CPR1000 plant operation is based on a centralized and computerized control mean (the KIC system), that provides all the means needed by the shift team to operate the plant in any situation. There are two main consequences regarding the definition of the KIC configuration. 1) The KIC composition shall be defined so that they are sufficient for the shift team to finish their tasks. It is linked to “Human Factors” concerns as well as organization concerns. 2) The probability of KIC OWP (Operator Work Place) unavailable shall be taken into account in order to figure out the relationship between the fault leading to KIC OWP unavailable and different KIC degraded situation. The technology and architecture choices fix limits to the flexibility and robustness that the KIC can offer regarding its own degraded situations. Therefore, in order to keep a low frequency of use of the Back-Up Panel, it might be needed to adapt and review the operating organization and needs to stay on the KIC by raising the discomfort of operation for the shift team. Nevertheless, such an approach is limited as reducing the discomfort of operation as obviously a price in term of safety notably. Therefore, the KIC degraded situation shall be studied in order to identify the criteria beyond which the safety operation of the plant cannot be ensured anymore from the KIC. After studying the features of the fault leading to KIC OWP key component unavailable, the data from DCS supplier, the data from reference NPP (Nuclear Power Plant) and the statistic during commissioning, the MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures) for each OWP has been calculated. Applying Markov Processes based on the studying above, CPR1000 operation principles, features of SOP (state oriented procedures to deal with accident situation) and PSA, CNPEC suggest the method to calculate KIC minimum configuration for reaching the best balance to maximize the availability of the KIC, to minimize frequency of switch to the Back-Up Panel (conventional control means) and to increase the plant availability (as the switch to the Back-Up Panel can lead to the fallback of the unit).
Skip Nav Destination
18th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering
May 17–21, 2010
Xi’an, China
Conference Sponsors:
- Nuclear Engineering Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-4929-3
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Applying Markov Processes for KIC Minimum Configuration Calculation
Ke Tan,
Ke Tan
China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China
Search for other works by this author on:
Guojin Jiang,
Guojin Jiang
China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China
Search for other works by this author on:
Yongbin Sun,
Yongbin Sun
China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China
Search for other works by this author on:
Huaqing Peng,
Huaqing Peng
China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China
Search for other works by this author on:
Ji Shi
Ji Shi
China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China
Search for other works by this author on:
Ke Tan
China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China
Guojin Jiang
China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China
Yongbin Sun
China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China
Huaqing Peng
China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China
Ji Shi
China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China
Paper No:
ICONE18-30099, pp. 841-844; 4 pages
Published Online:
April 8, 2011
Citation
Tan, K, Jiang, G, Sun, Y, Peng, H, & Shi, J. "Applying Markov Processes for KIC Minimum Configuration Calculation." Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering. 18th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering: Volume 1. Xi’an, China. May 17–21, 2010. pp. 841-844. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/ICONE18-30099
Download citation file:
8
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Uncertainty of Integral System Safety in Engineering
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (June,2022)
Dynamic Reliability Evaluation of Nonrepairable Multistate Weighted k -Out-of- n System With Dependent Components Based on Copula
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (December,2018)
Integrated Power Recovery Using Markov Modeling
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (November,2011)
Related Chapters
A PSA Update to Reflect Procedural Changes (PSAM-0217)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Modeling of SAMG Operator Actions in Level 2 PSA (PSAM-0164)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Framework for the Human Event Repository and Analysis (HERA) System and Its Use to Quantify Human Actions (PSAM-0224)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)