleman curve, which was derived for the selective withdrawal of density stratified fluids, is neither predictive nor conservative.
Skip Nav Destination
2016 24th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering
June 26–30, 2016
Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Nuclear Engineering Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-5001-5
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Vortexing and Air Withdrawal Evaluations for Storage Tanks Using Physical Hydraulic Model Studies
Amie Humphrey Facendola,
Amie Humphrey Facendola
Alden Research Laboratory, Holden, MA
Search for other works by this author on:
Ludwig Haber,
Ludwig Haber
Alden Research Laboratory, Holden, MA
Search for other works by this author on:
Andrew Johansson
Andrew Johansson
Alden Research Laboratory, Holden, MA
Search for other works by this author on:
Amie Humphrey Facendola
Alden Research Laboratory, Holden, MA
Ludwig Haber
Alden Research Laboratory, Holden, MA
Andrew Johansson
Alden Research Laboratory, Holden, MA
Paper No:
ICONE24-60768, V001T03A023; 6 pages
Published Online:
October 25, 2016
Citation
Humphrey Facendola, A, Haber, L, & Johansson, A. "Vortexing and Air Withdrawal Evaluations for Storage Tanks Using Physical Hydraulic Model Studies." Proceedings of the 2016 24th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering. Charlotte, North Carolina, USA. June 26–30, 2016. V001T03A023. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/ICONE24-60768
Download citation file:
14
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Studies of Power Station Feed Pump Loss of Suction Pressure Incidents
J. Fluids Eng (December,1988)
Jet Pump Cavitation
J. Basic Eng (September,1970)
Analysis of Power Plant Deaerator Under Transient Turbine Loads
J. Eng. Power (July,1973)
Related Chapters
Lessons Learned: NRC Experience
Continuing and Changing Priorities of the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes and Standards
Modeling of SAMG Operator Actions in Level 2 PSA (PSAM-0164)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Subsection NCA—General Requirements for Division 1 and Division 2
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 1, Second Edition